Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:58:19.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research in Psychopharmacology by Psychology Departments (1987–2007)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Enrique F. Portillo-Salido
Enrique F. Portillo-Salido*
Affiliation:
ESTEVE, Departamento de Farmacología (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Enrique F. Portillo-Salido. ESTEVE, Departamento de Farmacología. Avda. Virgen de Montserrat, 221. 0841 Barcelona. (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From the very outset of scientific Psychology, psychologists have shown interest for drugs and their effects on behavior. This has given rise to numerous contributions, mostly in the form of Psychopharmacology publications. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate these contributions and compare them with other academic disciplines related to Psychopharmacology. Using the PubMed database, we retrieved information about articles from 15 journals included in the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category of the Journal Citation Reports database for a 21-year period (1987 to 2007). There were 37540 articles which about 52% were represented by 3 journals. About 70% of psychology publications were represented by 2 of these journals. Psychology departments accounted for the 11% of the published papers, which places Psychology third behind Psychiatry and Pharmacology, which contributed to 22.69 and 13% respectively. Psychology contributed to the greatest number of studies in 3 journals, second in 3 and third in 8. This report represents the first effort to explore the contribution of academic Psychology to the multidisciplinary science of psychopharmacology. Although leaders of production of psychopharmacology research were from Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Psychology departments are an important source of studies and thus of knowledge in the field of Psychopharmacology

Desde los mismos inicios de la Psicología científica los psicólogos han mostrado interés por los fármacos y el efecto de éstos sobre la conducta. Esto ha dado lugar a numerosas aportaciones, principalmente en forma de publicaciones de Psicofarmacología. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar cuantitativamente estas aportaciones y compararlas con las de otras disciplinas académicas relacionadas con la Psicofarmacología. Usando la base de datos PubMed se extrajo información sobre artículos publicados en 15 revistas incluidas en la categoría de Farmacología y Farmacia de la base de datos Journal Citation Reports durante un período de 21 años (1987-2007). Hubo 37.540 artículos de los cuales alrededor del 52% se publicaron en 3 revistas. El 70 % de las publicaciones de psicología se publicaron en 2 de estas revistas. Psicología, con el 11% de los artículos publicados, fue la tercera detrás de Psiquiatría y Farmacología, que contribuyeron con el 22,69 y el 13% respectivamente. Psicología contribuyó con el mayor número de estudios en 3 revistas, fue la segunda en 3 y la tercera en 8. Este estudio representa un primer intento por explorar la contribución de la Psicología académica a la ciencia multidisciplinar de la psicofarmacología. Aunque los líderes de producción en investigación psicofarmacológica fueron Psiquiatría y Farmacología, los departamentos de Psicología son una importante fuente de estudios y por tanto de conocimiento en el campo de la Psicofarmacología.

Keywords

psychologypsychiatrypharmacologypsychopharmacologyscientific journalsbibliometric studypsicologíapsiquiatríafarmacologíapsicofarmacologíarevistas científicasestudio bibliométrico
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 503 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J. E. (2002). The emergence of behavioral pharmacology. Molecular Interventions, 2, 470–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, L.T. Jr, Rogers, A. M., & Rosenbaum, A. (1991). Coca-Cola, caffeine, and mental deficiency: Harry Hollingworth and the Chattanooga trial of 1911. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 27, 42–55.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackman, D. E., & Pellón, R. (1993). The contributions of B. F. Skinner to the interdisciplinary science of behavioural pharmacology. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, D. E. (1991). Behavioral Pharmacology in Britain: A brief historical review. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzens, S. E. What do citations count? (1989). The rhetoric first model. Scientometrics, 15, 437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darrow, C. W. (1927). Some physiological conditions of efficiency. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMascio, A., Bernardo, D.L., Greenblatt, D. J., & Marder, J.E. (1976). A controlled trial of amantadine in drug-induced extrapyramidal disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 599–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMascio, A., & Buie, D. H. Jr. (1964). Psychopharmacology of chlorphentermine and d-amphetamine. A comparative study of their effects in normal males. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 5, 174–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMascio, A., Havens, L. L., & Klerman, G. L. (1963a). The psychopharmacology of phenothiazine compounds: a comparative study of the effects of chlorpromazine, promethazine, trifluoperazine and perphenazine in normal males. I. Introduction, aims and methods. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 136, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMascio, A., Havens, L. L., & Klerman, G. L. (1963b). The psychopharmacology of phenothiazine compounds: a comparative study of the effects of chlorpromazine, promethazine, trifluoperazine, and perphenazine in normal males. II. Results and discussion. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 136, 168–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMascio, A., Heninger, G., & Klerman, G. L. (1964). Psychopharmacology of imipramine and desipramine: a comparative study of their effects in normal males. Psychopharmacologia, 5, 361–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMascio, A., Klerman, G. L., & Prusoff, B. (1975). Relative safety of amitriptyline in maintenance treatment of depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 160, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMascio, A., Klerman, G. L., Rinkel, M., Greenblatt, M., & Brown, J. (1958). Psychophysiologic evaluation of phenyltoloxamine, a new phrenotropic agent; a comparative study with reserpine and placebo. American Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 301–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, N. B., & Ahrens, B. (1935). Studies of morphine, codeine, and their derivatives. VI. The measurement of the central effect of codeine, dihydrocodeine, and their isomers by the use of maze-trained rats. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. A. (2008). Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science, 321, 395–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernberger, S. W. (1932). Further observations on peyote intoxication. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 26, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, O. D. (1940). Neurophysiological and psychological changes induced by certain drugs: I. Responses to electrical stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 27, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, O. D. (1941). Neurophysiological and psychological changes induced by certain drugs: II. Electrocortical changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. C., Klerman, G. L., & Cole, J. O. (1965). Changes in schizophrenic psychopathology and ward behaviour as a function of phenothiazine treatment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 120–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. C., Mattsson, N., Cole, J.O., & Klerman, G.L. (1967). Prediction of improvement in schizophrenia under four phenothiazines. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 107–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. C., Schooler, N. R., Davidson, E. M., & Kayce, M. M. (1966). Sex and race differences in response to drug treatment among schizophrenics. Psychopharmacologia, 9, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. C., Schooler, N. R., Hogarty, G. E., & Roper, M. (1977). Prediction of relapse in schizophrenic outpatients treated by drug and sociotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 171–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, D. (1998). Pioneers in Psychopharmacology. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 1, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, D. (2000). Pioneers in Psychopharmacology II. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 3, 351–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, D. (2001). The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heron, W. T., & Skinner, B. F. (1937). The effects of certain drugs and hormones on conditioning and extinction. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 741–742.Google Scholar
Hogarty, G. E., & Goldberg, S. C. (1973). Drug and sociotherapy in the aftercare of schizophrenic patients. One-year relapse rates. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingrowth, H. L (1912a). Psychological aspects of drug action. Psychological Bulletin. 9, 420–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingworth, H. L. (1912b). The influence of caffein alkaloid on the quality and amount of sleep. American Journal of Psychology, 23, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingworth, H. L.& Poffenberger, A. T. (1920) Applied Psychology. New York, NY, US: D Appleton & Company.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. (1942). Experiments on the physiological mechanism of noise-induced seizures in the albino rat. II. The site of action of the parasympathetic drugs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 33, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iñiguez-Rueda, L., Martínez-Martínez, L. M, Muñoz-Justicia, J. M., Peñaranda-Cólera, M. C., Sahagún-Padilla, M. A., & Alvarado, J. G. (2008). The mapping of Spanish social psychology through its conferences: a bibliometric perspective. Spanish Journal Psychology, 11, 137–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact. PLoS ONE. 3, e2778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karn, H. W., Lodowski, C. H., & Patton, R. A. (1941). The effect of metrazol on the susceptibility of rats to sound-induced seizures. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 32, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klerman, G. L., DiMascio, A., Havens, L.L., & Snell, J. E. (1960). Sedation and tranquilization. A comparison of the effects of a number of psychopharmacologic agents upon normal human subjects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 3, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondilis, B. K., Kiriaze, I. J., Athanasoulia, A. P., & Falagas, M. E. (2008). Mapping health literacy research in the European Union: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE. 3, e2519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laties, V. (2003). Behavior Analysis and the Growth of Behavioral Pharmacology. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoie, K. L., & Barone, S. (2006). Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies. CNS Drugs, 20, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewison, G., & Devey, M. E. (1999). Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research. Rheumatology, 38, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-Muñoz, F., Alamo, C., Cuenca, E., Shen, W. W., Clervoy, P., & Rubio, G. (2005). History of the discovery and clinical introduction of chlorpromazine. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 17, 113–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, K, Rahman, M., & Fukui, T. (2003). Japan's contribution to clinical research in gastroenterology and hepatology. Journal of Gastroenterology, 38, 816–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGinnies, E. (1947). The effects of pregnenolone on the learning of normal and of stressed albino rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 40, 389–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, M. F. (1922). The psychological effects of drugs. Psychological Bulletin. 19, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. F. (1923). Alcohol, tobacco and tea: the efficiency under drugs as derived from the learning equation. American Journal of Psychology, 34, 501–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & van Raan, A. J. F. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, U., Fletcher, P. C., & Steinberg, H. (2006). The origin of pharmacopsychology: Emil Kraepelin's experiments in Leipzig, Dorpat and Heidelberg (1882-1892). Psychopharmacology (Berl), 184, 131–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, G. M.; & Carter, G. W. (1936). The local application of drugs to the motor cortex of the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 22, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poffenberger, A. T. (1914). Psychological effects of drugs. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poffenberger, A. T. (1916) Psychological effects of drugs. Psychological Bulletin. 13, 434–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poffenberger, A. T. (1917) Psychological effects of drugs, Psychological Bulletin, 14, 409–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poffenberger, A. T. (1919). Drugs. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 291–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed.Google Scholar
Rahman, M., Haque, T. L., & Fukui, T. (2005). Research articles published in clinical radiology journals: trend of contribution from different countries. Academic Radiolology, 12, 825–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, C. P. (1931). Sleep produced by hypnotics studied by the electrical skin resistance method. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 42, 471–486.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, M. (2002). Chlorpromazine and the psychopharmacologic revolution. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 1860–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushton, R., & Steinberg, H. (1963). Mutual potentiation of amphetamine and amylobarbitone measured by activity in rats. British Journal of Pharmacology, 21, 295–305.Google ScholarPubMed
Schilling, W. (1921). The effect of caffein and acetanilid on simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 28, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmied, L.A., Steinberg, H., & Sykes, E. A. (2006). Psychopharmacology's debt to experimental psychology. History of Psychology, 9, 144–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, L. V., & Brown, C. W. (1938). The effect of subcutaneous injections of benzedrine sulphate on the activity of white rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 480–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seglen, P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settlege, P. (1936). The effect of sodium amytal on the formation and elicitation of conditioned reflexes. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 22, 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shock, N. W. (1939). Some psychophysiological relations. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 447–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, A. K., & Eddy, N. B. (1935). Studies of morphine, codeine, and their derivatives. V. The use of maze-trained rats to study the effect on the central nervous system of morphine and related substances. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F., & Heron, W. T. (1937). Effects of caffeine and benzedrine upon conditioning and extinction. The Psychological Record, 1, 340–346.Google Scholar
Soteriades, E. S., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States. British Medical Journal, 331, 192–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soteriades, E. S., Rosmarakis, E. S., Paraschakis, K., & Falagas, M. E. (2006). Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995-2002). The FASEB Journal. 20, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spragg, S. D. S. (1941). The effects of certain drugs on mental and motor efficiency. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, H. (1954). Selective effects of an anaesthetic drug on cognitive behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, H. (1955). Changes in time perception induced by an anaesthetic drug. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, H. (1956). “Abnormal behaviour” induced by nitrous oxide. British Journal of Psychology, 47, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, H., Legge, D., & Summerfield, A. (1961). Drug-induced changes in visual perception. Neuro-Psychopharmacology, 2, 392–396.Google Scholar
Stellar, E. (1943). The effect of epinephrine, insulin, and glucose upon hoarding in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 36, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tainter, M. L. (1943). Effects of certain analeptic drugs on spontaneous running activity of the white rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 36, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchioe, R. (1945). The effect of coramine on the facilitation of the audiogenic seizure. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 38, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentink, E. A. (1938). The effects of certain drugs and hormones upon conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G., & O'Brien, C. (1937). The effect of sodium phenobarbital on the learning behavior of white rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar