Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:31:11.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Three Dinitroaniline Herbicides on Rice (Oryza sativa) Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fayte Brewer ,
Terry L. Lavy  and
Ronald E. Talbert
Fayte Brewer
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Terry L. Lavy
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted for 3 yr to evaluate residual levels of fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) for their effects on injury and yields of rice (Oryza sativa L.). All three herbicides consistently injured rice and reduced yield at application rates above 0.1 kg/ha. These herbicides were similar in their effects on rice, but trifluralin was slightly more phytotoxic than fluchloralin or profluralin. Bioassay showed fluchloralin and trifluralin to be more inhibitory than profluralin of root and shoot elongation. The order of toxicity of the vapors of these herbicides arising from treated soil was found to be trifluralin > profluralin > fluchloralin. Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) was slightly more sensitive to these herbicides than was rice when seedlings were grown in treated soil and over 10 times more susceptible than rice to injury from their vapors. Both plant species were less affected by the herbicides in silty clay than in silt loam soil.

Keywords

Oryza sativaSorghum bicolorherbicide carry-overcrop rotationvolatilityfluchloralinprofluralintrifluralin
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , March 1982 , pp. 153 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels and dates of dinitroaniline herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312–317.Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Differential phytotoxicity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bryant, T. A. and Andrews, H. 1967. Disappearance of diuron, norea, linuron, trifluralin, diphenamid, DCPA, and prometryn from soil. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 20:395–404.Google Scholar
5. Caruther, C. G., Abernathy, J. R., and Keeling, J. W. 1976. Rotational crop response to ppm determinations of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:82.Google Scholar
6. Feeny, R. W. 1966. Effect of trifluralin on the growth of oat seedlings and respiration of excised oat roots. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 20:595–603.Google Scholar
7. Harper, L. A., White, A. W., Bruce, R. R., Thomas, A. W., and Leonard, R. A. 1976. Soil and microclimate effects on trifluralin volatilization. J. Environ. Qual. 5:236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.Google Scholar
9. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicities of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.Google Scholar
10. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120–124.Google Scholar
11. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.Google Scholar
12. Hollist, R. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Trifluralin interactions with soil constituents. Weed Sci. 19:11–16.Google Scholar
13. Horowitz, R. H., Hulin, M. N., and Blumenfeld, T. 1974. Behavior and persistence of trifluralin in soil. Weed Res. 14:213–220.Google Scholar
14. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Dinitroaniline herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by soil moisture and herbicide vaporization. Weed Sci. 27:536–539.Google Scholar
15. Jordan, T. N. and Barrentine, W. L. 1978. Comparative toxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 26:72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kearney, P. C., Plimmer, J. R., Wheeler, W. B., and Kontson, A. 1976. Persistence and metabolism of dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McWhorter, C. G. 1977. Johnsongrass control in soybeans with soil-incorporated dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 25:264–267.Google Scholar
18. Mercado, B. L. and Talatala, R. L. 1971. Morphological and physiological responses of crops and weeds to trifluralin. III. Anatomic effects of trifluralin on the root of rice. Phillip. Agric. 54:375–383.Google Scholar
19. Miller, J. H., Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., and Carter, C. H. 1978. Persistence and movement of ten herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 26:20–27.Google Scholar
20. Murray, D. S., Santelmann, P. W., and Greer, H.A.L. 1973. Differential phytotoxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Agron. J. 65:34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Negi, N. S. and Funderburk, H. H. 1968. Effect of solution and vapors of trifluralin on growth of roots and shoots. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 37–38.Google Scholar
22. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weeds 14:117–121.Google Scholar
23. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W. Jr., and Burt, G. W. 1976. Volatility of eleven dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:529–532.Google Scholar
24. Penner, D. 1971. Effect of temperature on phytotoxicity and root uptake of several herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Robison, I. R. and Fenster, C. R. 1968. Residual effect of EPTC and trifluralin incorporated with different implements. Weed Sci. 16:415–417.Google Scholar
26. Savage, K. E. 1978. Persistence of several dinitroaniline herbicides as affected by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 26:465–471.Google Scholar
27. Schultz, D. P., Funderburk, H. H., and Negi, N. S. 1968. Effect of trifluralin on growth, morphology, and nucleic acid synthesis. Plant Physiol. 43:265–273.Google Scholar
28. Schweizer, E. E. and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1966. Persistence of five cotton herbicides in four southern soils. Weeds. 14:22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Swann, C. W. and Behrens, R. 1972. Phytotoxicity of trifluralin vapors from soil. Weed Sci. 20:143–146.Google Scholar
30. Wiese, A. F. and Smith, D. T. 1970. Herbicidal activity as affected by soil incorporation and rainfall. Weed Sci. 18:515–517.Google Scholar
31. Zimdahl, R. L. and Gwynn, S. M. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci. 25:247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar