Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:24:29.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discipline and Domestic Violence in Edinburgh, 1560–1625

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Melissa Hollander
Melissa Hollander*
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As no Citie, Towne, howse, or familie can maynteine their estate and prospere without policie and governaunce, so the Churche of God, which more purely to be governed than any citie or familie, can not without spirituali Policie and ecclesiasticall Discipline continewe, encrease and florishe. [sic]

The form of prayers and ministration of the sacraments, &c, used in the English congregation at Geneva, 1556.

In June 1620 George Johnsoun was ‘scharplie rebukit for his hynous sin of disobediens to his parents in stryking of his mother’ and imprisoned for one week whilst the Session of St Cuthbert’s parish, Edinburgh, decided how to deal with him. The following week the Session ordained ‘george Johnsoun to ga to his parents everie mornyng and evening upoun his kneis and promeis with his grace never to do ye lyk in tymes cumyng’. The Session elders seem to have been aware both of the menace that George represented to his parents, his mother in particular, and of the extent to which he had become a disorderly troublemaker. They therefore required him to ‘[promise] to tak ane office man [with] him quher he so gets yair blissin’. The Session could thus monitor George’s behaviour and the fervency of his repentance, and guarantee that discipline was properly enacted. With this punishment the Kirk sent a clear message to the parishioners of St Cuthbert’s, and the whole Edinburgh Presbytery, that disobedience and disorder in the domestic sphere were entirely unacceptable. Perhaps more significantly, in this case the parish authorities publicly and explicitly declared and demonstrated that violence against domestic authority, particularly against one’s mother, was insupportable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 43: Discipline and Diversity , 2007 , pp. 307 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Laing, David, ed., The Works of John Knox, 6 vols (Edinburgh, 1855) [hereafter Knox, Works], 4: 203.Google Scholar

2 Edinburgh, National Archives of Scotland [hereafter: Edinburgh, NAS], CH2/718/4, f. 50. The minute books of the St Cutherbert session comprise four volumes.

3 Knox, , Works, 2: 104.Google Scholar

4 Kirk, James, ed., The Second Book of Discipline (Edinburgh, 1980), 159–244.Google Scholar

5 Graham, Michael, ‘Social Discipline in Scotland, 1560 to 1610’, in Mentzer, Raymond, ed., Sin and the Calviniste: Morals, Control and the Consistory in the Reformed Tradition (Kirksville, MO, 1994), 129–58, at 137.Google Scholar

6 Knox, John, The History of the Reformation in Scotland, ed. Lennox, Cuthbert (London, 1905) [hereafter: Knox, History], 396 Google Scholar. Kirk, , Second Book of Discipline and Cameron, James K., ed., The First Book of Discipline (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

7 Bound, Fay, ‘An “Uncivil” Culture: Marital Violence and Domestic Politics in York, c.1660-c.1760’, in Hallett, Mark and Rendali, Jane, eds, Eighteenth-Century York: Culture Space and Society, Borthwick Texts and Calendars 30 (York, 2003), 50–8 Google Scholar. This perspective on the material is not always accepted as unproblematic: Amussen, Susan Dwyer, ‘ “Being Stirred to Much Unquietness”: Violence and Domestic Violence in Early Modern England’, Journal of Women’s History 6: 2 (1994), 70–89, at 71–2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Sharpe, J. A., ‘Domestic Homicide in Early Modern England’, The Historical Journal 24: 1 (1981), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Schilling, Heinz, ‘Reform and Supervision of Family Life in Germany and the Nether lands’, in Mentzer, , Sin and the Calvinists, 15–63 Google Scholar, is a good survey of the family in the policies of reformed consistories.

9 journal Todd, Margo, The Culture of Protestantism in Early Modem Scotland (Yale, 2004), 183–5 Google Scholar. Graham, , ‘Social Discipline’, 137–8 Google Scholar. This is in line with reformed thought in England, see, Amussen, , ‘ “Being Stirred to Much Unquietness”’, 75 Google Scholar. Scots Calvinism also gave the Scots ‘a sense of their own distinctive place in the world’, as leaders of the reformation, Allen, David ‘Protestantism, Presbyterianism and National Identity in Eighteenth-Century Scottish History’, in Claydon, T. and McBride, I., eds, Protestantism and National Identity: Britain and Ireland, c.1650 to 1850 (Cambridge, 1998), 182–205, at 185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Kirk, , Second Book of Discipline, 241.Google Scholar

10 Edinburgh, NAS, CH2/718/1-4, 2: 146, 2:328, 3:60, 4:165, 4: 170.

11 Robertson, D., ed., South Leith Records: Compiled from the Parish Registers for the Years 1588 to 1700; and from Other Original Sources (Edinburgh, 1911), 3, 9, 10, and 11.Google Scholar

12 Knox, , Works, 3: 539.Google Scholar

13 Bound, , ‘An “Uncivil” Culture’, 52 Google Scholar. Foyster, Elizabeth, ‘Male Honour, Social Control and Wife Beating in Late Stuart England’, TRHS ser. 6, 6(1996), 215–24, at 216–17.Google Scholar

14 Sharpe, , ‘Domestic Homicide in Early Modern England’, 31.Google Scholar

15 Knox, , Works, 6: 468–9.Google Scholar

16 Cameron, , First Book of Discipline, 168.Google Scholar

17 Edinburgh, NAS, CH2/718/52, 165.

18 Edinburgh, NAS, CH2/718/2, 146.

19 Knox, , Works, 3: 536.Google Scholar

20 Amussen, , ‘ “Being Stirred to Much Unquietness”’, 70–1.Google Scholar

21 Knox, , Works, 3: 540–1.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., 3: 535–9. Todd, Culture of Protestantism, ch. 6. Amussen, , ‘ “Being Stirred to Much Unquietness”’, 73.Google Scholar

23 Knox, , Works, 3: 535–7 Google Scholar. Todd, , Culture of Protestantism, 299 Google Scholar. Bound, , ‘An “Uncivil” Culture’, 53.Google Scholar

24 Knox, , Works, 3:536.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., 3: 540–1.

26 Cameron, , First Book of Discipline, 167–8 Google Scholar. Todd, , Culture of Protestantism, 243.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., 168.

28 Ibid., 62–7 and 165–7. Knox, , Works, 3: 107–19.Google Scholar

29 Harrison, John G., ‘Women and the Branks in Stirling, c.1600 to c.1730’, Scottish Economic and Social History 18: 2 (1998), 114–31, at 116–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Cameron, , First Book of Discipline, 168 Google Scholar. Harrison, , “Women and the Branks in Stirling’, 127–8.Google Scholar

31 Knox, , History, 404.Google Scholar

32 Cameron, , First Book of Discipline, 168.Google Scholar

33 Knox, , Works, 6:468–9 Google Scholar: The order of excommunication and public repentance, 1569’.

34 Brown, Yvonne Galloway and Ferguson, Rona, eds, Twisted Sisters: Women, Crime and Deviance in Scotland Since 1400 (East Linton, 2002)Google Scholar, esp. chapters 9 and 10. Symonds, Deborah A., Weep Not for Me: Women, Ballads, and Infanticide in Early Modern Scotland (University Park, PA, 1997)Google Scholar. Jackson, Mark, ed., Infanticide: Historical Perspectives on Child Murder and Concealment, 1550–2000 (Aldershot, 2002)Google Scholar. Dolan, Frances, Dangerous Familiars: Representations of Domestic Crime in England 1550–1700 (Ithica, NY, 1994)Google Scholar. Amussen, , ‘ “Being Stirred to Much Unquietness”’, 75.Google Scholar

35 Edinburgh, NAS, CH2/718/3, 60.

36 Foyster, , ‘Male Honour, Social Control and Wife Beating’, 216.Google Scholar

37 In cases of violence initiated by women in other presbyteries, parading and proces sions of a similar kind to those imposed on George Johnsoune were used, see Todd, , Culture of Protestantism, 153.Google Scholar

38 Calderwood, Alma B., ed., Buik of the Kirk of the Canagait 1564–1567 (Edinburgh, 1961), 78.Google Scholar