Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:55:36.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self Concepts and the Stutterer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Fay Fransella
Fay Fransella*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Fund, Department of Psychiatry, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, S. W. 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Research in stuttering can be divided into two broad categories. The focus of attention has either been on the way the stutterer speaks or on the sort of person he is. In the first case, investigators have sought to isolate those conditions under which the stutterer's blocks, repetitions, or prolongations can be modified. For instance, there are studies on the effects of varying the size of the audience (e.g. Siegel and Haugen, 1964; Shulman, 1955), of providing delayed auditory feedback (e.g. Lee, 1951; Neeley, 1961) or various levels of noise (e.g. Mariast and Hutton, 1957; Sutton and Chase, 1961), and on the relationship between number of stutters and rhythmic speech (e.g. Barber, 1940; Fransella and Beech, 1965).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 517 , December 1968 , pp. 1531 - 1535
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1963). “The genesis of schizophrenic thought disorder: A serial invalidation hypothesis.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. (1965). “The rationale and clinical relevance of repertory grid technique.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, V. B. (1940). “Studies in the psychology of stuttering: XVI. Rhythm as a distraction in stuttering.” J. Sp. Dis., 5, 29–42.Google Scholar
Beech, H. R., and Fransella, Fay (1968). Research and Experiment in Stuttering. Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
Bender, J. (1942). “The stuttering personality.” Amer. J. Orthopsychiatry, 12, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coriat, I. H. (1943). “The psychoanalytic conception of stammering.” New. Child., 2, 167–171.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. E., and Wepman, J. M. (1951). “An exploratory investigation of the self-concept of stutterers.” J. Sp. Dis., 26, 110–114.Google Scholar
Fransella, Fay (1965a). “The effects of imposed rhythm and certain aspects of personality on the speech of stutterers.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, London.Google Scholar
Fransella, Fay (1965b). “Experimental evaluation of speech correction semantic differential.” Speech Monogr., 32, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransella, Fay “The stutterer as subject or object.” Proc. Int. Symp. on Stuttering and Behaviour Therapy, 1966. (In press.) Google Scholar
Fransella, Fay and Adams, B. (1966). “An illustration of the use of repertory grid technique in the clinical setting.” Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 5, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransella, Fay and Beech, H. R. (1965). “An experimental analysis of the effect of rhythm on the speech of stutterers.” Behav. Res. Ther., 3, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Vols. I and II. Norton.Google Scholar
Kogan, N., and Wallach, M. (1961). “Age changes in values and attitudes.” J. Geront., 14, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. S. (1951). “Artificial stutter.” J. Sp. Hear. Dis., 16, 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariast, J. A., and Hutton, C. (1957). “Effects of auditory masking upon the speech of stutterers.” J. Sp. Hear. Dis., 22, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeley, J. N. (1961). “A study of the speech behaviour of stutterers and non-stutterers under normal and delayed auditory feedback.” J. Sp. Hear. Dis. Monogr., Suppl. No. 7.Google Scholar
Osgood, G. E. (1962). “On the generality of affective meaning systems.” Amer, Psychologist, 17, 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, G. E. Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, Univ. Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shearer, W. M. (1961). “A theoretical consideration of the self-concept and body image in stuttering therapy.” Amer. Sp. Hear. Assoc., 3, 115–116.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J. G. (1954). “An integration of psychotherapy and speech therapy through the conflict theory of stuttering.” J. Sp. Hear. Dis., 19, 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, E. (1955). “Factors influencing the variability of stuttering.” In Stuttering in Children and Adults (Ed. Johnson, Wendell). Univ. Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, G. M., and Haugen, D. (1964). “Audience size and variations in stuttering behaviour.” J. Sp. Hear. Res., 7, 381–388.Google Scholar
Smith, R. G. (1962). “A semantic differential for speech correction concepts.” Speech Monogr., 29, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, S., and Chase, R. A. (1961). “White noise and stuttering.” J. Sp. Hear. Res., 4, 72.Google Scholar
Van Riper, C. (1947). Speech Correction. New York.Google Scholar
Wallen, V. A. (1960). “Q,-technique study of the selfconcepts of adolescent stutterers and non-stutterers.” Dissert. Abstr., 20, 3392.Google Scholar
Zelen, S. L., Sheehan, J. G., and Buoental, J. F. T. (1954). “Self-perceptions in stuttering.” J. clin. Psychol., 10, 70–72.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.