Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:30:56.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Counting Blessings on Subjective Well-Being: A Gratitude Intervention in a Spanish Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

María Luisa Martínez-Martí*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
María Dolores Avia
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
María José Hernández-Lloreda
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to María Luisa Martínez-Martí. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Campus de Somosaguas, Pozuelo, 28223 Madrid. (Spain ). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study examined a gratitude intervention repeating Emmons and McCullough study (2003) in a Spanish sample. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (gratitude, hassles and any event) and kept daily records during 2 weeks of gratitude, affect, quality of relationships, physical and subjective well-being. We added design features to assess the intervention long-term impact (follow-up measures), and to improve the design control (pre-treatment measures). Following the cited authors' analysis, i.e., comparing groups only in the post-test, we replicated their results, finding differences in positive affect and gratitude between the gratitude condition and the hassles condition. However, when including both the pre and the follow-up measures in the analysis, results were replicated only partially, as the difference in gratitude disappeared. Moreover, the difference in positive affect between groups in the post-test seemed to be influenced mainly by a decrease in positive affect in the hassles group. Post-test differences between groups in positive affect disappeared in the follow-up. Gratitude interventions may have an effect on well-being, but we consider other methods to promote gratitude besides gratitude journals should be tested.

Este estudio examina una intervención en gratitud repitiendo el estudio de Emmons y McCullough (2003) en una muestra española. Los participantes fueron asignados de manera aleatoria a una de tres posibles condiciones (gratitud, escollos y cualquier suceso) y evaluaron diariamente durante dos semanas la gratitud, el afecto, la calidad de las relaciones, el bienestar físico y el bienestar subjetivo. Añadimos nuevos aspectos al diseño para evaluar el impacto de la intervención a largo plazo (medidas de seguimiento) y para mejorar el control (medidas pretest). Al hacer los mismos análisis que los autores previamente citados, es decir, al comparar los grupos sólo en el postest, replicamos sus resultados, ya que encontramos diferencias en afecto positivo y en gratitud entre el grupo de gratitud y el grupo de los escollos. Sin embargo, cuando incluimos las medidas pretest y las de seguimiento en el análisis, replicamos los resultados sólo de manera parcial, ya que la diferencia en gratitud desapareció. Además, la diferencia en afecto positivo entre los grupos en el postest parecía estar influida principalmente por un descenso en afecto positivo en el grupo de escollos. Las diferencias entre los grupos en afecto positivo en el postest desaparecieron en el seguimiento. Las intervenciones basadas en la gratitud pueden tener un efecto sobre el bienestar, pero consideramos que se deberían investigar otros métodos aparte de los diarios de gratitud.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425429.Google Scholar
Andrews, F. M., & Whitney, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. America's perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653655.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181185.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. E. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, R. A. (2004). Gratitude. In Peterson, C. and Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds.). Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classification. (pp. 553568). Washington D.C: APA & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,377389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The Broaden-and-Build Theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218226.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E.(Eds.) The Psychology of Gratitude. (pp. 145166). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1988). The Laws of Emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Ozimkowski, K. M., & Miller, N. (2009). Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive affect as a moderator. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 408422.Google Scholar
Froh, J. F., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 213233.Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004) (Eds.) Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classification. Washington D.C.: APA & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions. American Psychologist 60, 410421.Google Scholar
Watkins, P. C. (2004). Gratitude and subjective well-being. In Emmons, R. A. & McCullough, M. E. (Eds.), Psychology of Gratitude (pp. 167194). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, P. C., Grimm, D. L., & Kolts, R. (2004). Counting your blessings: Positive memories among grateful persons. Current Psychology, 23, 5267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T., & Kolts, R. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: development of a measure of gratitude and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 31(5), 431451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 854871.Google Scholar