Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:58:06.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality disorder and outcome in depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

R. Mulder*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Newton-Howes et al (Reference Newton-Howes, Tyrer and Johnson2006) attempted to definitively answer the question of whether comorbid personality disorder affects outcome in people with major depression. Their search strategy, study selection, data summary and analysis are clearly described. However, the heterogeneous nature of their data does not allow such definitive answers as they claim. As has been noted previously (Reference Charney, Nelson and QuinlanCharney et al, 1981; Reference Black, Bell and HulbertBlack et al, 1988; Reference MulderMulder, 2002) people with depression and comorbid personality disorders are less likely to receive drugs or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), precisely the treatments (as this meta-analysis reports) that they are more likely to respond to. Therefore, the only fair assessment of the effect of personality disorders on outcome is the randomised controlled trial (RCT). When the meta-analysis was confined to such trials the effect size was smaller but was still significant. A recent meta-analysis that restricted itself to RCTs of drug treatment reported no effect of recent comorbid personality disorder on outcome in people with depression (Reference Kool, Schoevers and de MaatKool et al, 2005). This suggests that better studies with more effective treatments will report less effect of comorbid personality disorder on outcome.

What does this mean clinically? Less than the authors claim, I would suggest. The sample size required to detect the difference between the outcome of patients with depression and personality disorders and similar patients but without personality disorder exceeds 1000 (and this by using all trials rather than just RCTs), suggesting minimal effect in normal clinical practice. Although it seems like a good idea, there is no evidence that targeting comorbid personality pathology is necessary and will result in better outcomes for those with depression. The numbers needed to show an effect of personality disorder on outcome suggest that a treatment trial specifically designed to look for a treatment effect would require such large numbers that it will never be performed.

What the meta-analysis suggests, along with many recent studies, is that good treatment of depression, particularly using drugs and ECT if indicated, will result for the most part in a similar outcome for people with and without personality disorders. Such treatments may in fact be effective for the comorbid personality disorder. Clinicians should be encouraged that aggressive treatment of mood disorder is likely to lead to a positive outcome in those with depression and comorbid personality disorder.

References

Black, D., Bell, S., Hulbert, J., et al (1988) The importance of Axis II in patients with major depression. A controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 14, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, D. S., Nelson, J. C. & Quinlan, D. M. (1981) Personality traits and disorder in depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 16011604.Google Scholar
Kool, S., Schoevers, R. A., de Maat, S., et al (2005) Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in depressed patients with and without personality disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 88, 269278.Google Scholar
Mulder, R. T. (2002) Personality pathology and treatment outcome in major depression: are view. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 359371.Google Scholar
Newton-Howes, G., Tyrer, P. & Johnson, T. (2006) Personality disorder and the outcome of depression: meta-analysis of published studies. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 1320.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.