Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T13:49:47.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instructional Strategies and SLA in Early French Immersion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Birgit Harley
Birgit Harley
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examining the role of instruction in second language acquisition (SLA) entails not only a specification of what aspects of SLA stand to be affected but also a clear conception of what is meant by instruction. In this paper the potential of various instructional strategies for promoting SLA among child second language (L2) learners is considered in relation to empirical findings in early French immersion programs. Several principles are proposed concerning the what, when, and how of code-focused L2 instruction in a communicatively oriented school-based acquisition context. These proposals need to be put to the test in further experimental research.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 245 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 57–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 56, 3–17.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (1990). Aspects of an educational learning theory. Review of Educational Research, 60, 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). Teachers' priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. Working Papers on Bilingualism (Vol. 12, pp. 21–33). Toronto: Modern Language Centre, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Day, E. M., & Shapson, S. M. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 4, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, A. (1990). Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Early, M. (1989). Using key visuals to aid ESL students' comprehension. Reading-Canada-Lecture, 7, 202–212.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1988). The role of practice in classroom learning. AILA Review, 5, 20–39.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1992). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Handscombe, J. (1990). The complementary roles of researchers and practitioners in second language education. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 181–186). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1989a). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1989b). Second language proficiency and classroom treatment in early French immersion. In Freudenstein, R. (Ed.), Error in foreign languages: Analysis and treatment (pp. 19–27). Marburg: Informationszentrum für Fremdsprachenforschung der Philipps-Universität.Google Scholar
Harley, B. (1989c). Transfer in the written compositions of French immersion students. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Transfer in language production (pp. 3–19). New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harley, B. (1992). Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies, 2, 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1990). The development of second language proficiency. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B., & King, M. L. (1989). Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1979). Word watching: Learning vocabulary becomes a hobby. Foreign Language Annals, 12, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Swain, M. (1991). Early and middle French immersion programs: French language outcomes. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48, 11–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepicq, D. (1980). Aspects théoriques et empiriques de l'acceptabilitçais des élèves des classes d'immersion au Canada. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217–245). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1991). What have we here? Some observations on the influence of instruction on L2 learning. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Smith, M. Sharwood, & Swain, M. (Eds.), Foreign language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 197–212). Clevedon, UK: Multillingual matters.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1992). Getting quality input in the second/foreign language classroom. In Kramsch, C. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspertives on language study (pp. 187–197). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language Instruction make a difference? TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991a). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Bot, K. deGinsberg, R. B., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991b, July). Focus on form and focus on forms in classroom SLA. Paper presented at the Research Colloquium on the Role of Instruction in Second Language Acquisition, Concordia University. Montreal.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1993). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of sociolinguistic competence: A study in French immersion classrooms at the grade eight level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. V. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1991). Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research, 7, 89–102.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 1, 159–169.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118–132.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., Swain, M. (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 93–109). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching (edited by Allen, P. & Harley, B.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Carroll, S. (1987). The immersion observation study. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.), The development of bilingual proficiency final report (Vol. 2, pp. 190–263). Toronto: Modern Language Centre, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: A Canadian case study. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1986). Immersion French at the secondary level: ‘The goods’ and ‘the bads.’ Contact, 5, 2–9.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1989). Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and late French immersion students. In Scarcella, R., Anderson, E., & Krashen, S. D. (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp. 41–54). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B. (in press). French immersion graduates at university and beyond: What difference has it made? In Alatis, J. M. (Ed.), The Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Weslander, D., & Stephany, G. V. (1983). Evaluation of an English as a second language program for Southeast Asian students. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, G. M. (1987). Communication strategies and their significance in foreign language teaching. System, 15, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar