Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:17:07.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5. The axisymmetric case in hydromagnetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

S. Chandrasekhar
Affiliation:
Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago, U.S.A.
Kevin H. Prendergast
Affiliation:
Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent work at the Yerkes Observatory has been concerned with the study of configurations in which the magnetic and velocity fields possess a common axis of symmetry. In those cases where the density ρ may be assumed constant, it has proved advantageous to employ a representation suggested by Lüst and Schlüter[1]: in cylindrical co-ordinates (ω, ϕ, z) let and where is a unit vector and T, P, V, and U are independent of the azimuthal angle Φ. The hydrodynamic equation may then be replaced by the pair of equations (cf. Ghandrasekhar [2]) and where Δ5 is the Laplacian operator in 5 dimensions. The equation for the magnetic field, may similarly be replaced by the pair of equations and

Type
Part I: Magneto-Hydrodynamics
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958 

References

1. Lüst, R. and Schlüter, A. Zs. f. Ap. 34, 263, 1954.Google Scholar
2. Chandrasekhar, S. Astrophys. J. 124, 232, 1956.Google Scholar
3. Chandrasekhar, S. and Prendergast, K. H. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. , 42, 5, 1956.Google Scholar
4. Chandrasekhar, S. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 42, 1, 1956.Google Scholar
5. Prendergast, K. H. Astrophys. J. 123, 498, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sykes, J. B. Astrophys. J. 125, 615, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cowling, T. G. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 94, 39, 1934.Google Scholar
8. Backus, G. and Chandrasekhar, S. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. , 42, 105, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Chandrasekhar, S. Astrophys. J. 124, 244, 1956.Google Scholar
10. Backus, G. Astrophys. J. 125, 500, 1957.Google Scholar
11. Trehan, S. K. Astrophys. J. 126, 429, 1957.Google Scholar