Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:00:57.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DOLLS’ DRESSMAKER RE(AD)DRESSED: JENNY WREN'S CRITIQUE OF CHILDHOOD, FEMININITY, AND APPEARANCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Ben Moore
Ben Moore*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of all Dickens's eccentric children – whose numbers include the Artful Dodger, Paul Dombey, Little Nell, and Smike – none, perhaps, is more peculiarly “old-fashioned” than Jenny Wren in Our Mutual Friend (1864-65). From her first appearance, Jenny exhibits a strange indeterminacy:

A parlour door within a small entry stood open, and disclosed a child – a dwarf – a girl – a something – sitting on a little low old-fashioned arm-chair, which had a kind of little working bench before it.

“I can't get up,” said the child, “because my back's bad, and my legs are queer. But I'm the person of the house.” (222; bk. 2, ch.1)

This description of Jenny cannot settle. The initial assumption that she is a child is placed in doubt as she becomes, in quick succession, a “dwarf,” a “girl,” a “something.” It is left to her to define how she should be perceived, but the phrase she chooses – “the person of the house” – only compounds the confusion. Throughout this article I follow the spirit of this passage. Rather than pursuing a “true” description of Jenny Wren, I offer a reading that puts her indeterminacy centre-stage, along with her job as a “dolls’ dressmaker” for wealthy women. In her appearance, her work, and her language, I argue, Jenny calls into question how gender and child/adult identities are constructed in nineteenth-century society, both in her own working-class milieu, where she is taunted by local children (224; bk. 2, ch. 1), and in the fashionable upper- and middle-class world to whose whims she caters. In addition, I draw upon Thomas Carlyle's novel Sartor Resartus (1833-34) and the work of Walter Benjamin to suggest that Jenny's satirical and playful use of words constitutes a philosophical critique of the mutability of appearance in mid-nineteenth-century modernity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 473 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adrian, Arthur. Dickens and the Parent-Child Relationship. Athens: Ohio UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Andrews, Malcolm. Dickens and the Grown-up Child. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1994.Google Scholar
Beatty, Bernard. “Two Kinds of Clothing: Sartor Resartus and Great Expectations.” Rereading Victorian Fiction. Ed. Jenkins, Alice and John, Juliet. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. 44–58.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin. Cambridge: Belknap, 1999.Google Scholar
Berry, Laura. The Child, the State, and the Victorian Novel. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1999.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Christian, Mildred. “Carlyle's Influence Upon the Social Theory of Dickens. Part One: Their Personal Relationship.” Trollopian 1 (1947): 27–35.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “A Child's Dream of a Star.” Household Words 1 (1850): 25–26.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. A Christmas Carol. The Broadview Anthology of British Literature: The Victorian Era. Ed. Black, Joseph et al. Plymouth: Broadview, 2006. 313–52.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. “George Silverman's Explanation.” Selected Short Fiction. London: Penguin, 1976. 379–406.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Donovan, Frank. Dickens and Youth. New York: Dodd, 1968.Google Scholar
“Forfeit, n.3” OED Online. Oxford: Oxford UP, Dec. 2015. Web. 17 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
Furneaux, Holly. “Childhood.” Charles Dickens in Context. Ed. Furneaux, Holly and Ledger, Sally. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. 186–93.Google Scholar
Goetsch, Paul. “Old-fashioned Children: From Dickens to Hardy and James.” Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 123 (2005): 45–69.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Eugenia. “‘I sometimes think she is a spy on all my actions’: Dolls, Girls and Disciplinary Surveillance in the Nineteenth-Century Doll Tale.” Children's Literature 39 (2011): 33–57.Google Scholar
Gorham, Deborah. The Victorian Girl and the Feminine Ideal. London: Croom Helm, 1982.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Review of Our Mutual Friend . Selected Literary Criticism. Ed. Shapira, Morris. London: Heinemann, 1963. 6–10.Google Scholar
“Jenny wren, n.1” OED Online. Oxford: Oxford UP, Dec. 2015. Web. 17 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
Jones, Gregory. “‘Rude Intercourse’: Uncensoring Wordsworth's ‘Nutting.’” Studies in Romanticism 35 (1996): 213–43.Google Scholar
Kearns, Katherine. Nineteenth-Century Literary Realism: Through the Looking Glass. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Kincaid, James. Child-Loving: The Erotic Child and Victorian Culture. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Kincaid, James. “Dickens and the Construction of the Child.” Dickens and the Children of Empire. Ed. Jacobson, Wendy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000. 29–42.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Charles. Alton Locke. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. “Victorian Realism.” The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel. 2nd ed. Ed. David, Deirdre. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 84–106.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Writer and Critic. Trans. Arthur Kahn. London: Merlin, 1970.Google Scholar
Morris, Pam. Dickens's Class Consciousness: A Marginal View. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1991.Google Scholar
Nelson, Claudia. Precocious Children and Childish Adults and Childish Adults: Age Inversion in Victorian Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Newsom, Robert. “Fictions of Childhood.” The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens. Ed. Jordan, John. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 92–105.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Lying in an Extra-Moral Sense.” Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. Ed. Gilman, Sander, Blair, Carole, and Parent, David. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 546–57.Google Scholar
Rowland, Ann. “Wordsworth's Children of the Revolution.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 41 (2001): 677–94.Google Scholar
Royle, Nicholas. “Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Refigured: Bodies, Desires and Other Histories. Ed. Schad, John. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1996. 39–54.Google Scholar
Sanders, Andrew. Charles Dickens: Resurrectionist. London: Macmillan, 1982.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. 2nd ed. Ed.Jowett, John et al. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005. 969–94.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally. The Mind of the Child: Child Development in Literature, Science, and Medicine, 1840–1900. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Walder, Dennis. Dickens and Religion. London: George Allen, 1981.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. Death and the Future Life in Victorian Literature and Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. “Ode: Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood.” Selected Poems of W. Wordsworth. Ed. Sharock, Roger. Oxford: Heinemann, 1958. 103–09.Google Scholar