Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:48.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defence of Southeast Asia: A Case for Methodological Regionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

Eric C. Thompson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Open nearly any general text on Southeast Asia and you will find that some space is taken up in the introduction assessing the reality and validity of the regional framework on which that text rests. Likewise, with the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), many scholars question whether or not the regional entity amounts to anything of any substance. In this article, I mount a defence of Southeast Asia as a regional framework in scholarship and draw attention to ASEAN as an evolving regional entity. While the concept of Southeast Asia among researchers and the politics of ASEAN are distinct issues, I treat them together in this article to highlight their interrelationship and parallels. My primary objective is to outline the displaced politics – of both academic and realpolitik varieties – embedded in deconstructive and dismissive critiques of both Southeast Asia and ASEAN. Critiques of both are not without value, as they sharpen our attention to processes through which supra-national regionalism is produced. Nevertheless, I argue that regionalism remains a valuable method in both politics and scholarship, in no small part as a counterweight to the hegemony of methodological nationalism in contemporary thought and research.

Keywords

ASEANSoutheast Asiaregionalismpoliticsmethodological nationalism
Type
Articles
Information
TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 1 , Special Issue 2: Redefining and Recontextualising Politics in Southeast Asia , July 2013 , pp. 281 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Embong, Abdul Rahman. 2009. Cross-border communities: Implications for bilateral relations and the ASEAN Community. In Yean, Tham Siew Ping, Lee Poh and Othman, Norani (eds.), Community in ASEAN: Ideas and Practices, pp. 118–135. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Abu Lughod, Lila. 1991. Writing against culture. In Fox, Richard G. (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, pp. 137–162. Santa Fe: School for American Research Publications.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2000. The Quest for Identity: International Relations in Southeast Asia. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alatas, Syed Hussein. 1977. The Myth of the Lazy Native. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal (ed.). 1973. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, Timothy. 2004. Contesting Malayness: Malay Identity across Boundaries. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1997. Area studies and the discipline: a useful controversy? PS: Political Science and Politics 30(2), 166–169.Google Scholar
Boomgaard, Peter. 2007. Southeast Asia: An Environmental History. Santa Barbara (CA): ABD-CLIO.Google Scholar
Charrier, Philip. 2001. ASEAN's inheritance: the regionalization of Southeast Asia, 1941–1961. The Pacific Review 14(3), 313–338.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, and Denham, Tim. 2010. Farming and language in island Southeast Asia: reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51(2), 223–256.Google Scholar
Emmerson, Donald K. 2007. Challenging ASEAN: a ‘topological’ view. Contemporary Southeast Asia 29(3), 424–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ellen L. 2008. Asia's New Regionalism. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Glassman, Jim. 2005. On the borders of Southeast Asia: Cold War geography and the construction of the Other. Political Geography 24(7), 784–807.Google Scholar
Glover, Ian, and Bellwood, Peter (eds.). 2004. Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Goh, Beng-Lan (ed.). 2011. Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.Google Scholar
Gupta, Avijit (ed.). 2005. The Physical Geography of Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajime, Shimizu. 2005. Southeast Asia as a regional concept in modern Japan. In Kratoska, Paul H., Raben, Remco and Nordholt, Henk Schulte (eds.), Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space, pp. 82–112. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, David Martin and Smith, Michael L.R. 2007. Constructing communities: the curious case of East Asian regionalism. Review of International Studies 33(1), 165–186.Google Scholar
King, Victor T. and Wilder, William. 2003. The Modern Anthropology of Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratoska, Paul H., Raben, Remco and Nordholt, Henk Schulte (eds.). 2005. Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor. 2003. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c.800–1830, Volume One. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Limqueco, Peter. 1987. Contradictions of development in ASEAN. Journal of Contemporary Asia 13(3), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, Chintamani. 1990. American Role in the Origin and Growth of ASEAN. New Delhi: ABC Publishing House.Google Scholar
Narine, Shaun. 2002. Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Osborne, Milton. 2004. Southeast Asia: An Introductory History (ninth edition). Crows News (NSW): Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 1998. The cosmopolitan vernacular. Journal of Asian Studies 57(1), 6–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2001. The death of Sanskrit. Comparative Studies in Society and History 43(2), 392–426.Google Scholar
Ragayah Haji Mat Zin. 2009. Poverty and Inequality Reduction in the ASEAN Community: Is Economic Integration a Possible Answer? In Yean, Tham Siew, Ping, Lee Poh and Othman, Norani (eds.), Community in ASEAN: Ideas and Practices, pp. 84–117. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Sandhu, K.S., Siddique, Sharon, Jeshurun, Chandran, Rajah, Ananda, Tan, Joseph L.H. and Thambipillai, Pushpa (eds.). 1992. The ASEAN Reader. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
SarDesai, D.R. 1997. Southeast Asia: Past and Present (fourth edition). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Shamsul, Amri Baharuddin. 1996. Nations-of-intent in Malaysia. In Tonnesson, Stein and Antlov, Hans (eds.), Asian Forms of the Nation, pp. 323–347. Surrey (UK): Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Siddique, Sharon and Kumar, Sree (eds.). 2003. The Second ASEAN Reader. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sidel, John. 2001. Book review: The Quest for Identity (by Amitav Acharya). Survival 43(4), 162.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Richard. 2008. The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge of ‘global’ governance. The Pacific Review 21(4), 451–468.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Heather. 2005. Contingent devices. In Kratoska, Paul H., Raben, Remco and Nordholt, Henk Schulte (eds.), Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space, pp. 20–59. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliacozzo, Eric (ed.). 2009. Southeast Asia and the Middle East: Islam, Movement and the Longue Durée. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, See Seng, and Acharya, Amitav (eds.). 2008. Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas. 2006. Regionalism in Southeast Asia: To Foster the Political Will. Abingdon and Oxfordshire: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarling, Nicholas. 2007. From SEAFET and ASA: precursors of ASEAN. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies 3(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Tham, Siew Yean, Ping, Lee Poh and Othman, Norani (eds.). 2009. Community in ASEAN: Ideas and Practices. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Thompson, Eric C., and Thianthai, Chulanee. 2008. Attitudes and Awareness towards ASEAN: Findings of a Ten-Nation Survey. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Thompson, Eric C. 2009. Southeast Asia. In Kitchen, Rob and Thrift, Nigel (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, pp. 248–254. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Thompson, Eric C. 2012. The world beyond the nation in Southeast Asian museums. Sojourn 27(1), 54–83.Google Scholar
Thongchai, Winichakul. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Thongchai, Winichakul. 2003. Writing at the interstices: Southeast Asian historians and postnational histories in Southeast Asia. In Ahmad, Abu Talib and Liok, Tan Ee (eds.), New Terrains in Southeast Asian History, pp. 3–29. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
van Schendel, Willem. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6), 647–668 (republished in Kratoska et al. 2005).Google Scholar
Vickers, Adrian. 2009. Southeast Asian studies after Said. Paper presented to the Arts Association, University of Sydney, 3 September 2009.Google Scholar