Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-fppsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T10:36:18.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY SIZES OF L2 LEARNERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2008

Stuart Webb
Stuart Webb
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary size. The experimental design expanded upon earlier methodologies by using equivalent receptive and productive test formats with different receptive and productive target words to provide more accurate results. Translation tests were scored at two levels of sensitivity to measure receptive and productive knowledge of meaning and form. The results showed that total receptive vocabulary size was larger than productive vocabulary. When responses were scored for fuller knowledge, receptive vocabulary size was also found to be greater than productive vocabulary size in each of three word frequency bands, with the difference between receptive and productive knowledge increasing as the frequency of the words decreased. However, when responses were scored for partial knowledge, there was little difference among vocabulary sizes at each frequency band. The findings also indicated that receptive vocabulary size might give some indication of productive vocabulary size. Learners who have a larger receptive vocabulary are likely to know more of those words productively than learners who have a smaller receptive vocabulary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 79 - 95
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & McCaslin, E.S. (1983). Vocabulary: All contexts are not created equal. Elementary School Journal, 83, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 83–96). London: Longman.
Crow, J.T. (1986). Receptive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 70, 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, M. (2000). How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners. RELC Journal, 31, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, G.F. & Harley, T.A. (1996). List learning of second language vocabulary. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, G.F. (1992). Aspects of the psychology of second language vocabulary list learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, England.
Hirsh, D. & Nation, I.S.P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.Google Scholar
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.R., Stein, M.L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, I.S.P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Paribakht, T. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48, 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. & Jones, G. (1990). Eurocentres Vocabulary Size Test: 10KA. Zurich: Eurocentres.
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive versus productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mondria, J. & Wiersma, B. (2004). Receptive, productive, and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Morgan, B.Q. & Oberdeck, L.M. (1930). Active and passive vocabulary. In E. W. Bagster-Collins (Ed.), Studies in modern language teaching (pp. 213–221). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Morton, J. (1979). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. Marshall (Eds.), Structures and processes 2 (pp. 106–156). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Nagy, W.E., Anderson, R.C., & Herman, P.A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W.E. & Herman, P.A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nagy, W.E., Herman, P., & Anderson, R.C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I.S.P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, G. (1929). An experiment in verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkham, T. (1989). Rote learning, attitudes, and abilities: A comparison of Japanese and American students. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R. (1997a). A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata (Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama), 1, 53–68.Google Scholar
Waring, R. (1997b). A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards. Studies in Foreign Languages and Literature (Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama), 21, 94–114.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, G. & Nation, I.S.P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 215–229.Google Scholar