Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:35:19.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal asynchrony interferes with vernier acuity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Christian Wehrhahn  and
Gerald Westheimer
Christian Wehrhahn
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Division of Neurobiology, University of California, Berkeley
Gerald Westheimer
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Division of Neurobiology, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two dots may be aligned vertically with a precision much higher than that expected from two-point resolution provided they are separated by a visual angle of 3–5 min of arc. This precision suffers when the two dots are not exposed synchronously. Neither onset nor offset asynchronies can be tolerated; exposure differences of the two components of the vernier task as low as 30 ms can lead to a reduction in performance when the total exposure is below 90 ms. This effect cannot be compensated for by synchronizing the onset of one stimulus component with the offset of the other, even when the two are of opposite contrast. The data suggest that vernier acuity may be subserved by a dynamical linking of cortical excitation generated by the synchronous arrival of signals within a range of locations in the cortex whose spatial separation is critical for optimal hyperacuity performance. The evidence presented in this paper must be taken into account when a physiological substrate for hyperacuity is considered.

Keywords

Vernier acuityTemporal synchronizationHyperacuityDynamical linkingON/OFF pathways
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D.P. (1967). Perception of contour orientation in the human fovea–I. Short lines. Vision Research 7, 974–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, A. & Scottun, B.C. (1987). Effects of contrast and spatial frequency on vernier acuity. Vision Research 27, 1817–1824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, K., Sato, H. & Daw, N. (1989). The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 9, 2443–2454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D.H. & Livingstone, M.S. (1990). Color and contrast sensitivity in the lateral geniculate body and primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 10, 2223–2237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K.A. & Baughman, R.W. (1988). NMDA- and non-NMDA-receptor components of excitatory synaptic potentials recorded from cells in layer V of rat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 8, 3522–3534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremers, J., Lee, B.B., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (1991). The responses of macaque retinal ganglion cells to complex temporal waveforms. In From Pigment to Perception, ed. Valberg, A. & Lee, B.New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lee, B.B., Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., Martin, P.A. & Valberg, A. (1990). Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7, 2223–2236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, B.B., Wehrhahn, C., Westheimer, G. & Kremers, J. (1992). Macaque retinal ganglion cell responses to stimuli that elicit hyperacuity in man. Neuroscience (in press).Google Scholar
Levi, D.M. & Westheimer, G. (1987). Spatial interval discrimination in the human fovea: what delimits the interval? Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 1304–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matin, L., Pola, J., Matin, E. & Picoult, E. (1980). Vernier discrimination with sequentially flashed lines: roles of eye movements, retinal offsets and short-term memory. Vision Research 21, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K.D., Chapman, B. & Stryker, M.P. (1989). Visual responses in adult cat visual cortex depend on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 86, 5183–5187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, K.M., Jones, D.G. & Van Sluyters, R.C. (1988). Vernier acuity for an opposite contrast stimulus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 29, 40.Google Scholar
O’Shea, R.P. & Mitchell, D.E. (1990). Vernier acuity with opposite contrast stimuli. Perception 19, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiller, P.H. (1982). Central connections of the retinal ON- and OFF-pathways. Nature 297, 580–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sporns, O., Tononi, G. & Edelman, G.M. (1991). Modeling perceptual grouping and figure-ground segregation by means of active reentrant connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 88, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swindale, N.V. & Cynader, M.S. (1986). Vernier acuity of neurones in cat visual cortex. Nature 319, 591–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von der Malsburg, C. (1985). Nervous structures with dynamical links. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für Physikalische Chemie 89, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrhahn, C. & Westheimer, G. (1990). How vernier acuity depends on contrast. Experimental Brain Research 80, 618–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westheimer, G. & Hauske, G. (1975). Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity. Vision Research 15, 1137–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westheimer, G. & McKee, S.P. (1977). Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vision Research 17, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westheimer, G. (1990). Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Vol. LV, pp. 759–763. Cold Spring Harbour: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Westheimer, G. (1979). The spatial sense of the eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 18, 893–912.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiesel, T.N. & Hubel, D.H. (1966). Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the Rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 29, 1115–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed