Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:55:33.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual performance of horseshoe crabs day and night

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Maureen K. Powers ,
Robert B. Barlow Jr  and
Leonard Kass
Maureen K. Powers
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
Robert B. Barlow Jr
Affiliation:
Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse
Leonard Kass
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Maine, Orono
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A circadian clock modulates the structure and function of the lateral eyes of Limulus polyphemus, greatly increasing their sensitivity at night. During the mating season, male Limulus are visually attracted both day and night to females and objects that resemble females. This paper asks how well Limulus can see day and night, and whether the circadian changes in retinal sensitivity might influence the ability of these animals to find mates. We recorded the visual behavior of male and female horseshoe crabs in the vicinity of an object – a cement hemisphere (29.5 cm diameter) similar in size and shape to a female horseshoe crab – placed in a mating area near Mashnee Dike, Bourne, Massachusetts. Males oriented toward this target from an average distance of 0.94 m during the day and 0.88 m at night; and females appeared to avoid the target. We conclude that males can see potential mates at night almost as well as they can during the day. Apparently the circadian changes in the retina help compensate for the daily changes in illumination in the animal's normal environment. This study provides the first evidence for a role of visual circadian rhythms in an animal's natural behavior.

Keywords

Circadian rhythmsLimulus polyphemusRetinal adaptationVisual sensitivity
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 179 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, R.B. Jr (1983). Circadian rhythms in the Limulus visual system. Journal of Neuroscience 3, 856–870.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr (1986). From string galvanometer to digital computer: Halden Keffer Hartline (1902–1983). Trends in Neuroscience 9, 552–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr (1988). Circadian rhythms in the sensitivity of the Limulus retina nearly compensate for the day-night changes in ambient illumination. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 29, 350.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Bolanowski, S.J. Jr & Brachman, M.L. (1977). Efferent optic nerve fibers mediate circadian rhythms in the Limulus eye. Science 197, 86–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Chamberlain, S.C. & Levinson, J.Z. (1980). Limulus brain modulates the structure and function of the lateral eyes. Science 210, 1037–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Ireland, L.C. & Kass, L. (1982). Vision has a role in Limulus mating behavior. Nature 296, 65–66.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Kaplan, E., Renninger, G.H. & Saito, T. (1987). Circadian rhythms in Limulus photoreceptors, I: Intracellular recordings. Journal of General Physiology 89, 353–370.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Powers, M.K., Howard, H. & Kass, L. (1986). Migration of Limulus for mating: relation to lunar, phase, tide height, and sunlight. Biological Bulletin 171, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Powers, M.K. & Kass, L. (1988). Vision and mating behavior in Limulus. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals, ed. Atema, J., Fay, R.R., Popper, A.N. & Tavolga, W.N., pp. 419–34. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Batra, R. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1982). Efferent control of pattern vision in Limulus. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts 9, 849.Google Scholar
Batra, R. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1990). Efferent control of temporal response properties of the Limulus lateral eye. Journal of General Physiology 95, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, S.C. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1979). Light and efferent activity control rhabdom turnover in Limulus photoreceptors. Science 206, 361–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J.A. & Brockmann, H.J. (1983). Breeding activity and mate selection in the horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus). Bulletin of Maine Science 33, 274–281.Google Scholar
Hartline, H.K. (1969). Visual receptors and retinal interaction. In Les Prix Nobel en 1967, The Nobel Foundation, pp. 242–259.Google Scholar
Hartline, H.K. & Graham, C.H. (1932). Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 1, 277–295.Google Scholar
Herzog, E.D. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1990). The Limulus eye view of the world. Biological Bulletin 179, 230.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1980). Circadian clock in Limulus brain increases response and decreases noise of retinal photoreceptors. Nature 286, 393–395.Google Scholar
Lockwood, S. (1870). The horse foot crab. American Naturalist 4, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, M.K. & Barlow, R.B. Jr (1985). Behavioral correlates of circadian rhythms in the Limulus visual system. Biological Bulletin 169, 578–591.Google Scholar
Ratliff, F. (1974). Studies on Excitation and Inhibition in the Retina–A Collection of Papers from the Laboratory of H. Keffer Hartline. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Shlaer, S., Smith, E.L. & Chase, A.M. (1942). Visual acuity and illumination in different spectral regions. Journal of General Physiology 25, 553–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vineyard, G.L. & O'brien, W.J. (1976). Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33, 2845–2849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar