Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:55:24.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

22. On the magnetic fields of novae and super-novae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

E. R. Mustel
E. R. Mustel*
Affiliation:
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Crimea, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is a development of the hypothesis, suggested earlier by the author, namely that novae possess a large general magnetic field. This hypothesis explains the following facts: (a) effects of the retardation of matter in novae before light maximum, (b) a preferential ejection of matter from novae in two diametrically opposite directions during an outburst, and (c) formation of rings and equatorial belts after light maximum, observed in N Aql 1918 and N Her 1934. These rings and belts are formed due to the fact that the general magnetic field of new stars deflects condensations of continuous ejection (the diffuse-enhanced and Orion spectra) towards the equator.

Magnetic fields inside novae must be ‘tangled’. This explains (a), as well as the difference between cases (b) and (c).

The structure of envelopes, ejected by novae, must reflect the presence of tangled magnetic fields. According to G. A. Shajn this is confirmed for super-novae, the envelopes of which may be studied in detail.

Type
Part III: Stellar Magnetism
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 6: Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics , 1958 , pp. 193 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958 

References

1. Mustel, E. R. A.J. U.S.S.R. 24, 280, 1947.Google Scholar
2. Mustel, E. R. Publ. Crim. Astroph. Obs. 4, 152, 1949.Google Scholar
3. Mustel, E. R. Communications for the Symposium on Non-stable Stars (Moscow, 1955), p. 130.Google Scholar
4. Mustel, E. R. Vistas in Astronomy , vol. 2, ed. by Beer, A., Pergamon Press, London, 1956.Google Scholar
5. Alfvén, H. Cosmical Electrodynamics (Oxford University Press, 1950).Google Scholar
6. Mustel, E. R. A.J. U.S.S.R. 33, 182, 1956.Google Scholar
7. A communication in Sky and Telescope, 12, 12, 1952.Google Scholar
8. Kipper, A. J. Trans of the 4th Conference on Problems of Cosmogony (Moscow, 1955), p. 425.Google Scholar
9. McLaughlin, D. B. Publ. Obs. Michigan , 8, 149, 1943.Google Scholar
10. Mustel, E. R. A.J. U.S.S.R. 24, 97 and 155, 1947.Google Scholar
11. Problems of Cosmical Aerodynamics , Proceedings of the Symposium held in Paris, Dayton, Ohio, 1951.Google Scholar
12. Weaver, H. I.A.U. Transactions , vol. 9 (Dublin, 1955), Cambridge University Press, 1957, Report at the meeting of Commission 36 a. Google Scholar
13. Wyse, A. B. Lick Obs. Bull. 14, pt. 3, 1939.Google Scholar
14. Mustel, E. R. Publ. Crim. Astroph. Obs. 6, 144, 1951.Google Scholar
15. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, 381, 1955.Google Scholar
16. Dombrovsky, V. A. C.R. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 94, 1021, 1954.Google Scholar
17. Oort, J. and Walraven, Th. B.A.N. 12, 285, 1956.Google Scholar
18. Shajn, G. A., Pikelner, S. B. and Ikhsanov, R. N. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, 395, 1955.Google Scholar
19. Vashakidze, M. A. A.C. U.S.S.R. no. 147, 11, 1954.Google Scholar
20. Artsimovich, L. A. Nuclear Energy, U.S.S.R. no. 3, 1956.Google Scholar
21. McLaughlin, D. D. Astrophys. J. 117, 279, 1953.Google Scholar
22. Shklovsky, I. S. A.J. U.S.S.R. 30, 15, 1953.Google Scholar
23. Walker, M. Astrophys. J. 123, 68, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar