Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:30:48.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pyricularia setariae: a potential bioherbicide agent for control of green foxtail (Setaria viridis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gary Peng ,
K. N. Byer  and
K. L. Bailey
K. N. Byer
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
K. L. Bailey
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-three fungal isolates, pathogenic to green foxtail, were evaluated for weed control potential under controlled conditions. To determine weed control efficacy, these pathogens were applied as spore or mycelial suspensions at approximately 105 propagules ml−1 to green foxtail at the three-leaf stage. One week after inoculation, most isolates caused only minor injury to the plants, but 15 isolates caused 50 to 100% disease. Among the most efficacious isolates, only those of Pyricularia setariae exhibited strong host specificity to the target weed, revealing no significant pathogenicity on 28 other plant species tested, including many important crops such as wheat, barley, and oat. On green foxtail leaves, conidia of this fungus germinated readily at 14, 20, and 26 C, but the process of germination and appressorial formation was more rapid at the higher temperatures. The fungus applied at the concentration of 105 spores ml−1 reduced weed fresh weight by 34% 7 d after the treatment when compared with controls, whereas a concentration of 107 spores ml−1 reduced fresh weight by 87%. This efficacy was comparable with that of the herbicide sethoxydim. When applied to the weed at the one- to four-leaf stages, the fungus reduced green foxtail fresh weight by more than 80%. Efficacy was slightly lower on plants at the five-leaf stage or older. On the green foxtail biotype resistant to the herbicide sethoxydim, P. setariae caused 80% fresh weight reduction compared with untreated controls, as opposed to 17% achieved with the herbicide. At 20 C, the fungus required a minimum of 6-h dew period to initiate infection, but a 10-h dew period was needed to cause severe damage to green foxtail.

Keywords

Sethoxydimgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVIbarley, Hordeum vulgare L.oat, Avena sativa L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Biological controlmycoherbicide
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 105 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Auld, B. A. and Morin, L. 1995. Constraints in the development of bioherbicides. Weed Technol 9:638–652.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. G. and Eijnatten, C. V. 1961. Corn gray spot caused by Pyricularia grisea . Phytopathology 51:197–198.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Legere, A. 1999. Nature, occurrence and cost of herbicide-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) across Saskatchewan ecoregions. Weed Technol 13:626–631.Google Scholar
Boyetchko, S. M., Rosskopf, E. N., Caesar, A. J., and Charudattan, R. 2002. Biological weed control with pathogens: search for candidates to applications. Pages 239–274 in Khachatourians, G. G. and Arora, D. K. eds. Applied Mycology and Biotechnology. Volume 2. Agriculture and Food Production. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Butler, D. R., Wadia, K. D. R., and Hadhav, D. R. 1994. Effects of leaf wetness and temperature on late leaf-spot of groundnut. Plant Pathol 43:112–120.Google Scholar
Douglas, B. J., Thomas, A. G., Morrison, I. N., and May, M. G. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 70. Setaria viridis (L) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci 65:669–690.Google Scholar
Evans, C. K., Hunger, R. M., and Siegerist, W. C. 1996. Inoculation density and infection efficiency of conidia and conidiophores of isolates of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis . Plant Dis 80:505–512.Google Scholar
Figliola, S. S., Camper, N. D., and Ridings, W. H. 1988. Potential biological control agents for goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Weed Sci 36:830–835.Google Scholar
Fung, K., Barry, B., and Wilson, M. 1999. Atlas of Saskatchewan. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan. 336 p.Google Scholar
Gould, F. W. and Shaw, R. B. 1983. Grass Systematics. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. 382 p.Google Scholar
Greaves, M. P., Duton, L., and Lawrie, J. 2000. Formulation of microbial herbicides. Asp. Appl. Biol 57:171–178.Google Scholar
Greaves, M. P., Holloway, P. J., and Auld, B. A. 1998. Formulation of microbial herbicides. Pages 203–233 in Burges, H. D. ed. Formulations of Microbial Biopesticides. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Greaves, M. P. and MacQueen, M. D. 1992. Bioherbicides: their role in tomorrow's agriculture. Pages 295–306 in Denholm, I., Devonshire, A. L., and Hollomon, D. W. eds. Achievements and Developments in Combating Pesticide Resistance. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Green, S. and Bailey, K. L. 2000. Influence of moisture and temperature on infection of Canada thistle by Alternaria cirsinoxia . Plant Dis 84:1126–1132.Google Scholar
Harding, H. 1975. Effect of pH and sucrose concentration on conidium size and septation in four Bipolaris species. Can. J. Bot 53:1457–1464.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1996. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 44:25–30.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. D., Smith, H. E., and Auld, B. A. 2002. Effects of some environmental conditions on the effectiveness of Drechslera avenacea (Curtis ex Cooke) Shoem.: a potential bioherbicidal organism for Avena fatua L. Biol. Control 24:103–109.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, S. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Horsfall, J. G. and Barratt, R. W. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases. Phytopathology 35:665. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Kapoor, A. S. and Singh, B. M. 1977. Influence of some environmental factors on spore germination and infection of rice by Pyricularia oryzae . Indian Phytopathol 30:369–373.Google Scholar
Klein, T. A., Auld, B. A., and Fang, W. 1995. Influence of spore dose and water volume on a mycoherbicide's efficacy in field trials. Biol. Control 5:173–178.Google Scholar
Lawrie, J., Down, V. M., and Greaves, M. P. 2000. Factors influencing the efficacy of the potential microbial herbicide Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler on Amaranthus retroflexus (L). Biocontrol Sci. Technol 10:81–87.Google Scholar
Moss, M. A. and Trevathan, L. E. 1987. Environmental conditions conducive to infection of ryegrass by Pyricularia grisea . Phytopathology 77:863–866.Google Scholar
Namai, T. and Yamanaka, S. 1983. A component contained in oatmeal that favors the sporulation of rice blast fungus, Pyricularia oryzae Cavara. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn 49:274–276.Google Scholar
Nordbo, E., Kristensen, K., and Kirknel, E. 1993. Effects of wind direction, wind speed and travel speed on spray deposition. Pestic. Sci 38:33–41.Google Scholar
Okada, M. and Yaegashi, H. 1985. Blast disease of two-rowed barley. Proc. Kanto-Tosan Plant Prot. Soc 32:50–51.Google Scholar
Peng, G., Wolf, T. M., Byer, K. N., and Caldwell, B. 2001. Spray retention on green foxtail (Setaria viridis) using airbrush and broadcast sprayers and its impact on the efficacy of a mycoherbicide agent. Pages 699–706 in Ni, H. W. and Zhen, G. Y. eds. Proceedings of the 18th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Beijing: Standard.Google Scholar
[SAF] Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 2000. Guide to Crop Protection—Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Regina, Canada: Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food, & Rural Revitalization. 330 p.Google Scholar
Templeton, G. E. and TeBeest, D. O. 1979. Biological weed control with mycoherbicides. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol 17:301–310.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Frick, B. L., Van Acker, R. C., Knezevic, S. Z., and Joosse, D. 1998. Manitoba Weeds Survey: Cereal and Oilseed Crops 1997. Weed Survey Series Publication 98-1. Saskatoon, Canada: AAFC Saskatoon Research Center. 192 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Wise, R. F., Frick, B. L., and Juras, L. T. 1996. Saskatchewan Weeds Survey: Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops 1995. Weed Survey Series Publication 96-1. Saskatoon, Canada: AAFC Saskatoon Research Center. 419 p.Google Scholar
Urashima, A. S., Igarashi, S., and Kato, H. 1993. Host range, mating type, and fertility of Pyricularia grisea from wheat in Brazil. Plant Dis 77:1211–1216.Google Scholar
Wapshere, A. J. 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Ann. Appl. Biol 77:201–211.Google Scholar
Weidemann, G. J. and TeBeest, D. O. 1990. Genetic variability of fungal pathogens and their weed hosts. Pages 176–183 in Hogland, R. E. ed. Microbes and Microbial Products as Herbicides. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winder, R. S. and Van Dyke, C. G. 1990. The pathogenicity, virulence, and biocontrol potential of two Bipolaris species on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci 38:89–94.Google Scholar
Womack, J. G., Eccleston, G. M., and Burge, M. N. 1996. A vegetable oil-based invert emulsion for mycoherbicide delivery. Biol. Control 6:23–28.Google Scholar