Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:24:59.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alachlor and 1,8-Naphthalic Anhydride Effects on Corn Coleoptiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Stephen Hickey
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901
W. A. Krueger
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901

Abstract

More force was required to induce leaf slippage in coleoptiles from corn (Zea mays L. ‘Tenn 5009′) plants grown in the presence of 25 ppmw alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] than in the controls, or in coleoptiles from plants grown in the presence of 25 ppmw alachlor in combination with 150 ppmw 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (hereafter referred to as NA). NA alone reduced the force required to induce leaf slippage below that of all treatments. Incubation for 16 hr in 10 ppmw IAA (indoleacetic acid) did not lower the force required to induce leaf slippage in coleoptiles from plants grown in the presence of 25 ppmw alachlor even though the length of the coleptiles increased 30% more than coleoptiles not receiving the IAA treatment. Percent dry matter, dry matter per 100 plants, and percent protein increased in coleoptiles from alachlor treated plants, while percent cellulose and lignin decreased. The extent of variation in these parameters was lessened when NA was applied in combination with alachlor, with the exception of percent lignin which was further decreased by the combination treatment. Percent hemicellulose was not affected by alachlor, NA, or their combination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hahn, R.R. and Merkle, M.G. 1972. Effects of seed treatments on grain sorghum tolerance to alachlor. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:166.Google Scholar
2. Hickey, J.S. and Krueger, W.A. 1974. Alachlor and 1,8-naphthalic anhydride effects on sorghum seedling development. Weed Sci. 22:8690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lamport, D.T.A. 1962. Hydroxyproline of primary cell walls. Fed. Proc. 21:398.Google Scholar
4. Lamport, D.T.A. 1967. Hydroxyproline-O-glycosidic linkage of the plant cell wall glycoprotein extensin. Nature 216:13221324.Google Scholar
5. Nooden, L. and Thimann, K.V. 1963. Evidence for a requirement for protein synthesis for auxin-induced cell enlargement. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 50:194200.Google Scholar
6. Olson, A.C., Bonner, J., and Morré, D.J. 1965. Force extension analysis of Avena coleoptile cell walls. Planta. 66:126134.Google Scholar
7. Thomas, R.L., Sheard, R.W., and Moyer, J.R. 1967. Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron. J. 59:240243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Van Slyke, D.D. and Hiller, A. 1933. Determination of ammonia in blood. J. Biol. Chem. 102:449504.Google Scholar
9. Van Soest, P.J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. Jour. 46:829835.Google Scholar