Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:26:33.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex Differences in the Seasonal Distribution of Suicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

David Lester  and
Michael L. Frank
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An attempt was made to replicate in the USA sex differences reported for the seasonal distribution of suicide in the UK, Finland and Australia. No sex differences were found. Spring and late summer peaks were found for suicides by both males and females. The method of suicide was found to be an important factor in the seasonal distribution of the suicides of males and females.

Type
Brief Reports
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 153 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 115 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lester, D. (1971) Seasonal variation in suicidal deaths. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 627–628.Google Scholar
Lester, D. (1986) Seasonal variation in suicides for males and females. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 219.Google Scholar
Meares, R., Mendelsohn, F. & Milgrom-Friedman, J. (1981) A sex difference in the seasonal variation of suicide rate. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 321–325.Google Scholar
Nayha, S. (1982) Autumn incidence of suicides re-examined: data from Finland by sex, age and occupation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 512–517.Google Scholar
Parker, G. & Walter, S. (1982) Seasonal variation in depressive disorders and suicidal deaths in New South Wales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 626–632.Google Scholar
Skutsch, G. (1981) Sex difference in seasonal variations in suicide rate. British Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 80–81.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.