Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:09:46.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociological Perspectives on Legal Change: The Role of the Legal Field in the Transformation of the Common Law of Industrial Accidents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Ryken Grattet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sociological and social historical approaches to the study of legal transformations have traditionally been marked by a focus on external “social” factors, such as industrialization, class conflict, and social movement activity, that causally determine the form and content of law (Hurst 1956; Friedman 1973; Gordon 1975; Hagan 1980; Humphries and Greenberg 1981; Chambliss and Seidman 1982; Chambliss and Zatz 1993; Kantor and Fishback 1994). More recently, interdisciplinary scholarship on law and society has criticized this view for narrowly reducing law to formal structure—organizational procedures and textual rules—and for its image of unidirectional causation running from society to law (Gordon 1984; Harrington and Yngvesson 1990). The result of this critique has been a growth in interpretive research on law emphasizing ideological analysis of law and depicting relations between law and society as constitutive (Milner 1989: 633).

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , Fall 1997 , pp. 359 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. (1989) American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adlow, Elijah (1962) The Genius of Lemuel Shaw: Expounder of the Common Law. Boston: Court Square Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Robert (1969) “Business and workers’ welfare in the Progressive Era: Workmen’s compensation reform in Massachusetts, 1880-1911.” Business History Review 43: 453-75.Google Scholar
Aumann, Francis R. (1969) The Changing American Legal System: Some Selected Phases. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, William Francis (1912 [1894]) A Treatise on the Law of Personal Injuries. 2d ed. Vol. 1. Chicago: Callahan and Co.Google Scholar
Barrows, Morton (1900) Handbook on the Law of Negligence. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Randolph E. (1992) Courting Danger: Injury and Law in New York City, 1870-1910. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) “The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field.” Hastings Law Review 38: 814-53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William, and Seidman, Robert (1982) Law, Order, and Power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William, and Zatz, Marjorie (1993) Making Law: The State and Structural Contradictions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant (1995) “Merchants of law as moral entrepreneurs: Constructing international justice from the competition for transnational business disputes.” Law and Society Review 29: 27–64.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. (1991) “Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920-1940,” in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 267-92.Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Work Place in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard (1982) “The historical origins and economic structure of workers’ compensation law.” Georgia Law Review 16: 775, 819.Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul (1987) “Slaves as fellow servants: Ideology, law, and industrialization.” American Journal of Legal History 31: 269–305.Google Scholar
Fish, Asa I., and Wharton, Henry (1858) “Master and servant—Negligence—Liability of the master to his servant on account of injuries occasioned by the negligence of a fellow servant.” American Law Register 6: 449-57.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1973) The History of American Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., and Ladinsky, Jack (1967) “Social change and the law of industrial accidents.” Columbia Law Review 67: 50, 82.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert (1975) “Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the common law tradition in American legal historiography.” Law and Society Review 10: 9–55.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert (1984) “Critical legal histories.” Stanford Law Review 36: 57, 125.Google Scholar
Griswold, Wendy (1987) “A methodological framework for the sociology of culture.” Sociological Methodology 17: 1–36.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael (1991) “Social history update: ‘Fighting faiths’ and the challenges of legal history.” Journal of Social History 25: 191–201.Google Scholar
Hagan, John (1980) “The legislation of crime and delinquency: A review of theory, method, and research.” Law and Society Review 14: 603-28.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary G., and Sutton, John R. (1989) “The problem of control in the weak state: Domination in the United States, 1880-1920.” Theory and Society 18: 1, 46.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B., and Yngvesson, Barbara (1990) “Interpretive sociolegal research.” Law and Social Inquiry 15 (1): 135-48.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (1994) “Snakes in Ireland: A conversation with Willard Hurst.” Law and History Review 12: 370-90.Google Scholar
Hilliard, Frances (1859) The Law of Torts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Marland C. (1888-89) “Statutory changes in employers’ liability.” Harvard Law Review 2: 212-30.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr., (1995 [1873]) “Theory of torts,” in Novick, Sheldon M. (ed.) The Collected Works of Justice Holmes. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 326-34.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1977) The Transformation of American Law, 1780-1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1992) The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, Drew, and Greenberg, David F. (1981) “The dialectics of crime control,” in Greenberg, David F. (ed.) Crime and Capitalism. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield: 209-54.Google Scholar
Hurst, Willard (1956) Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kantor, Shawn E., and Fishback, Price V. (1994) “Coalition formation and the adoption of workers’ compensation: The case of Missouri, 1911-1926,” in Goldin, Claudia and Libecap, Gary (eds.) The Regulated Economy: An Historical Approach to Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 259-97.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul (1991) “The source of a myth: Police powers of the states and laissez faire constitutionalism, 1900-1937.” American Journal of Legal History 35: 70–98.Google Scholar
Labatt, C. B. (1913) Commentaries on the Law of Master and Servant. Rochester, NY: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W. (1957) The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Licht, Walter (1983) Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl (1960) The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Malone, Wex S. (1946) “The formative era of contributory negligence.” Illinois Law Review 41: 151.Google Scholar
Marston, Jerrilyn (1984) “The creation of a common law rule, 1837-1860.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132: 579.Google Scholar
McKinney, William M. (1890) A Treatise on the Law of Fellow Servants. Northport, NY: Edward Thompson Company.Google Scholar
Miller, Edgar (1886) “Fellow servants.” American Law Register 25: 481-93.Google Scholar
Milner, Neal (1989) “The denigration of rights and the persistence of rights talk: A cultural portrait.” Law and Social Inquiry 14: 631.Google Scholar
Moglen, Eben (1993) “Book review: The transformation of Morton Horwitz.” Columbia Law Review 93: 1042-59.Google Scholar
Osgood, William W. (1891) Employer’s Liability. Boston: F. H. Hodges.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1938) The Formative Era of American Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert (1981) “The historical development of the fault principle.” Georgia Law Review 15: 925.Google Scholar
Rogers, Donald (1995) “From common law to factory laws: The transformation of workplace safety law in Wisconsin before progressivism.” American Journal of Legal History 39:177–213.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard (1993) Main Currents in American Legal Thought. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary T. (1981) “Tort law and the economy in nineteenth-century America: A reinterpretation.” Yale Law Journal 90: 1717.Google Scholar
Shearman, Thomas G., and Redfield, Amasa A. (1888) A Treatise on the Law of Negligence. New York: Baker, Voorhis.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1993) “For the government of its servants: Law and disciplinary power in the work place, 1870-1906.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 13: 105.Google Scholar
Smith, James Charles (1977) “Book review: The transformation of American law, 1780-1860, by Morton Horwitz.” Wisconsin Law Review 1977: 1253-76.Google Scholar
Soifer, Aviam (1992) “Willard Hurst, consensus history, and the growth of American law.” Reviews in American History 20: 124-44.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl F. (1993) “The commentaries of Chancellor James Kent and the development of American common law.” American Journal of Legal History 37: 440-63.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann (1986) “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273-86.Google Scholar
Telkampf, J. Louis (1841) “On codification, or the systematizing of the law.” American Jurist 26 (51): 113-44.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1988) “A mysterious power: Industrial accidents and the legal construction of employment relations in Massachusetts, 1800-1850.” Law and History Review 6: 375.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. (1993) Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin (1980) “State courts and protective legislation during the Progressive Era: A reevaluation.” Journal of American History 72: 63.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward (1980) Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar