Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:47:27.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21. On the magnetic fields in interstellar space and in nebulae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G. A. Shajn*
Affiliation:
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Crimea, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some aspects of the problem of magnetic fields in the interstellar space and in the nebulae are discussed in this paper. Our observational basis are the numerous photographs of the nebulae in Hα and other rays, taken with high-speed 450 and 640 mm cameras.

The greatly elongated shape of many emission nebulae is interpreted as a result of three factors, the effect of the magnetic field, the macroscopic motions in these nebulae (including the tendency to expand) and the high electrical conductivity of matter. The expansion of nebulae is to be generally accompanied by the considerable decrease in brightness (roughly about d–5), but if the expansion is only in one direction, owing to the presence of a regular magnetic field, the brightness decreases much more slowly (roughly about d–2) and the nebulae remain visible for a longer time. The filamentary structure, which is very often inherent to the elongated nebulae, is, probably, an additional factor of a longer visibility of the nebulae under consideration. The great lengthening of nebulae may be reached in the period of the order of 106 years.

In the dark nebulae the matter seems to be electrically conductive and the macroscopic motions of the order of 1–2 km/sec are present there, so that there are reasons to suggest that the magnetic field is also responsible for the elongated shape of many dark nebulae. One may prove that the observed elongated shape of dark and emission nebulae could not be caused by differential galactic rotation.

Type
Part III: Stellar Magnetism
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958 

References

1. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, no. 2. 110, 1955.Google Scholar
2. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, no. 5, 838, 1955.Google Scholar
3. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, no. 6, 489, 1955.Google Scholar
4. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 33, no. 2, 210, 1956.Google Scholar
5. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 33, no. 3, 1956.Google Scholar
6. Shajn, G. A. A.J. U.S.S.R. 33, no. 4, 1956.Google Scholar
7. Shajn, G. A. and Hase, V. C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 82, 857, 1952.Google Scholar
8. Shajn, G. A. and Hase, V. Publ. Crim. Astroph. Obs. 8, 80, 1952.Google Scholar
9. Spitzer, L. Harv. Obs. Monogr. 7, 87, 1948.Google Scholar
10. Kahn, F. B.A.N. 12, no. 456, 1954.Google Scholar
11. Oort, J. H. B.A.N. 12, no. 455, 1954.Google Scholar
12. Hiltner, W. A. Astrophys. J. 109, 478, 1949; 114, 241, 1951; 120, 454, 1954.Google Scholar
13. Hall, J. S. and Mikesell, A. H. Publ. U.S. Nav. Obs. 17, pt. 1, 1950; Les particules solides dans les astres (1955), p. 543.Google Scholar
14. Smith, E. V. P. Sky and Telescope , 14, 8, 324, 1955.Google Scholar
15. Shajn, G. A., Pikelner, S. and Ikhsanov, R. A.J. U.S.S.R. 32, no. 5, 395, 1955.Google Scholar
16. Shajn, G. A. and Hase, V. C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. , 96, 713, 1954.Google Scholar
17. Mustel, E. A.J. U.S.S.R. 33, no. 2, 182, 1956.Google Scholar