Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:15:03.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LETTY GARTH'S LITTLE RED BOOK: “RUMPELSTILTSKIN,” REALISM, AND MIDDLEMARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Lee O'Brien
Lee O'Brien*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Letty Garth's “favourite red volume” makes its appearance in Middlemarch at the beginning of Book 7, at the Vincy's New Year's Day party that draws most of the Middlemarch town characters together. It is a small passage that can easily go unnoticed – or, if registered at all, glossed as simply part of the fabric of dense, inconsequential details that realist texts deploy to produce verisimilitude. Roland Barthes describes such details as potentially “scandalous” from the point of view of structure in that they seem to amount to “a kind of narrative luxury,” likely to threaten structural coherence, recoverable at best as “filling” or as giving “some index of character or atmosphere” (141). Such details might be said to reinforce the vices of nineteenth-century realism, including closing the gap between words and things: “we are the real,” these details say, producing “the referential illusion” (148). They amount to bad narrative housekeeping, “increasing the cost of narrative information” (141). Since the detail of Letty's book involves a young child it is doubly likely, in a novel so clearly dedicated to the adult world of compromise and doubtful success, to be set aside as mere local colour. The potentially trivializing function of the paradox of small instances of excess is reflected in Barthes’ descriptive phrases for them: “useless details,” “insignificant notation” (142).

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 549 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Armstrong, Nancy. How Novels Think: the Limits of Individualism from 1719–1900. New York: Columbia UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: U of Texas P, 1994.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “The Reality Effect.” The Rustle of Language. New York: Hill and Wang, 1986. 141–48.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. Critical Practice. London: Routledge, 1980.Google Scholar
Christ, Carol. “Aggression and Providential Death in George Eliot's Fiction.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 9.2 (1976): 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ralph. Introduction. Theorizing Genres I. New Literary History 34.2 (2003): v–xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ralph. “Notes Toward a Generic Reconstitution of Literary Study.” Theorizing Genres II. New Literary History 34.3 (2003): v–xvi.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “The Law of Genre.” Glyph 7 (1980): 202–32.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Silas Marner, the Weaver of Raveloe. Baltimore: Penguin, 1967.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: an Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: the Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Greiner, Rae. Sympathetic Realism in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Greiner, Rae. “Sympathy Time: Adam Smith, George Eliot, and the Realist Novel.”, Narrative 17.3 (2009): 291–311.Google Scholar
Haight, Gordon S., ed. The George Eliot Letters. New Haven: Yale UP, 1954.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Susan, ed. ‘Criminals, Idiots, Women, and Minors’: Victorian Writing by Women, on Women. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2004.Google Scholar
Harris, Margaret, and Johnston, Judith, eds. The Journals of George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Hoeveler, Diane Long. Gothic Riffs: Secularizing the Uncanny in the European Imaginary, 1780–1820. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Holcombe, Lee. “Victorian Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women's Property, Law, 1857–1882.” A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women. Ed. Vicinus, Martha. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Antinomies of Realism. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Le Dœuff, Michèle. Hipparchia's Choice: an Essay Concerning Women, Philosophy, etc, Trans. Selous, Trista. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Mahawatte, Royce. George Eliot and the Gothic Novel: Genres, Gender, Feeling. Cardiff: U, of Wales P, 2013.Google Scholar
Marcus, Sharon. Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England, Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007.Google Scholar
Paglia, Camille. Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence From Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson, New Haven: Yale UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Prince, Michael B. “Mauvais Genres.” New Literary History 34.3 (2003): 453–79.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. “Fiction, Fair and Foul.” Nineteenth Century 10 (October 1881): 516–31.Google Scholar
Shaw, Harry E. Narrating Reality: Austen, Scott, Eliot. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole G. Strange and Secret Peoples: Fairies and Victorian Consciousness. Oxford:, Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Staten, Henry. “Is Middlemarch Ahistorical?” PMLA 115.5 (2000): 991–1005.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. “Genres of Work: The Folktale and Silas Marner.” New Literary History, 34.3 (2003): 513–33.Google Scholar
Talairach-Vielmas, Laurence. “Beautiful Maidens, Hideous Suitors: Victorian Fairy Tales, and the Process of Civilization.” Marvels & Tales 24.2 (2010): 272–96.Google Scholar
Tatar, Maria. The Hard Facts of the Grimm's Fairy Tales. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Thorndyke-Breeze, Rebecca. “Realist Networks: Recent Work on Victorian Realism.”, Victorian Literature and Culture 43 (2015): 209–16.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha, ed. A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women, Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Wroth, Celestina. “‘To Root the Old Woman Out of our Minds’: Women Educationists and, Plebeian Culture in Late-Eighteenth- Century Britain.” Eighteenth-Century Life 30.2, (2006): 48–73.Google Scholar
Zipes, Jack. Fairy Tale as Myth, Myth as Fairy Tale. Lexington: U of Kentucky P, 1994.Google Scholar
Zipes, Jack, ed. German Popular Stories: Brothers Grimm. Adapted by Taylor, Edgar, Maidstone: Crescent Moon, 2013.Google Scholar