Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:07:20.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic Psychoanalytic Concepts: VI. Acting Out

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. Sandler ,
A. Holder  and
C. Dare
J. Sandler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
A. Holder
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
C. Dare
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We have previously suggested that a number of psychoanalytic concepts have undergone changes of meaning when extended to wider settings both within psychoanalysis and outside it (Sandler, Dare, and Holder, 1970a, b; Sandler, Holder and Dare, 1970a, b, c). This has led to situations in which the same term can have a variety of meanings attached to it, with consequent confusion and loss of precision. A clear example of this is the concept of transference, which is now given a wide range of meanings, including that of being simply a synonym for ‘relationship'—a usage substantially different from its original meaning (Sandler, Dare and Holder, 1970b).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 117 , Issue 538 , September 1970 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abt, L., and Weissman, S. (ed.) (1965). Acting Out. Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Balint, M. (1968). The Basic Fault, Therapeutic Aspects of Regression. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bellak, L. (1965). ‘The concept of acting-out: theoretical considerations’, in Acting Out. Theoretical and Clinical Aspects, ed. by Abt, L. and Weissman, S., New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Blos, P. (1966). Discussion remarks. In A Developmental Approach to Problems of Acting Out, ed. Rexford, E. Monographs of the Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, No. 1.Google Scholar
Deutsch, H. (1966). A Developmental Approach to Problems of Acting Out, ed. Rexford, E. Monographs of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, No. 1.Google Scholar
Eidelberg, L. (ed.) (1968). Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fenichel, O. (1945). ‘Neurotic acting out.’ Psychoanal. Rev., 32, 197–206.Google Scholar
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Freud, A. (1968). ‘Acting out.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49, 165–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Freud, S. (1901). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Standard Edition, 6.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1905). ‘Fragment on an analysis of a case of hysteria.’ Standard Edition, 7, 7–122.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1914). ‘Remembering, repeating and working-through.’ Standard Edition, 12, 147–56.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Standard Edition, 18, 7–64.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism, Standard Edition, 23, 7–137.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1940). An Outline of Psycho-Analysis, Standard Edition, 23, 144–207.Google Scholar
Greenacre, P. (1950). ‘General problems of acting out.’ Psychoanal. Quart., 19, 455–67.Google Scholar
Greenson, R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psycho-Analysis, Vol. 1, London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Imago, 1958.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1944). ‘Psychoanalysis and sociology’, in Essays on Ego Psychology, London: Hogarth, 19–36: 1964.Google Scholar
Holder, A. (1970). ‘Conceptual problems of acting out in children.’ J. Child Psychother., 2, No. 4.Google Scholar
Limentani, A. (1966). ‘A re-evaluation of acting out in relation to working through.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 47, 274–82.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. (1967). The Psychoanalytical Process, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Rangell, L. (1968). ‘A point of view on acting out.’ Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 49, 195–201.Google Scholar
Rexford, E. (1966). ‘A survey of the literature’, in A Developmental Approach to Problems of Acting Out, ed. Rexford, E. Monographs of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, No. 1.Google Scholar
Rosen, J. (1965). ‘The concept of “acting-in”’, in Acting Out, ed. Abt, L. and Weissman, S., New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, H. (1965). Psychotic States, Ch. 11 ‘An investigation into the need of neurotic and psychotic patients to act out during analysis.’ London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Dare, C., and Holder, A. (1970a). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: I. The extension of clinical concepts outside the psychoanalytic situation.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 551–54.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Dare, C., and Holder, A. (1970b). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: III. Transference.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 667–72.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Holder, A., and Dare, C. (1970a). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: II. The treatment alliance.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 555–58.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Holder, A., and Dare, C. (1970b). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: IV. Counter-transference.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 117, 83–88.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Holder, A., and Dare, C. (1970c). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts: V. Resistance.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 117, 215–21.Google Scholar
Zeligs, M. (1957). ‘Acting in.’ J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 5, 685–706.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.