Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T19:19:48.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WITH FORKED TONGUES: WHAT ARE NATIONAL LANGUAGES GOOD FOR?Florian Coulmas (Ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 1988. Pp. ix + 185.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Braj B. Kachru
Braj B. Kachru
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 348 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fishman, J. A. (1988). “English only”: Its ghosts, myths, and dangers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 74, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1977a). Language and politics in the United States. In Saville-Troike, M. (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table. (pp. 267–296). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1977b). A national language academy? Debate in the nation. Linguistics, 189, 9–43.Google Scholar