Although most occurrences of Ediacaran fossils are from shallow-shelf deposits, taxonomically-similar assemblages have recently been described from a 2.5 km-thick succession of dark mudstones and turbiditic sandstones in the Windermere Supergroup of the Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. The paleogeographic position (20-40 km seaward of the shelf edge), abundant evidence of mass flow, and the complete absence of in situ shallow-water features imply that deposition took place on a slope considerably below storm wave-base. Ediacaran fossils were not observed in axial trough deposits (lower parts of the Twitya and Sheepbed formations), but megafossils occur sporadically in lower to middle slope deposits higher in the same formations. Megafossils and trace fossils are present in upper slope settings (Blueflower Formation) at the top of the Ediacaran succession. The megafossil assemblage varies stratigraphically, but in all formations is dominated by discoid forms (e.g. Cyclomedusa, Ediacaria, Nimbia); frondose forms and vendomiids are very rare.

Megafossils are preserved mainly as positive features on the soles of thin turbidite beds. Most fossiliferous beds begin with the rippled layer of the turbidite (Tc), but a few begin with the graded (Ta) or parallel-laminated (Tb) layer. Consistent orientation and high relief of individuals, evidence of mutual deformation during growth of adjacent organisms, and other taphonomic features imply that virtually all of the taxa represent benthic polypoid and frond-like organisms (not jellyfish). Slump structures occur commonly in the sandstone fill of fossils, suggesting that many of the organisms were buried alive by the turbidite and later decomposed. Other individuals, even on the same bedding plane, exhibit graded to laminated fill identical to that of the overlying turbidite bed, indicating that the depressions on the sea bottom produced by these individuals were empty at the time of turbidite deposition. Escape structures are absent, suggesting that the Ediacaran organisms were not capable of burrowing up through even thin layers of sand.

Ediacaran megafossils are invariably preserved on black, wrinkled surfaces similar to those elsewhere interpreted as microbial mats. Molding of delicate features (including tentacles), preservation of open molds as negative epireliefs, and sedimentological evidence of considerable cohesion of these surfaces relative to the underlying turbiditic muds (Td,e) supports this interpretation, and suggests that microbial mats were as important in the preservation of these deep-water Ediacara faunas as they were in their shallow-water equivalents. The presence of the wrinkled mats and their associated Ediacaran fossils almost exclusively in the pyritic intervals of the succession suggests that both may have lived under exaerobic conditions in this deep-water setting.

Climactichnites Logan, 1860, is known only from its large trail up to 20 cm in width, a trace superficially resembling a rope ladder. Prominent lateral ridges are parallel throughout the length of the trail; they may be smooth and hemispherical in cross-section or crenulated, much like a pie crust. Between these ridges is a series of raised dune-like bars and furrows dug into the substrate. The bars and furrows show considerable individual variation between trails and also variation along a trail. Ovoid impressions are known which occur at the start of trails. The posterior of these impressions is well rounded; the anterior is triangular, and for a short distance from the impression, the trail is developed on only one side. One exceptionally preserved impression shows curved, closely spaced, fine lines parallel to the posterior.

The trails are found only in sandstone, and where they are present, they are abundant. Slightly equivocable evidence indicates a Dresbachian (early Late Cambrian) age for the occurrences in New York, Missouri, and Wisconsin; trails in Ontario and Quebec are less certainly dated. Desiccation cracks and air escape hole suggest that the trail was fully exposed to the atmosphere.

From this data, a large number of sketches were made to reconstruct an animal able to make such a trail. Each attempt produced new speculation on the morphology. In the final rendition, the animal is bilaterally symmetrical, broad and low. The integument is tough, and the sole bears a subcentral mouth anteriorward. Lateral flaps scraped and compressed damp sand to make the parallel ridges. The anterior was strongly musculated and thin. This anterior flap grasped the sediment, alternating on either side of the animal to pull the form forward when the lateral flaps were relaxed. Curved rows of cilia on the posterior moved loose sand into dunes between the furrows formed by the anterior flaps.

This reconstruction is like that of no other animal known in the Vendian or the Phanerozoic.

In the Proterozoic Clemente Formation at Cerro Rajon, south of Caborca, Sonora, we have collected sandstone beds that contain many small, sediment-filled structures. Each structure is a thin-walled, elongate sack, about 1.5 cm tall, oriented perpendicular to bedding. The sacklike structures are laterally flattened and roughly elliptical in transverse section, with the major axis of the ellipse measuring several mm and the minor axis 2-3 mm. The walls are not mineralized and consist of a thin layer of cryptocrystalline clay. One or both walls of each specimen is undulatory with a wavelength of 3-4 mm. The sacks are closed at the bottom, but appear to be open at the top, like an uninflated toy balloon. On the bottom surface of the sandstone bed, beneath each vertical sack structure, is a prolate ellipsoid-shaped sole mark. The long axis of each ellipsoid sole mark is parallel to the long axis of the associated sack structure, and the sole marks are oriented sub-parallel to one another on the surface of the bed. We tentatively interpret these structures to be the holdfasts of gregarious, attached, benthic organisms oriented sub-parallel to one another on the sea floor.

A preliminary study of carbon and oxygen isotope stratigraphy was carried out on the 2 km-thick Proterozoic through Lower Cambrian section at Cerro Rajon. Samples were collected every 50 m, and analyses were done in the laboratory of J.M. Hayes at Indiana University, whose assistance is gratefully acknowledged. The isotope record shows a primary signature for most of the section. Although the wide spacing of sample collection does not permit an unequivocal intercontinental correlation, a prominent negative δ13C excursion near the base of the Papalote Formation may correlate with similar excursions at the Vendian-Cambrian boundary on several continents. This would place the base of the Cambrian of the Caborca area several hundred meters lower than previously thought, but still several hundred meters above the possible body fossils of the Clemente Formation.

PALEONTOLOGICAL collecting, transport of fossil materials, and the ownership of paleontology collections are governed and affected by a wide range of laws and regulations, from land law to bequests. Compliance with all applicable laws can be confusing, especially when a collector has to negotiate Federal, state, local, tribal and international requirements.

Unlike archaeology, paleontology does not have a body of laws specific to fossil protection. Most legal problems in paleontology arise from land access and permission to collect on public lands, theft and trespass concerns, public trust violations, land title and rights, and related issues. In the United States, there are no definitive overarching statutes governing fossil resources per se as separate from other land resources.

All of the taphonomic and other factors involved in fossilization, exposure and collection of fossils affect the preservation state, the condition in which the fossils become available for collection. These factors also determine what should be done to, at the very least, at least maintain that preservation state, and ideally provide a stabilized specimen that can, if desired, be restored. Weathering of rocks and their contained fossils is always a combination of mechanical and chemical processes. The collection of fossils in the field, and later work in the laboratory, attempts to halt or slow those processes (Rixon, 1976; Converse, 1984).