Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:39:29.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyse, que me veux-tu? Interpreting Stravinsky's Memorial to Debussy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2018

DAVID J. CODE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soon after Debussy's death in March 2018, Stravinsky began work on a memorial, the Symphonies d'instruments à vent (1920). This piece was to become iconic both for music-theoretical reflection on modern approaches to musical time and for musicological archaeologies of Stravinsky's debts to ‘Russian traditions’. Along both avenues, particular emphasis has long been given to the work's closing chorale, initially published separately in the 1920 Debussy tombeau issue of La Revue musicale.

This article argues for a radical reappraisal of the Symphonies, which builds anew on Stephen Walsh's 1996 study of the sketches and shifts the emphasis onto temporal questions long neglected under pitch-focused analysis. Exposing ‘thematic’ concerns of rhythmic and metrical parsing (as distinct from unifying motives or pitch sets), and interpreting Stravinsky's hommage in light of Debussy's famous 1907 definition of music as ‘de couleurs et de temps rythmés’, I ultimately bring fresh metacritical perspective to fundamental questions of analytical method and purpose long entertained (e.g.) by Joseph Kerman, Carl Dahlhaus, Kofi Agawu, and Robert Walser.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 259 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agawu, Kofi. ‘How We Got Out of Analysis, and How to Get Back in Again’, Music Analysis 23/2–3 (2004), 267–86.Google Scholar
Agawu, Kofi. ‘Taruskin's Problem(s)’, Music Theory Spectrum 33/2 (2011), 186–90.Google Scholar
Asafyev, Boris. A Book About Stravinsky, trans. French, Richard F.. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jonathan. ‘Le Sacre analyzed’, in Avatar of Modernity: The Rite of Spring Reconsidered, ed. Danuser, Hermann and Zimmermann, Heidi. London: Boosey & Hawkes, 2013. 284–305.Google Scholar
Boulez, Pierre. Relevés d'Apprenti, ed. Thévenin, Paul. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1966.Google Scholar
Boulez, Pierre. ‘Sonate, “que me veux-tu”’, in Points de Répère, ed. Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1981. 151–63.Google Scholar
Code, David J. ‘The Synthesis of Rhythms: Form, Ideology, and the “Augurs of Spring”’, Journal of Musicology 24/1 (2007), 112–66.Google Scholar
Code, David J. ‘Debussy, Discourse, Time: Listening for ‘la modernité’ in the Nocturnes, The Musical Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T. ‘Stravinsky: The Progress of a Method’, Perspectives of New Music 1/1 (1962), 18–26.Google Scholar
Cook, Nicholas. Music, Imagination, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cross, Jonathan. The Stravinsky Legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl. Nineteenth-Century Music, trans. Robinson, J. Bradford. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Debussy, Claude. Correspondance 1872–1918, ed. Lesure, François, Herlin, Denis, and Liébert, Georges. Paris: Gallimard, 2005.Google Scholar
Delaere, Mark. ‘Tempo, Metre, Rhythm, Time in Twentieth-Century Music’, in Unfolding Time: Studies in Temporality in Twentieth-Century Music, ed. Crispin, Darla. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009, 13–43.Google Scholar
Forte, Allen. ‘Harmonic Syntax and Voice Leading in Stravinsky's Early Music’, in Confronting Stravinsky: Man, Musician, and Modernist, ed. Pasler, Jann. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. 95–129.Google Scholar
Hasty, Christopher F. ‘On the Problem of Succession and Continuity in Twentieth-Century Music’, Music Theory Spectrum 8 (1986), 58–74.Google Scholar
Hoérée, Arthur. ‘Les Entretiens Debussy-Guiraud’, Avant-scène opéra 11 (1977), 140–5.Google Scholar
Horlacher, Gretchen. Building Blocks: Repetition and Continuity in the Music of Stravinsky. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kerman, Joseph. ‘How We Got into Analysis, and How to Get Out’, Critical Inquiry 7/2 (1980), 311–31.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan. ‘Discontinuity and Proportion in the Music of Stravinsky’, in Confronting Stravinsky: Man, Musician, and Modernist, ed. Pasler, Jann. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. 174–94.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan. The Time of Music: New Meanings, New Temporalities, New Listening Strategies. New York: Schirmer, 1988.Google Scholar
Levitz, Tamara, ed. Stravinsky and His World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ligeti, György. Ligeti in Conversation. London: Eulenburg, 1983.Google Scholar
Lockspeiser, Edward. Debussy: His Life and Mind. London: Cassell, 1962.Google Scholar
Newman, Ernest. ‘Stravinsky and Criticism’. The Sunday Times, 9 March 1924.Google Scholar
Rehding, Alexander. ‘Towards a “Logic of Discontinuity” in Stravinsky's Symphonies of Wind Instruments’, Music Analysis 17/1 (1998), 39–65.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Dictionnaire de musique. Paris: Chez la veuve Duchesne, 1768.Google Scholar
Shattuck, Roger. ‘The Devil's Dance: Stravinsky's Corporal Imagination’, in Confronting Stravinsky: Man, Musician, and Modernist, ed. Pasler, Jann. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. 82–88.Google Scholar
Somfai, Laszlo. ‘Symphony of Wind Instruments (1920). Observations on Stravinsky's Organic Construction’, Studia Musica Academiae Scientarium Hungaricae 14/1–4 (1972), 355–83.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph N. ‘A Principle of Voice-Leading in the Music of Stravinsky’, Music Theory Spectrum 4 (1982), 106–24.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor. Confidences sur la musique: Propos recueillis (1912–1939), ed. Dufour, Valérie. Paris: Actes Sud, 2013.Google Scholar
Stravinsky, Igor. Poetics of Music in the Form of Six Lessons, trans. Knodel, Arthur and Dahl., Ingolf Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard. ‘Catching Up with Rimsky-Korsakov’, Music Theory Spectrum 33/2 (2011), 169–85.Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Pieter C. The Music of Igor Stravinsky. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Pieter C. Stravinsky and the Rite of Spring: The Beginnings of a Musical Language. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Pieter C., and McGinness, John. Stravinsky and the Russian Period: Sound and Legacy of a Musical Idiom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Walser, Robert. ‘Popular Music Analysis: Ten Apothegms and Four Instances’, in Analyzing Popular Music, ed. Moore, Allan F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 16–38.Google Scholar
Walsh, Stephen. ‘Stravinsky's Symphonies: Accident or Design?’ in Analytical Strategies and Musical Interpretation: Essays on Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Music, ed. Ayrey, Craig and Everist, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 35–71.Google Scholar
Walsh, Stephen. ‘Key Igor Stravinsky Work Found after 100 Years’. The Observer, Sunday 6 September 2015.Google Scholar
Walsh, Stephen. ‘Lost Stravinsky Piece Performed for First Time Since Rediscovery’. The Guardian, Saturday 3 December 2016.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, Marianne. Debussy's Late Style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
White, Eric Walter. Stravinsky's Sacrifice to Apollo. London: Hogarth Press, 1930.Google Scholar
White, Eric Walter. Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works. London: Faber & Faber, 1966.Google Scholar