Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:18:02.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Duration of volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) interference in bulb onion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin M. Williams II ,
Corey V. Ransom  and
W. Mack Thompson
Corey V. Ransom
Affiliation:
Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, 595 Onion Avenue, Ontario, OR 97914
W. Mack Thompson
Affiliation:
Pioneer Hi-bred International Inc., P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 50131
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research with annual weed species indicates that critical timing of weed removal begins primarily after the two-leaf stage of onion, a time when postemergence (POST) herbicides can first be applied. Volunteer potato is difficult to manage and persists in onion fields of western United States. The purpose of this research was to quantify the duration of volunteer potato interference on yield and market grade of onion as well as potato tuber production. Volunteer potato interference caused a 5% yield loss before onions reached the two-leaf stage, at two of three locations. Relative to weed-free plots, onion bulb diameter was reduced as duration of interference increased, resulting in smaller proportions of marketable bulbs. Volunteer potato produced daughter tubers shortly after emergence, which explains, in part, weed persistence despite removal of shoots with contact herbicides, cultivation, and hand-weeding in onion. Significant losses in onion yield and bulb diameter are likely given current volunteer potato management systems.

Keywords

Volunteer potato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’, ‘Ranger Russet’onion, Allium cepa L. ‘Pinnacle’, ‘Vaquero’Competitioncritical time of weed removalcritical weed-free period
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 62 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003. Agricultural Statistics. Chapter IV. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Seymour, M. D. 2002. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in onion (Allium cepa). Weed Technol 16:620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Williams, M. M. II. 2003. Effect of soil fumigation on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber viability. Weed Technol 17:352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussler, B. H., Maxwell, B. D., and Puettmann, K. J. 1995. Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods. Weed Sci 43:586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunan, C. M., Westra, P., Moore, F., and Chapman, P. 1996. Modelling the effect of duration of weed competition, weed density and weed competitiveness on seeded, irrigated onion. Weed Res 36:259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunan, C. M., Westra, P., and Moore, F. D. III. 1999. A plant process economic model for weed management decisions in irrigated onion. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 124:99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunan, C. M., Westra, P., Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Moore, F. D. III. 1995. The concept and application of early economic period threshold: the case of DCPA in onions (Allium cepa). Weed Sci 43:634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Fletcher, F. N. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with postemergence directed herbicides. Weed Technol 7:298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, P. J. 1992. Weed hosts of beet western yellow virus and potato leafroll virus. Plant Dis 76:1137–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., Schmoll, J. T., and Webb, J. E. 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci 49:224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, R. T. and Roberts, H. A. 1971. The effect of weed removal at different times on the yield of bulb onions. J. Hortic. Sci 46:471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewson, R. T. and Roberts, H. A. 1973. Some effects of weed competition on the growth of onions. J. Hortic. Sci 48:51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci 44:309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumkes, L. M. 1974. Research on the control of volunteer potatoes in the Netherlands. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf 12:1031–1040.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. 1977. Investigations into some aspects of the biology of potatoes as weeds. Weed Res 17:123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menges, R. M. and Tamez, S. 1981. Common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) interference in onions (Allium cepa). Weed Sci 29:641–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelter, G. Q., Sorensen, E. J., Thornton, R. E., and Stevens, R. 1992. Dry Bulb Onion Production in the Columbia Basin. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Cooperative Extension, EB1693. 18 p.Google Scholar
Perombelon, M. C. M. 1975. Observations on the survival of potato groundkeepers in Scotland. Potato Res 18:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Pages 135–153 in Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Shadbolt, C. A. and Holm, L. G. 1956. Some quantitative aspects of weed competition in vegetable crops. Weeds 4:111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. N. and Wright, C. J. 1984. A study of the factors affecting the onset of critical period of weed competition in the onion crop (Allium cepa L). Scientific Hortic 35:94–100.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. E. 1983. Sources and dissemination of potato viruses in the Columbia basin of Northwestern United States. Plant Dis 67:744–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Johnston, D. N., Nuland, D. S., and Kinbacher, E. J. 1973. Competition between annual weeds and sweet Spanish onions. Weed Sci 21:436–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Boydston, R. A. 2002. Effect of shoot removal during tuberization on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber production. Weed Technol 16:617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Ransom, C. V., and Thompson, W. M. 2004a. Effect of volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) density on bulb onion yield and quality. Weed Sci 52:754–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Walsh, D. B., and Boydston, R. A. 2004b. Integrating arthropod herbivory and reduced herbicide use for weed management. Weed Sci. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar