Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:36:00.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infrastructure in the Making: The Chao Phraya Dam and the Dance of Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Jakkrit Sangkhamanee
Jakkrit Sangkhamanee*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Chulalongkorn University; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article explores the process behind the construction of the Chao Phraya Dam, the first World Bank-funded water infrastructure project in Thailand, developed during the 1950s. Employing Andrew Pickering's ‘dance of agency’ concept in examining the process of turning financial and technical assistance into a workable project, I argue that development infrastructure, like the Chao Phraya Dam, provides a space to explore the dialectic operations – accommodation and resistance – of agency and the unstable associations among diverse actors, expertise, institutions, and materials, as well as practices. Recounting the history of the dam in the making, I explore a series of entanglements through different dances of agency, namely initiation, assessment, mobilisation, negotiation, adjustment, confrontation, and settlement. Such a multiplicity of dances inside and in the making of infrastructure reflects the techno-political entanglement encompassing the manifold negotiation and adjustment of conflicting goals, interests, recognition, and cooperation among different agencies. The dam, often portrayed as an engineering achievement of the state, is in fact the result of unanticipated relations and the responses to the temporal emerging forms of practices.

Keywords

InfrastructureChao Phraya DamWater EngineeringDance of AgencyInfrastructural InversionThailand
Type
Articles
Information
TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 47 - 71
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Institute for East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bijker, Wiebe. 2007. “Dikes and dams, thick with politics.” Isis 98(1): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey. 1994. Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey, and Star, Susan. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummelhuis, Han ten. 2007. King of the Waters: Homan van der Heide and the Origin of Modern Irrigation in Siam. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Patrick. 2006. Science, Culture, and Modern State Formation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastering, Keller. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructural Space. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Penny, Jensen, Casper Bruun and Morita, Atsuro, eds. 2017. Infrastructure and Social Complexity: A Companion. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harvey, Penny, and Knox, Hannah. 2015. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Kregg. 2017. “Surveying the Future Perfect: Anthropology, Development, and the Promise of Infrastructure.” In Infrastructure and Social Complexity: A Companion, edited by Harvey, Penny, Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Morita, Atsuro, 40–50. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joyce, Patrick. 2013. The State of Freedom: A Social History of the British State Since 1800. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soyeun. 2010. “Greening the dam: The case of the San Roque multi-purpose project in the Philippines.” Geoforum 41(4): 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The politics and poetics of infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 1987. “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Bijker, Wiebie, Hughes, Thomas, and Pinch, Trevor, 111–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Eden, Marques, Ivan da Costa, and Holmes, Christina, eds. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, and Modernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morita, Atsuro. 2017. “River Basin: The Development of Scientific Concept and Infrastructures in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand.” In Infrastructure and Social Complexity: A Companion, edited by Harvey, Penny, Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Morita, Atsuro, 215–226. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mosse, David. 2003. The Rule of Water: Statecraft, Ecology, and Collective Action in South India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mrázek, Rudolf. 2002. Engineers of Happy Land: Technology and Nationalism in a Colony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra. 2009. Impossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on the Canal du Midi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2012. “The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency.” In Characterizing the Robustness of Science, edited by Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano, Nickles, Thomas, and Wimsatt, William, 317–327. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 292. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2015. “Science, Contingency and Ontology.” In Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem, edited by Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano, and Pickering, Andrew, 117–128. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard, and Merry, Sally. 2015. “A World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification.” In The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification, edited by Rottenburg, Richard, Merry, Sally E., Park, Sung-Joon, and Mugler, Johanna, 1–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Irrigation Department (RID). 1946. Report on the Construction Plan of Irrigation Project (The Chao Phraya Dam) 1947–1953. Bangkok: RID.Google Scholar
Royal Irrigation Department (RID). 1957. The Greater Chao Phya Project. Bangkok: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Sangkhamanee, Jakkrit. 2010. “ Hydraulics of Power and Knowledge: Water Management in Northeastern Thailand and the Mekong Region. ” PhD diss., Australian National University.Google Scholar
Sangkhamanee, Jakkrit. 2017. “An assemblage of Thai water engineering: The Royal Irrigation Department's Museum for Heavy Engineering as a parliament of things.” Engaging Science, Technology and Society 3: 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). 1951. Report on Preliminary Design of Chao Phya River Dam. Compiled by Coombs, H.C.. Denver: United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1950a. IBRD's Technical Report on the Chao Phya Irrigation, Drainage and Communication Project in Thailand. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1950b. Supplements to the Technical Reports on Thailand. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1950c. Report and Recommendations of the President to the Executive Directors on the Three Proposed Loans to Thailand. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1950d. Loan Agreement (Irrigation Project) Between the Kingdom of Thailand and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Dated October 27, 1950. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1953. First Loan Administration Report on the Three Loans to the Kingdom of Thailand of October 27, 1950. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1957a. Appraisal of the Bhumiphol (Yanhee) Multiple Purpose Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1957b. Report and Recommendations of the President to the Executive Directors on the Proposed Loans to the Bhumiphol Electricity Authority. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
NA SR The National Archives (Bangkok, Thailand), Prime Minister Office Records.Google Scholar
NA FO The National Archives (Kew, United Kingdom), Foreign Office.Google Scholar
NA SR The National Archives (Bangkok, Thailand), Prime Minister Office Records.Google Scholar
NA FO The National Archives (Kew, United Kingdom), Foreign Office.Google Scholar