Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:59:20.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Clinical Features and Outcome of Stupor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

M. P. Joyston-Bechal
M. P. Joyston-Bechal*
Affiliation:
The London Hospital, London, E.1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stupor is an unusual but striking phenomenon, generally recognized but difficult to define in precise clinical terms. A large literature exists on the diverse conditions in which it may occur, but there is little information on differentiating one cause from another, or on the prevalence of these causes. This insufficiency extends to the phenomenology of stupor, where descriptive criteria are not always adequate for separating stupor from allied states. Such difficulties are reflected in a current text book by Merskey and Tonge (1965). The authors only recognize stupor if there is total akinesis, where it is assumed that the diagnosis is schizophrenia. Depressive stupor is not recognized as an entity.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 112 , Issue 491 , October 1966 , pp. 967 - 981
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1966 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleuler, E. (1949). Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie, 8th ed. p. 387. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Breggin, P. (1965). “Sedative-like effect of epinephrine.” Arch. gen. Psychiat. (Chic.), 12, 255—259.Google Scholar
Cairns, H. et al. (1941). Brain, 64, 273.Google Scholar
Cravioto, H., Silberman, J., and Feigen, I. (1960). “A clinical and pathological study of akinetic mutism.” Neurology (Minneap.), 10, 10—21.Google Scholar
Garmany, G. (1955). “Acute anxiety and hysteria.” Brit. med. J., ii, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, M., Harpham, D., and Rosenblum, M. (1942). “Non-schizophrenic catatonic states.” N. Y. St. J. Med., 42, 624—627.Google Scholar
Holland de Jong, H. (1956). “Experimental catatonia in animals and induced catatonic stupor in man.” Dis. nerv. Syst. (April) 17, 135—139.Google Scholar
Hoch, A. (1921). Benign Stupors: a Study of a New Manic-depressive Reaction Type. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hoenig, J., and Toakley, J. G. (1959). “The diagnosis of stupor.” Psychiat. et Neurol., 137, 128—144.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1913—1946). Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Translated as General Psychopathology 1962. Pp. 601–602.Google Scholar
Kreitman, N., Sainsbury, P., Morrissey, J., Towers, J., and Scrivener, J. (1961). “The reliability of psychiatric assessment: an analysis.” J. ment. Sci., 107, 887—908.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. (1934). “Melancholia: a clinical survey of depressive states.” J. ment. Sci., 80, 277—378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merskey, H., and Lawton Tonge, W. (1965). Psychiatric Illness. 226–227. London.Google Scholar
Neustatter, W. L. (1942). “A case of hysterical stupor recovering after cardiazol treatment.” J. ment. Sci., 88, 440—443.Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. L. (1935). “A follow-up study of Hoch's ‘benign stupor’ cases.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 92, 531—558.Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. L. (1937). “A, statistical study of benign stupor in five State hospitals.” Psychiat. Quart., 11, 436—444.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. O., and Fonda, C. P. (1956). “The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis: a new look.” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 52, 262—267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. (1959). “An investigation and survey of 27 cases of akinesis with mutism (stupor).” J. ment. Sci., 105, 1088—1094.Google Scholar
Weinstein, E. A., Kahn, R. C., Slote, W. H. (1955). “Withdrawal, inattention, and pain asymbolia.” Arch. Neurol. (Chic.). 74, 235—248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D., and Parsons-Smith, G. (1951). “Thalamic activity in stupor.” Brain, 74, 377—398.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.