Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:52:45.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36. The 27-day variation in cosmic ray intensity and in geomagnetic activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Scott E. Forbush*
Affiliation:
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington D.C., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity, at Huancayo, Peru, and its phase relative to that for the 27-day wave in international magnetic character figure (ICF) is determined from results of harmonic analysis of data for each of 246 intervals (or solar rotations) of 27 days. From these data, the variability of which is essential for tests of statistical significance, the amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity and its phase relative to that in geomagnetic activity is determined for each of three groups of solar rotations selected according to the average of the amplitudes of the 27-day waves in magnetic activity. A fourth group contained only 27-day intervals in which large cosmic ray decreases occurred. Relative to that in magnetic activity, the phase of the 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity is found for the averages, to be the same for the four groups.

The maxima of the average cosmic ray waves occur about 1·5 days after the minima of the corresponding waves in ICF. In general, the amplitude of the average 27-day wave in cosmic ray intensity, in the co-ordinate system in which its phase is relative to that of the 27-day wave in ICF tends to be greater for the selected groups of rotations with larger average ICF amplitudes. For most years near sunspot minimum the amplitude of the 27-day cosmic ray wave does not differ significantly from zero.

Bartels found for 27-day waves in ICF the effective number of statistically independent 27-day waves for N successive solar rotations to be N/3; the number found for cosmic ray intensity is N/2. Thus, on the average the 27-day recurrence tendency is less for cosmic ray intensity than for magnetic activity.

Type
Part V: Electromagnetic State in Interplanetary Space
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958 

References

1. Forbush, Scott E. J. Geophys. Res. 59, no. 4, 525–42, 1954.Google Scholar
2. Morrison, P. Phys. Rev. 101, no. 4, 1397–404, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Forbush, Scott E. Transactions Washington Meeting, 1939; Internat. Union Geod. Geophys. Assoc. Terr. Mag. Electr., Bull. no. 11, 438–52, 1940.Google Scholar
4. Chapman, S. and Bartels, J. Geomagnetism (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1940).Google Scholar
5. Bartels, J. J. Geophys. Res. 40, no. 1, 160, 1935.Google Scholar
6. Bartels, J. Beitr. Geophys. 28, 110, 1930.Google Scholar
7. Simpson, J. Phys. Rev. 94, 426–40, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bartels, J. Presented at the Symposium on Geophysics, April 1956. (To be published in Proceedings National Academy of Sciences.) Google Scholar