Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:58:41.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Predictability of Thought Disordered Speech in Schizophrenic Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Theo C. Manschreck
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 32 Fruit St., Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Brendan A. Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Mary E. Rucklos
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Mitzi T. White
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Summary

Previous research has resulted in inconsistent findings regarding the predictability of schizophrenic speech samples. It was hypothesized that the predictability of schizophrenic speech varies as a function of clinically manifest thought disorder. In an experiment based on the Cloze procedure, raters were asked to predict ten passages of schizophrenic speech and eight passages of normal speech under conditions of fourth- and fifth-word deletion. Differences emerged between the samples only for the fifth-word deletion procedure. When the schizophrenic samples were grouped according to the presence of thought disorder, thought-disordered speech was significantly less predictable than normal and non-thought disordered schizophrenic speech. Furthermore, non-thought-disordered schizophrenic speech was no less predictable than normal speech. It is concluded that schizophrenia should be more carefully defined and that thought disorder should be routinely assessed in future investigations.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amarel, M., Cheek, F. E. & Stierhem, R. J. (1966) Studies in the sources of variation in Cloze scores: I. The raters. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 444–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. & Fransella, F. (1966) A grid test of schizophrenic thought disorder. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 95102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheek, F. & Amarel, M. (1968) Studies in the sources of variation in Cloze scores: II. The verbal passages. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 424–30.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. & Payne, R. W. (1973) Language structure and predictability in overinclusive patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 643–52.Google Scholar
Macginitie, W. H. (1961) Contextual constraint in English prose paragraphs. Journal of Psychology, 51, 121–30.Google Scholar
Maher, B. (1972) The language of schizophrenia: a review and interpretation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 317.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E. & Roth, M. (1954) Clinical Psychiatry. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Rutter, D. R., Wishner, J., Koptynska, H. & Button, M. (1978) The predictability of speech in schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 228–32.Google Scholar
Rutter, D. R., Draffan, J. & Davies, J. (1977) Thought disorder and the predictability of schizophrenic speech. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 67–8.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. & Endicott, J. (1975) Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS), 2nd ed. New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1975) Research Diagnostic Criteria for a Selected Group of Functional Disorders, 2nd ed. New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. L. (1953) ‘Cloze Procedure’: a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–33.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. J., Campion, E. W. & Silverfarb, P. M. (1975) Sensorimotor functions and cognitive disturbance in psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1721.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.