Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T15:10:56.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reexamining the Nineteenth-Century Presidency and Partisan Press: The Case of President Grant and the Whiskey Ring Scandal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

Jennifer Rose Hopper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the institutional development of the presidency and popular leadership by presidents over time lead us to contrary expectations as to how a nineteenth-century president would react to a major political scandal. Scholarship on newspapers of the late 1800s is also unclear on how a quasipartisan media, with some outlets moving toward independence, would cover a White House scandal. I find that a close analysis of the case of President Ulysses S. Grant and the Whiskey Ring scandal forces us to reconsider what we assume to be firmly modern developments in both presidential studies and media history. Though a supposedly “premodern” president, Grant still mounted a concerted effort to mitigate the damage of the scandal. Further, although the president could get his version of events across in prominent newspapers, Republican newspaper coverage was hardly reliable. Newspapers also connected politicians’ character and psychology to mistakes made in office and made presidential strategies to shape public perception clear to their audiences—emphases on political gamesmanship considered hallmarks of the modern media environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Spring 2018 , pp. 109 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archival Sources

Chicago Tribune (1876) “Midnight News,” February 8a.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “A New Whisky Conspiracy,” February 8b.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Comments: The Vigor of the Prosecution,” February 9a.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Midnight News,” February 9b.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) No Title, February 10a.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Outside: The President's Deposition,” February 10b.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) No Title, February 11a.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Tutton's Treachery,” February 11b.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Whiskey: Proceedings Yesterday in the Trial of Babcock at St. Louis,” February 12.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Hoge: Development of the Scheme to Offer This Choice Creature Vicariously,” February 16.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Washington: The President's Order,” February 17.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Trial of Gen. Babcock,” February 18.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Grant and Bristow—Lincoln and Chase: A Comparison,” February 20.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Whisky: Statement of the Relations Existing between Grant and Bristow,” February 23.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “The President and Mr. Bristow,” February 24.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1876) “Bluford Wilson's Narrative,” July 30.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “General Babcock's Trial,” February 9.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Circumstances Alter Cases,” February 10.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Babcock's Cipher,” February 15a.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Wait Till the Election Is Over,” February 15b.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “The President and the Attorney General,” February 16.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “President Grant's ‘Happy Family,’” February 17.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Attorney General Pierrepont's Circular to the District Attorneys,” February 18.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “The Bottom Fact in Whiskey,” February 19.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Will Mr. Pierrepont Explain?,” February 21.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “The Cabinet Changes,” February 22.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Was Babcock a Party to It?,” February 24a.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Judge Porter on the Press,” February 24b.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Who Perpetrated the ‘Gross Impropriety’?,” February 24c.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “The Acquittal of General Babcock,” February 25.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “A Treasury Scandal: President Grant Demanding the Instant Resignation of the Head of the Special Agency Bureau,” July 1.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Grant and Yaryan,” July 3.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Bluford Wilson's Testimony,” July 28a.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Washington: Testimony of Bluford Wilson before the Whiskey Trials Committee: The President Completely Exonerated,” July 28b.Google Scholar
New York Herald (1876) “Washington: From Our Special Correspondent: Effect of the Bluford Wilson Testimony,” July 30.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “The Great Whiskey Trial: President Grant's Private Secretary Arraigned,” February 9.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “The White House Ring Demoralized; What the Telegrams Will Prove,” February 10.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Grant's Deposition,” February 16.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Gen. Babcock's Defense,” February 17a.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Ex-Attorney General Williams's Address,” February 17b.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “US Grant's Deposition: The Document That Was Filed in the Babcock Case,” February 18a.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Gen. Babcock's Defence [sic]: The Improbable Story of a St. Louis Letter Carrier,” February 18b.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Pension Frauds,” February 19.Google Scholar
New York Sun (1876) “Grant and the Whiskey Ring,” July 31.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “Proceedings of the Court; The President and Secretary Bristow,” February 9.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “The Trial of Gen. Babcock; The President's Deposition. Points of the Testimony Taken in the White House—The President's Evidence Fortified by Papers and Telegrams,” February 14.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) No Title, February 15.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “The Trial of Gen. Babcock; Close of the Prosecution,” February 16.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “The Trial of Gen. Babcock; The Arguments in the Case,” February 20a.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) No Title, February 20b.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) No Title, July 6.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “Commissioner Pratt Resigns,” July 12.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “Gov. Jewell's Reception,” July 18.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “Washington: The Whisky Prosecutions,” July 28.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “The Whisky Frauds: Testimony of Bluford Wilson,” July 29.Google Scholar
New York Times (1876) “Washington. Mr. Yaryan's Resignation,” July 1. Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “A Remarkable Defense,” February 9.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Babcock's Friends Demoralized—Remarkable Stories about the President,” February 11a.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Will the President Interfere? Serious Charges He Will from a Republican Journal,” February 11b.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “’Rebel Influence,’” February 12.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “A Strong Case,” February 17.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Note of the Trial,” February 19a.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “A Cabinet Crisis,” February 19b.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Judge Pierrepont's Letter,” February 19c.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “The Babcock Case,” February 21a.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Solicitor Wilson,” February 21b.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “Too Much Baby Act,” February 22.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “The Case Against Gen. Babcock,” February 23a.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “The President and the Courts,” February 23b.Google Scholar
New York Tribune (1876) “The Acquittal of Gen. Babcock,” February 25.Google Scholar

References

Altheide, David L. (1976) Creating Reality: How TV News Distorts Events. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
American Newspaper Directory of 1875 (1875) New York: George P. Rowell and Co.Google Scholar
Azari, Julia R. (2013) “Institutional change and the presidential mandate.” Social Science History 37 (4): 483–514.Google Scholar
Baldasty, Gerald J. (1992) The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Basinger, Scott J., and Rottinghaus, Brandon (2012) “Stonewalling and suspicion during presidential scandals.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 290–302.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (2005) News: The Politics of Illusion, 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Benoit, William L. (1995) Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Meyer (1951) The Story of the New York Times, 1851–1951. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Bimes, Terri, and Mulroy, Quinn (2004) “The rise and decline of presidential populism.” Studies in American Political Development 18 (2): 136–59.Google Scholar
Busby, Robert (2001) Defending the American Presidency: Clinton and the Lewinsky Scandal. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Karen, and Schnell, Frauke (2005) Framing American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph A., and Jamieson, Kathleen H. (1997) Spiral of Cynicism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, Joseph A., and Jamieson, Kathleen H. (1998) “The role of the press in the health care reform debate of 1993–1994,” in Graber, Doris, McQuall, Denis, and Norris, Pippa (eds.) The Politics of News, the News of Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press: 110–31.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N. (2007a) “Framing theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10(1): 103–26.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N. (2007b) “A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. (2008) The Presidency in the Era of 24-Hour News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Elmer (1969) History of the New York Times 1851–1921. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Denton, Robert E., and Holloway, Rachel L., eds. (2003) Images, Scandal, and Communication Strategies of the Clinton Presidency. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
DiSalvo, Daniel (2012) Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. (2012) Overreach: Leadership in the Obama Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (1991) “Framing United States coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents.” Journal of Communication 41 (4): 6–27.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (1993) “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (2012) Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Evensen, Bruce J. (2001–2) “‘Saucepan journalism’ in an age of indifference: Moody, Beecher, and Brooklyn's gilded press.” Journalism History 27 (4): 165–77.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and Robert Lichter, S. (2006) The Mediated Presidency: Television News and Presidential Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and Robert Lichter, S. (2011) The Nightly News Nightmare: Media Coverage of US Presidential Elections, 1988–2008, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Smith, Renee M. (1998) “Presidents, parties, and the public: Evolving patterns of interaction, 1877–1929,” in Ellis, Richard J. (ed.) Speaking to the People: The Rhetorical Presidency in Historical Perspective. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press: 87–111.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. (1979) “Change and continuity in the modern presidency,” in King, Anthony (ed.) The New American Political System. Washington, DC: AEI: 45–85.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James T. (2004) All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heith, Diane J. (2013) The Presidential Road Show: Public Leadership in an Era of Party Polarization and Media Fragmentation. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Hesseltine, William B. (1935) Ulysses S. Grant: Politician. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Karen S. (2010) Popular Leadership in the Presidency: Origins and Practice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hopper, Jennifer R. (2013) “Pardoning the president: President Clinton, the Lewinsky scandal, and the politics of presidential redemption.” White House Studies 13 (2): 159–86.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y. (2000) Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen H., and Waldman, Paul (2003) The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists and the Stories the Shook the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Junger, Richard (2010) Becoming the Second City: Chicago's Mass News Media, 1833–1898. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Richard L. (2002) Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel (2010) The Nationalization of American Political Parties, 1880–1896. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Martha J. (2007) Managing the President's Message: The White House Communications Operation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kuypers, Jim A. (2006) Bush's War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Kuypers, Jim A., ed. (2009) Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kuypers, Jim A., and D'Angelo, Paul, eds. (2010) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuypers, Jim A., Cooper, Stephen D., and Althouse, Matthew T. (2012) “George W. Bush, the American press, and the initial framing of the War on Terror after 9/11,” in Denton, Robert E. Jr. (ed.) The George W. Bush Presidency: A Rhetorical Perspective. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books: 89–112.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (2004) Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Laracey, Mel (2008) “Talking without speaking, and other curiosities,” in Medhurst, Martin J. (ed.) Before the Rhetorical Presidency. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1985) The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McGerr, Michael E. (1986) The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. (1999) “Sex, politics, and public opinion: What political scientists really learned from the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal.” PS: Political Science 32 (4): 721–29.Google Scholar
Center, Miller (2017) “Presidential speeches: Bill Clinton presidency: August 17, 1998,” https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/august-17-1998-statement-his-testimony-grand-jury (accessed May 26, 2017).Google Scholar
Mindich, David (1998) Just the Facts: How “Objectivity” Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard (1990) Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nevins, Allan (1967) Hamilton Fish: The Inner History of the Grant Administration, Volume Two. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nichols, David K. (1994) The Myth of the Modern Presidency. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Novotny, Patrick (2014) The Press in American Politics, 1787–2012. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. (1993) Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. (2003) The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, James P. (1994) The Modern Presidency. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Polakoff, Keith I. (1973) The Politics of Inertia: The Election of 1876 and the End of Reconstruction. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, James E. (1947) The Presidents and the Press. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Reese, Stephen D., Gandy, Oscar H. Jr., and Grant, August E. (2001) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rives, Timothy (2000) “Grant, Babcock, and the Whiskey Ring.” Prologue: Quarterly of the National Archives and Records Administration 32 (3).Google Scholar
Rubin, Richard L. (1981) Press, Party, and Presidency. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Sabato, Larry J. (1991) Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael (1978) Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (2001) The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. H. (1977) The Press, Politics, and Patronage: The American Government's Use of Newspapers, 1789–1875. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Smythe, T. C. (2003) The Gilded Age Press, 1865–1900. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stanyer, James, and Wring, Dominic (2004) “Public images, private lives: An introduction.” Parliamentary Affairs 57 (1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Stone, Culver (1938) Dana and The Sun. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.Google Scholar
Stuckey, Mary E. (1997) Strategic Failures in the Modern Presidency. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Summers, Mark W. (1994) The Press Gang: Newspapers and Politics, 1865–1878. Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tebbel, John, and Watts, Sarah M. (1985) The Press and the Presidency: From George Washington to Ronald Reagan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey (1987) The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, Gadi (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar