Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T00:47:27.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degree of Proximity in the Construction of Social Representations: The Case of Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Isabel Miguel ,
Joaquim Pires Valentim  and
Felice Carugati
Isabel Miguel*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal)
Joaquim Pires Valentim
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal)
Felice Carugati
Affiliation:
Universitá di Bologna (Italy)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Isabel Miguel. Instituto de Psicologia Cognitiva, Desenvolvimento Vocacional e Social. Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article is devoted to the empirical endeavor of studying the effect of the degree of proximity, defined by specific socio-educational insertions, on the organization of social representations of intelligence. A questionnaire was answered by a sample of 752 participants belonging to five different social categories with different degrees of proximity and knowledge about intelligence: mothers, fathers, mother-teachers and non-parent students (psychology and science students). The questionnaire included different topics, namely concerning the concept of intelligence, its development and the effectiveness of teaching procedures. Results show that the principles organizing the contents of representations are linked to the personal involvement in intelligence, on which subjects more or less implied take different positions. Results produced suggest, therefore, that the content of representations is directly linked to the activation of social roles and the salience of the object, reflecting the functional character that the organization of representations has to specific social dynamics.

El presente artículo está dedicado a la tarea empírica de estudiar el efecto del grado de proximidad, definido por las inserciones socio-educativas específicas, en la organización de las representaciones sociales de la inteligencia. Un cuestionario fue respondido por una muestra de 752 participantes pertenecientes a cinco categorías sociales diferentes, con diferentes grados de proximidad y conocimiento sobre inteligencia: madres, padres, madre-profesoras y estudiantes sin hijos (estudiantes de psicología y de ciencias). En el cuestionario se incluyeron temas diferentes, principalmente en lo que respecta al concepto de inteligencia, su desarrollo y la eficacia de los procedimientos de enseñanza. Los resultados muestran que los principios que organizan los contenidos de las representaciones están vinculados a la participación personal en relación con la inteligencia, en la cual individuos más o menos relacionados adquieren diferentes roles. Por lo tanto, los resultados obtenidos sugieren que el contenido de las representaciones está directamente conectado con la activación de los roles sociales y la relevancia del objeto, reflejando el carácter funcional que la organización de las representaciones tiene para las dinámicas sociales específicas.

Keywords

social representationsintelligencedegree of proximityrepresentaciones socialesinteligenciagrado de proximidad
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 1244 - 1258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abric, J.-C. (1997a). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques [Social representations: Theoretical aspects]. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] (2nd Ed., pp. 11–36). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (1997b). Pratiques sociales, représentations sociales [Social practices, social representations]. In Abric, J.-C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] (2nd Ed., pp. 217–238). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (2001a). L'approche structurale des représentations sociales: Développements récents [The structural approach of social representations: Recent developments]. Psychologie et Société, 4, 81–104.Google Scholar
Abric, J.-C. (2001b). A structural approach to social representations. In Deaux, K. & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 42–47). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Amaral, V. (1997). A inteligência e o seu desenvolvimento: Representações sociais e identidades sociais [Intelligence and its development: Social representations and social identities]. In Monteiro, M. B. & Castro, P. (Eds.), Cada cabeça sua sentença: Ideias dos adultos sobre as crianças [So many heads, so many minds: Adults' ideas about children] (pp. 33–74). Oeiras, Portugal: Celta.Google Scholar
Amaral, V., Carugati, F., Peixoto, F., & Selleri, P. (2006, November). Representações sociais como princípios organizadores de conteúdos cognitivos: Um estudo sobre as representações sociais da inteligência [Social representations as organizing principles of cognitive contents: A study on social representations of intelligence]. Actas do VI Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia (pp. 100–109). Évora, Portugal: Universidade de Évora.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (2nd Ed.). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Breakwell, G. M. (1993). Social representations and social identity. Papers on Social Representations, 2(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
Carugati, F. (1990a). Everyday ideas, theoretical models and social representations: The case of intelligence and its development. In Semin, G. R. & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.), Everyday understanding: Social and scientific implications (pp. 130–150). London, England: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Carugati, F. (1990b). From social cognition to social representations in the study of intelligence. In Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 126–143). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carugati, F., Emiliani, F., & Molinari, L. (1989). Being a mother is not enough: Theories and images in social representations of childhood. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 3, 289–306.Google Scholar
Carugati, F., & Selleri, P. (2004). Intelligence, educational practices and school reform: Organisations change, representations persist. European Journal of School Psychology, 2, 149–167.Google Scholar
Carugati, F., Selleri, P., & Scappini, E. (1994). Are social representations an architecture of cognitions? A tentative model for extending the dialog. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 134–151.Google Scholar
Castro, P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Contributions from the social representations approach. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 247–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clémence, A. (2001). Social positioning and social representations. In Deaux, K. & Philogène, G. (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 83–95). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Constans, S., & Leonardis, M. (2003). Co-construction of the representations of intelligence between mother and daughter: Developmental and differential approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 369–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dany, L., & Abric, J.-C. (2007). Distance à l'objet et représentations du cannabis [Distance to the object and representations of cannabis]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20, 77–104.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1982). L'explication en psychologie sociale [Explanation in social psychology]. Paris, France: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1985). Les représentations sociales: Définition d'un concept [Social representations: Definition of a concept]. Connexions, 45, 243–253.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1990). Les représentations sociales [Social representations]. In Ghiglione, R., Bonnet, C. & Richard, J.-F. (Eds.), Traité de psychologie cognitive: Cognition, représentation, communication [Treaty of cognitive psychology: Cognition, representation, communication] (pp. 111–174). Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1992). L'ancrage dans les études sur les représentations sociales [Anchoring in studies of social representations]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doise, W. (1993). Debating social representations. In Breakwell, G. M. & Canter, D. V. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 157–170). Oxford, England: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doise, W. (2011). The homecoming of society in social psychology. In Valentim, J. P. (Ed.), Societal approaches in social psychology (pp. 9–34). Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1992). Représentations sociales et analyses de données [Social representations and data analysis]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort North, PH: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Emiliani, F., & Molinari, L. (1994). From the child to one's own child: Social dynamics and identities at work. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 303–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, L., & Fontaine, A. M. (1993). Representações dos professores sobre a natureza e desenvolvimento da inteligência [Teachers' representations on the nature and development of intelligence]. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 3, 471–487.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Flament, C. (1999). Liberté d'opinion et limite normative dans une représentation sociale: Le développement de l'intelligence [Freedom of opinion and normative limits in a social representation: The development of intelligence]. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 201–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.58.3.201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruev-Vintila, A., & Rouquette, M. L. (2007). Social thinking about collective risk: How do risk-related practice and personal involvement impact its social representations? Journal of Risk Research, 10, 555–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870701338064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurrieri, C., Wolter, R. P., & Sorribas, E. (2007). L'implication personnelle: Un outil psychosocial pour comprendre le lien population-objet [Personal implication: A psychosocial tool for understanding the population-object link]. Psicologia em Estudo, 12, 423–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722007000200024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, C. (2006a). How social representations of attitudes have informed attitude theories: The consensual and the reified. Theory and Psychology, 16, 691–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354306067443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, C. (2006b). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 65–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466605X43777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodelet, D. (1989). Folies et représentations sociales [Madness and social representations]. Paris, France: PUF. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1522/030110944Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. Hove, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation on common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 431–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00378.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Représentations sociales, pratique de consommation et niveau de connaissance: Le cas du vin [Social representations, consumption practices and knowledge levels: The case of wine]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 78, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteucci, M. C. (2007). Teachers facing the school failure: The social valorization of effort in the school context. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 29–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-006-9011-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., & Sigel, I. E. (1995). Parental beliefs. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Status and social conditions of parenting (Vol. 3, pp. 333–358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., & Carugati, F. (2008). Representações sociais da inteligência e práticas educativas: Apresentação de uma investigação em curso [Social representations of intelligence and educational practices: An ongoing investigation]. In Caetano, A., Garrido, M., Batel, S., & Martins, A. M. (Eds.), Percursos da investigação em psicologia social e organizacional [Paths of research on social and organizational psychology] (Vol. III, pp. 301–318). Lisboa, Portugal: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., & Carugati, F. (2009). Parental ideas and their role in childrearing: The idea-behavior connection. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 3, 225–253.Google Scholar
Miguel, I., Valentim, J. P., & Carugati, F. (2010). Intelligence and its development: Social representations and social identities. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 21–33.Google Scholar
Molinari, L., & Speltini, G. (1998). Breast feeding, practices and values: A study of social representations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 235–247.Google Scholar
Moliner, P., & Gutermann, M. (2004). Dynamique des descriptions et des explications dans une représentation sociale [Description and explanation dynamics in social representations]. Papers on Social Representations, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Moloney, G. (2010). Acknowledging Gerard. Articulating social representations and identity through process and content: The resettlement of refugees in regional Australia. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 11–16.Google Scholar
Moloney, G., & Walker, I. (2007). Social representations and identity: Content, process and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son publique [Psychoanalysis: Its images and its public]. Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181–209). London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1984). De la science au sense commun. In Moscovici, S. (Ed.), Psychologie sociale [Social psychology] (pp. 539–566). Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Marková, I. (2000). Ideas and their development: A dialogue between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Marková. In Duveen, G. (Ed.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (pp. 224–286). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1985). L'Intelligence au pluriel: Les représentations sociales de l'intelligence et de son développement [Social representations of intelligence]. Cousset, Switzerland: Editions DelVal.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (2009). Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pleck, J. H., & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2004). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources and consequences. In Lamb, M. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (4th Ed., pp. 222–273). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Poeschl, G. (1998). Processus d'ancrage et représentations sociales de l'intelligence [Anchoring process and social representations of intelligence]. Psicologia, 12, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeschl, G. (1999). Intelligence masculine et intelligence féminine [Male intelligence and female intelligence]. In Bril, B., Dasen, P., Sabatier, C., & Krewer, B. (Eds.), Propos sur l'enfant et l'adolescent: Quels enfants por quelles cultures? [About children and adolescents: What children for what cultures?] (pp. 297–315). Paris, France: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Poeschl, G. (2000). Trabalho doméstico e poder familiar: Práticas, normas e ideais [Housework and family power: Practices, standards and ideals]. Análise Social, 15, 695–719.Google Scholar
Poeschl, G. (2001). Social comparison and differentiation strategies in social representations of intelligence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.60.1.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1995). On the social fabric of intelligence. Papers on Social Representations, 4, 177–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03172921Google Scholar
Räty, H., Snellman, L., & Vornanen, A. (1993). Public views on intelligence: A Finnish study. Psychological Reports, 72, 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.1.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salesses, L. (2005a). Effet d'attitude dans le processus de structuration d'une représentation sociale [Effect of attitude in the structuring of a social representation]. Psychologie Française, 50, 471–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2005.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salesses, L. (2005b). Rôle du niveau de connaissance dans le processus de structuration d'une représentation sociale [Role of the knowledge level in the structuring of a social representation]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 66, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In Sigel, I. E. (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Silva, A., & Poeschl, G. (2001/2002). Representações das semelhanças e das diferenças entre os sexos [Representations of the similarities and differences between genders]. Cadernos de Consulta Psicológica, 17/18, 153–159.Google Scholar
Spini, D., & Doise, W. (1998). Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<603::AID-EJSP884>3.0.CO;2-P3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.5.325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C., & Cabrera, N. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of father involvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Whetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self- categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Valentim, J. P. (1997). Escola, igualdade e diferença [School, equality and difference]. Porto, Portugal: Campo das Letras.Google Scholar
Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: A british debate. Culture and Psychology, 11, 431–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05058586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W., Valencia, J., & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the “hot” stable core of social representations: A structural analysis of word association. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 331–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01101.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar