Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-5wl6q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T06:30:08.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Prospects of Large Surveys in Astronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

M. Harwit*
Affiliation:
511 H Street, SW, Washington, DC, 20024-2725

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Major astronomical discoveries of the past have been closely linked with the implementation of strikingly powerful new observational techniques in astronomy. Surveys, in general, were not as likely to lead to the discovery of new phenomena. In recent years, however, many far-reaching instrumental advances have been incorporated into observatories in space, whose mission, in part, was to conduct unbiased surveys. Here, we provide a review of some of the successes of earlier surveys, with the purpose of identifying the relative extent to which increased instrumental capabilities, as contrasted to increased sky coverage or numbers of sources observed, may be expected to lead to the discovery of new phenomena. A similar comparison can be made of the extent to which these two approaches—emphasis on instrumental capabilities, as contrasted to emphasis on sky coverage— also contribute to an increase in astrophysical understanding. Here, the distinction needs to be made between discovering a new phenomenon and understanding its underlying processes.

Type
Part 1. General Sky Survey Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998 

References

Harwit, M. “Cosmic Discovery”, Basic Books, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, G. and Leighton, R.B. “Two Micron Sky Survey”, NASA SP-3047, Washington, D.C., 1969.Google Scholar
ESA Report to COSPAR 1996, page 36.Google Scholar
Harwit, M. and Sloane, N.J.A. “Hadamard Transform Optics”, Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar