Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:56:19.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male-Female Differences in Underwater Sensory Isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Cathryn Walters ,
Oscar A. Parsons  and
Jay T. Shurley
Cathryn Walters
Affiliation:
Behavioral Science Laboratory of the Senior Medical Investigator, Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A
Oscar A. Parsons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Neurology and Behavioral Sciences, University of Oklahoma Medical Center, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A
Jay T. Shurley
Affiliation:
Behavioral Science Laboratory, Research Service, Veterans Administration Hospital; University of Oklahoma, School of Medicine, Oklahoma City 4, Oklahoma, U.S.A
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the pioneering studies of Hebb and his associates (2) on the effects of sensory deprivation on human beings, numerous investigators have conducted experimental studies under varying conditions in an effort to establish consistent trends in behaviour of subjects exposed to such conditions. Since only two other laboratories, both using male subjects, have reported underwater studies in deprivation (1, 5), an attempt to replicate our findings of sex differences in response to the situation by use of this method seemed to be in order.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 110 , Issue 465 , March 1964 , pp. 290 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Camberari, J. D. (1958). The Effects of Sensory Isolation on Suggestible and Non-Suggestible Psychology Graduate Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.Google Scholar
2 Heron, W., Bexton, W. H., and Hebb, D. O. (1953). “Cognitive effects of a decreased variation in the sensory environment.” Amer. Psychol., 3, 366.Google Scholar
3 Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). “Two-factor index of social position”, in Boek, W. E., Lawson, E. D., Van Kaver, A., and Sussman, M. D.: Social Class, Maternal Health, and Child Welfare. (Mimeographed.) Albany, N.Y.: New York State Department of Health.Google Scholar
4 Kaoan, J., and Moss, H. J. (1962). Birth to Maturity: A Study in Psychological Development. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
5 Lilly, J. C. (1956). “Mental effects of reduction of ordinary levels of physical stimuli on intact, healthy persons.” Psychiat. Res. Rep. Amer. Psychiat. Ass., 5, 1–28.Google Scholar
6 Pine, F., and Holt, R. R. (1960). “Creativity and primary process: a study of adaptive regression.” J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 61, 370–379.Google Scholar
7 Rooet, P. M. Thesaurus. Ed.: Morehead, A. H. New York: New American Library of World literature., 1962.Google Scholar
8 Shurley, J. T. (1960). “Profound experimental sensory isolation.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 116, 539–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Terman, L. M., and Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Walters, Cathryn, Shurley, J. T., and Parsons, O. A. (1962). “Differences in male and female responses to underwater sensory deprivation: an exploratory study.” J. New. Ment. Dis., 135, 302–310.Google Scholar
11 Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Herzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., and Wapner, S. (1954). Personality Through Perception. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.