Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:48:03.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberalism and the Establishment of Collective Security in British Foreign Policy (The Alexander Prize Essay)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Joseph Charles Heim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps no phrase is so evocative of inter-war British foreign policy as is ‘collective security.’ Yet surprisingly, despite this obvious centrality—what political figure did not at one time or another express his views regarding collective security?—there remains a missing dimension regarding our understanding of the part collective security played in British foreign policy during the critical decades of the nineteen-twenties and nineteen-thirties.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 5 , December 1995 , pp. 91 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goldstein, E., Winning the Peace: British Diplomatic Strategy. Peace Planning, and the Paris Peace Conference 1916–1920 (Oxford, 1920)Google Scholar; Yearwood, P., ‘“On the Safe and Right lines:” the Doyd George government and the origins of the League of Nations, 1916–1918,’ Historical Journal, xxxii (1989), 131–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Freeden, M., Liberalism divided (Oxford, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clarke, P. F., Liberals and Social Democrats (Cambridge, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bentley, M., The Liberal mind (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar; Wilson, T., The downfall of the Liberal party (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Bernstein, G., ‘Yorkshire Liberalism during the first world war,’ Historical Journal, xxxii (1989), 107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Grey to Crewe, 2 February 1917, Crewe Papers, Cambridge University Library (CUL), MS C/17.

4 Turner, J., British politics and the great war (1992), 124–151Google Scholar.

5 Notes by Edwin Montagu, 9 December 1916, Montagu Papers, Trinity College Cambridge, MS AS 1/10.

6 Grey to Murray, 21 January 1918, Murray papers, Bodleian Library, MS 139 fo. 10.

7 Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 5th sen, cxxv. 2347–2349, 9 05 1918Google Scholar.

8 Crewe to Asquith, 31 May 1917, Asquith Papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 18 fos. 8–9.

9 Grey to Murray, 21 January 1918, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 139 fo. 10.

10 Acland to Maclean, 17 November 1919, Maclean papers, Bodl. Lib., MS c. 465 fo. 212.

11 Diary entry of M. Hankey, 23 November 1918, Hankey Papers, Churchill College, Cambridge, MS 1/5 fo. 55.

12 Nicolson, H., Peacemaking 1919 (1933)Google Scholar; Keynes, J. M., The economic consequences of the peace (1920)Google Scholar.

13 A printed copy of this letter is Bryce Papers, Bodl. Lib., MS UB 59. Also see Asquith to Bryce, 21 May 1919, Bryce papers, Bodl. Lib., MS UB 1.

14 Cecil, Lord Robert, cabinet memorandum, Proposals for diminishing the occasion of future wars, 10 1916Google Scholar, Cecil of Chelwood papers, British library, Additional MS 51102.

15 Cecil to Salisbury, 18 May 1921, CC, BL, Add. MS 51085 fos. 92–97; Lord Robert Cecil, memorandum on the political situation, ASQ, Bodl. Lib., MS 34fos. 9–11.

16 Viscount Cecil of Chelwood, , All the Way (1949), 136–137Google Scholar.

17 Asquith, ‘Notes of 5 July 1921,’ Asquith papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 34 fos. 22–23.

18 Nicolson, H., Peacemaking 1919 (1934)Google Scholar; Steiner, Z. and Dockrill, M., ‘The Foreign Office at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919,’ International History Review, ii (1982), 55–86Google Scholar; Sharp, A. J., ‘The Foreign Office in eclipse 1919–1922,’ History, lxi (1976), 198–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Hardinge to Curzon, 10 June 1920, Hardinge papers, Cambridge University library (CUL), MS 45. fo. 38.

20 Grey to Hardinge, 28 September 1920, Hardinge papers, CUL, MS 43 fos. 19–20.

21 Grey to Hankey, 8 November 1922, Hankey papers, Churchill College, Cambridge, MS 4/14 fo. 4. Also see Grey to Maclean, 25 August 1924, Maclean papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 467 fo. 114.

22 Nicolson, H., Curzon: The last phase 1919–1924 (1934), 384–387Google Scholar.

23 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), li, 27 June 1922, col. 43 (Grey); Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), li, 10 June 1922, cols. 18–19 (Crewe); Cecil to Salisbury, 18 May 1921, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51085 fo. 93.

24 Salisbury, Lord, ‘Disintegration,’ Quarterly Review, clvi, (10 1883), 578Google Scholar.

25 Cecil to H. Gladstone, 10 April 1924, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51164 fo. 36.

26 Cecil to H. Gladstone, 22 April 1924, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51164 fo. 39.

27 Cecil to Geoffrey Dawson, 8 December 1923, Dawson papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 70 fo. 60.

28 Cecil to G. Dawson, 11 December 1923, Dawson papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 70 fos. 68–69.

29 Cecil to Salisbury, 18 May 1921, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add MS 51085 fos. 92–97.

30 Cecil to Asquith, 11 May 1922, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51073.

31 Keynes, J. M.Essays in Biography (1953), 47Google Scholar.

32 Hamer, D. A., Liberal Politics in the age of Gladstone and Rosebety, (Oxford, 1972), 51Google Scholar.

33 Gladstone, W. E., ‘The paths of honour and shame,’ The Nineteenth Century, xiii (1878), 591–592Google Scholar.

34 W. E. Gladstone, ibid., 592.

35 W. E. Gladstone, ibid., 592.

36 Gladstone, W. E., The Eastern Crisis: a Utter to the Duke of Westminster (1897), 2Google Scholar.

37 Mill, J. S., On Liberty, Collected Works (CW), xviii, (Toronto 1969–1983), 266–268Google Scholar; Principles of political economy, CW, x, (Toronto, 1969–1983), 107–112Google Scholar.

38 Mill, J. S., Political essays, CW, x, (Toronto, 1969–1983), 123–124, 320–330Google Scholar;Considerations on representative government, CW xix, (Toronto, 1969–1983), 448–450Google Scholar.

39 Mill, J. S., Considerations on representative government, CW, xix, (Toronto, 1969–1983), 448–449Google Scholar.

40 Mill, J. S., On Liberty, CW, xviii, (Toronto, 1969–1983), 369Google Scholar.

41 Nation and Athenaeum, (11 August 1923), 597.

42 Roach, J. P., ‘Victorian universities and the national intelligentsia,’ Victorian Studies, ii (1959), 144–146Google Scholar.

43 Matthew, H. C. G., The Liberal Imperialists: the ideas and politics of a post-Gladstonian elite, (Oxford, 1972), 287–289Google Scholar.

44 Bentley, M., ‘Liberal politics and the Grey conspiracy of 1921,’ H.J., xx (1977), 461–478Google Scholar.

45 Grey to Cecil, 12 April 1921, (not sent), Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51073.

46 Lord Robert Cecil, memorandum on the political situation, Asquith papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 34 fos. 9–11; an additional copy is found in Maclean papers, Bodl. Lib., MS c. 466 fos. 50–52.

47 Nation and Athenaeum, (10 June 1922) 369–370.

48 The political diaries of C. P. Scott, ed. Wilson, T. (1977), 432Google Scholar.

49 Nation and Athenaeum (29 April 1922), 143.

50 Birkenhead, Lord, Contemporary Personalities (1924), 100Google Scholar.

51 Trevelyan, G., Grey of Falbdon (1937), 337Google Scholar; Robbins, K., Grey of Fallodon (1971), 345–372Google Scholar.

52 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), lii, 13 December 1922, cols. 407–409 (Salisbury).

53 A. Chamberlain to D'Abernon, 2 April 1925, Crewe papers, CUL, MS C/8.

54 A. Chamberlain to Crewe, 27 June 1925, Crewe papers, CUL, MS C/8.

55 Murray, G., ‘Notes on Lord Grey,’ 30 08 1935Google Scholar, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 139 fos. 107–111.

56 Grey to Murray, 22 August 1924, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib. MS 139 fo. 60.

57 Grey to Asquith, 28 January 1925, Asquith papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 35 fos. 1–4.

58 Lord Grey of Fallodon, , Wordsworth's Prelude, (1923), 6Google Scholar.

59 Asquith to Cecil, 19 October 1922, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51073.

60 Asquith, notes for an Oxford lecture, Asquith papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 63 fos. 81–135.

61 Cecil to Salisbury, 18 May 1921, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL Add. MS 51085 fos. 92–97.

62 Acton, Lord, The History of Freedom and Other Essays (1907), 53Google Scholar.

63 Morgan, K., Consensus and Disunity: The Lloyd George Coalition 1918–1922 (Oxford, 1978), 195Google Scholar.

64 Nicolson, H., Curzon: the last phase 1919–1924 (1934)Google Scholar; Steiner, Z. and Dockrill, M., ‘The Foreign Office Reforms 1919–1921,’ H.J., xvii (1974), 131–156Google Scholar.

65 Lord Grey of Fallodon, , ‘Some Thoughts on the Public Life,’ ThefifthEarl Grey lecture (1923)Google Scholar.

66 Lord Grey of Fallodon, , ‘Dedicatory speech on occasion of Chatham House being given to the Royal Institute,’ Journal of the British Institute of International Affairs (JBILA), ii (1923), 222–232Google Scholar.

67 Murray, G., The League of Nations and the democratic idea (1918), 12, 28Google Scholar; Percy, Lord Eustace, The responsibilities of the League (1919), 47Google Scholar.

68 Bryce, Lord, Essays and addresses in war-time (1918), 112Google Scholar; Cecil, Lord Robert, ‘The League of Nations and the rehabilitation of Europe,’ in Essays in Liberalism; the papers of the 1922 Liberal Summer School (1922), 1–18Google Scholar.

69 Pollard, A. F., ‘The Balance of Power,’ in Essays in Liberalism (London, 1922), 23Google Scholar.

70 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), liii, 20 April 1923, cols. 805–806 (Grey).

71 Cecil, Lord Robert, ‘Speech at Sunderland,’ The Times, 31 03 1925Google Scholar.

72 Grey, Viscount, The League of Nations (1918), 8–11Google Scholar.

73 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), xli, 22 July 1920, col. 440.

74 Murray, G., The League of Nations and the democratic idea (1918), 20Google Scholar.

75 Lord Robert Cecil, Committee of Imperial Defence (CED) memorandum, On the treaty of mutual assistance, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 3–23.

76 Private memorandum, Proposals for the avoidance of war, by the Bryce group, 24 02 1915, p. 8Google Scholar; Bryce papers, Bodl. Lib., MS UB 58.

77 Asquith's notes, n.d, Asquith papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 63 fos. 192–193; also see Grey's remarks in Hansard, 5th sen, (Lords), liii, 20 April 1923, cols. 798–813.

78 Bond, B., British Military Policy between the two world wars (Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar; Howard, M., The Continental Commitment (1972)Google Scholar.

79 Lord Balfour, cabinet memorandum, 15 September 1922, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51071–A fos. 81–82.

80 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords) liii, 21 March 1923, cols. 474–475.

81 See Baldwin, S., ‘Note of a conversation with Poincare,’ 19 09 1923Google Scholar, Baldwin papers, CUL, MS 108 fos. 3–37; and Tyrell to Baldwin, 13 September 1923, Baldwin papers, CUL, MS 128 fos. 48–49.

82 Cecil to Heaton-Ellis, April 1922, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51075 fos. 116–118.

83 Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), liii, 21 March 1923, cols. 502–503 (Grey); Hansard, 5th ser., (Lords), liii, 13 February 1923, cols. 20–25 (Grey).

84 Hansard, 5th sen, (Lords), liii, 21 March 1923, col. 502.

85 Lord Grey of Fallodon, , ‘The Dominions and foreign policy,’ JBIIA, ii (1924), 308–310Google Scholar.

86 Cecil, Lord Robert, CID memorandum, On a League ofNations plan for the reduction of armaments, 20 12 1922Google Scholar, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51103 fos. 1–2.

87 Hansard, 5th sen, (Lords), liii, 13 February 1923, cols. 30–31 (Grey); Cecil, Lord Robert, CID memorandum, On the treaty of mutual assistance, 6 06 1923Google Scholar, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS fos. 3–23.

88 Salisbury to Cecil, 9 October 1923, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS 51085 fos. 100–101.

89 Henderson, A., Labour and foreign affairs (1922), 9Google Scholar.

90 MacDonald, R., Pact or Protocol, (1925), 5Google Scholar.

91 Hankey to Smuts, 22 May 1924, Hankey papers, Churchill College, Cambridge, MS 4/16 fo. 139.

92 Cecil to Murray, 15 July 1924, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 186 fo. 110.

93 Interestingly, Grey remarked that at this point in time, ‘any exclusive alliance’ was ‘a lamentable failure,’ Grey to Murray, 1 February 1925, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 139 fo. 65.

94 Crowe to Baldwin, 14 March 1925, Baldwin papers, CUL, MS 115 fos. 63–65.

95 Churchill, W., ‘French and Belgian security,’ 24 02 1925Google Scholar, Public Record Office, Cabinet papers (CP) 118 (25).

96 Cecil to Churchill, 8 January 1929, Cecil of Chelwood papers, BL, Add. MS. 51073.

97 PRO, CP (116) 25, February 1925.

98 Hoare, S., ‘French and Belgian security,’ PRO CP (121) 25Google Scholar.

99 PRO CP 116 (25).

100 Telegram, Secretary of state Dominions affairs to Governors-General, 19 November 1925, Baldwin papers, CUL, MS in fos. 202–226.

101 Murray, G., ‘Address to American Foreign Policy Association’, 1926Google Scholar, Murray papers, Bodl. Lib., MS 109 fos. 149–158; Cecil, Viscount, All the Way (1949), 167–168Google Scholar.