Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T07:13:17.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supreme Court, 1888–1940: An Empirical Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Sandra L. Wood ,
Linda Camp Keith ,
Drew Noble Lanier  and
Ayo Ogundele
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies of decision making on the modern Supreme Court have drawn on readily available empirical data to explore the details of how the Court conducts its business (Segal and Spaeth 1993; Spaeth 1995). Sadly, however, such empirical studies have not been plentiful for periods of the Court’s history before the appointment of Chief Justice Earl Warren. Some discussion has occurred dating from the chief justiceship of William Howard Taft beginning in 1910, but these studies have limited scope (Bowen and Scheb 1993; Leavitt 1970; Pritchett 1948; Renstrom 1972; Slotnick 1979; Tate and Handberg 1991). The result is a plethora of studies concerning the modern Court and a dearth of systematic information on earlier Courts (Aliotta 1988; Brenner and Spaeth 1995; Epstein and Kobylka 1992; George and Epstein 1992; Handberg 1976; Schubert 1965, 1974; Segal 1984; Tate 1981; Ulmer 1970). The picture we do have concerning earlier Courts is largely drawn from biographical or doctrinal studies. While both of these enterprises are immensely useful, they lack the systematic quality of an empirical analysis that considers all cases (not just the important ones) and all justices (not just the intellectual or social leaders). We seek to create an empirical context out of which those outstanding justices and decisions arose. Our study allows confirmation of findings of previous studies of individuals and doctrine and provides a more complete picture of the Court during a tumultuous time in its history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Summer 1998 , pp. 201 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the University of North Texas research initiation grant program for support of this project and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Data and documentation will be provided by the first author on request three years from date of publication.

References

Aliotta, Jilda M. (1988) “Combining judges’ attributes and case characteristics: An alternative to explaining Supreme Court decisionmaking.” Judicature 71: 277–81.Google Scholar
Bartee, Alice Fleetwood (1992a) “William Rufus Day,” in Hall 1992: 220–21.Google Scholar
Aliotta, Jilda M.(1992b) “George Shiras, Jr.,” in Hall 1992: 783–84.Google Scholar
Bates, Ernest Sutherland (1963) The Story of the Supreme Court. New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1988) “Measuring policy change in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82: 905–12.Google Scholar
Biskupic, John, and Witt, Elder (1997) Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. 3d ed. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Blaustein, Albert P., and Mersky, Roy M. (1978) The First 100 Justices: Statistical Studies on the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press.Google Scholar
Boskey, Bennett, and Gressman, Eugene (1988) “The Supreme Court bids farewell to mandatory appeals.” Federal Rules of Decision 121: 81–99.Google Scholar
Bowen, Terry, and Scheb, John M. (1993) “Freshman opinion writing on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1921–1991.” Judicature 76: 239–43.Google Scholar
Brenner, Saul, and Spaeth, Harold J. (1995) Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Francis Joseph (1945) The Social and Economic Philosophy of Pierce Butler. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Currie, David P. (1990) The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Second Century, 1888–1986. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Danelski, David J. (1961) “The influence of the chief justice in the decisional process,” in Murphy, Walter F. and Pritchett, C. Herman (eds.) Courts, Judges and Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Danelski, David J., and Tulchin, Joseph S. (eds.) (1983) The Autobiographical Notes of Charles Evans Hughes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eitzen, D. Stanley (1964) David J. Brewer, 1837–1910: A Kansan on the United States Supreme Court. Emporia: Kansas State Teachers College.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph (1992) The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Walker, Thomas, Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold J. (1994) The Supreme Court Compendium. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Fairman, Charles (1971) Reconstruction and Reunion; 1864–88: Part One. Vol. 6 of Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise, History of the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. (1992) “David Josiah Brewer,” in Hall 1992: 89–91.Google Scholar
Freyer, Tony (1979) “Federal courts, localism and the national economy, 1865–1900.” Business History Review 53: 343–63.Google Scholar
Friedman, Richard D. (1996) “Telling the story of the Hughes Court.” University of Michigan Law School Law Quadrangle Notes 32–39.Google Scholar
George, Tracey E., and Epstein, Lee (1992) “On the nature of Supreme Court decision making.” American Political Science Review 86: 323–37.Google Scholar
Green, William Crawford (1992) “Willis Van Devanter,” in Hall 1992: 894–95.Google Scholar
Hagle, Timothy (1993) “‘Freshman effects’ for Supreme Court justices.” American Journal of Political Science 37:1142–57.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit, ed. (1992) The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger H. (1976) “Decision-making in a natural Court, 1916–1921.” American Politics Quarterly 4: 357–78.Google Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L. (1992) “Leadership and consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 54:1158–69.Google Scholar
Helminski, Francis (1992) “Henry Bills Brown,” in Hall 1992: 92–93.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul (1992) “Rufus Wheeler Peckham,” in Hall 1992: 626–27.Google Scholar
King, Willard L. (1950) Melville Weston Fuller: Chief Justice of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Latham, Frank B. (1970) The Great Dissenter: John Marshall Harlan, 1833–1911. New York: Cowles Book Company.Google Scholar
Leavitt, Donald C. (1970) “Attitudes and ideology on the White Supreme Court, 1910–1920.” Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Lurie, Jonathan (1992) “William Howard Taft,” in Hall 1992: 854–56.Google Scholar
Martin, Robert F. (1992) “Progressivism,” in Hall 1992: 882–83.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus T. (1956 [1946]) Brandeis: A Free Man’s Life. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus T. (1964) William Howard Taft: Chief Justice. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Historical Society (1904) “Memoir of Horace Gray.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 18:155–87.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1992) “Charles Evans Hughes,” in Hall 1992: 414–16.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. (1960) The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, Marian C. (1992) “Joseph McKenna,” in Hall 1992: 539–40.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Novick, Sheldon M. (1989) Honorable Justice: The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Orth, John V. (1992a) “Melville Weston Fuller,” in Hall 1992: 320–21.Google Scholar
Orth, John V.(1992b) “Horace Harmon Lurton,” in Hall 1992: 514–15.Google Scholar
Paul, Ellen Frankel (1992) “George Sutherland,” in Hall 1992: 848–49.Google Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman (1948) The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Renstrom, Peter G. (1972) “Psychological dimensions of decision making of the 1941–45 Stone Court.” Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Norman L. (1992) “Charles Henry Butler,” in Hall 1992:110–11.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M. (1992a) “Howell Edmunds Jackson,” in Hall 1992: 443.Google Scholar
Scheb, John M.(1992b) “James Clark McReynolds,” in Hall 1992: 542–43.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon A. (1965) The Judicial Mind: Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon A.(1974) The Judicial Mind Revisited: Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard (1993) A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1984) “Predicting Supreme Court cases probabilistically: The search and seizure cases, 1962–1981.” American Political Science Review 78: 891–900.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semonche (1978) Charting the Future: The Supreme Court Responds to a Changing Society, 1890–1920. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliott E. (1979) “Who speaks for the Court?: Majority opinion assignment from Taft to Burger.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 60–77.Google Scholar
Soifer, Aviam (1992) “John Hessian Clarke,” in Hall 1992:156–57.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J. (1995) Judicial Database: 1953–90 Terms. 6th release. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political Science Research.Google Scholar
Stenzell, Robert David (1992) “Mahlon Pitney,” in Hall 1992: 635–36.Google Scholar
Strum, Phillippa (1984) Louis D. Brandeis: Justice for the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Swindler, William (1969) Court and Constitution in the 20th Century: The Old Legality, 1889–1932. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal (1981) “Personal attribute models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in civil liberties and economic decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 75: 355–67.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Handberg, Roger (1991) “Time building and theory building in personal attribute models of Supreme Court voting behavior, 1916–88.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 460–80.Google Scholar
Ulmer, S. Sidney (1970) “The use of power in the Supreme Court: The opinions assignments of Earl Warren, 1953–60.” Journal of Public Law 19: 49–67.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin I. (1983) “Myth and reality: The Supreme Court and protective legislation in the Progressive Era.” Yearbook of the Supreme Court Historical Society 1983: 53–72.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin I. (1988) A March of Liberty: A Constitutional History of the United States. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin I.(1992) “Louis Dembitz Brandeis,” in Hall 1992: 83–85.Google Scholar
Van Devanter, Willis (1930) “The Supreme Court of the United States.” Indiana Law Journal 5: 553–62.Google Scholar
Vile, John R. (1992) “William Henry Moody,” in Hall 1992: 559–60.Google Scholar
Walker, Thomas G., Epstein, Lee, and Dixon, William J. (1988) “On the mysterious demise of consensual norms in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 50: 361–89.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles (1913) “The progressives on the United States Supreme Court.” Columbia Law Review 13: 294–313.Google Scholar
Winkle, John W III (1992) “Joseph Rucker Lamar,” in Hall 1992: 493–94.Google Scholar
Wood, Sandra L., Keith, Linda Camp, Lanier, Drew Noble, and Ogundele, Ayo (forthcoming) “Acclimation effects and Supreme Court Justices: A cross validation, 1888–1940.” American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Tinsley E. (1995) Judicial Enigma: The First Justice Harlan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar