Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:53:55.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical Models in Social History Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Patrick M. Horan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is conventional in the social sciences to treat the worlds of theory and empirical analysis as separate and distant from one another, and the theory construction literature is replete with proposed solutions to the problem of “bridging the gap” between theory and empirical practice. But for purposes of understanding empirical research literatures, especially interdisciplinary literatures such as those in social history research, the more pressing problem may be separating out theoretical and observational elements within existing research practice. Whether we are trying to “bring theory in” to our research setting or trying to identify that which has already been embedded in the research of others, we are engaged in the construction of theoretical models. This paper begins with Murphey’s discussion of the “theory-laden” nature of historical research, and uses this as a stepping-stone into an elaboration of how theoretical model building can contribute to our understanding of empirical research in social history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Winter 1987 , pp. 379 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Jerry Clubb, Peggy Hargis, Erik Monkkonen, Lore Wright, Deborah Tootle and an anonymous reader on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References

Blalock, H. M. (1961) Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. M. (1969) Theory Construction. EngleWood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Brown, H. (1977) Perception, Theory and Commitment. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Clubb, J. M. (1985) “Murray Murphey and the possibility of Social Science History.” Social Science History 9: 93–104.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1972) Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, M. B., Doucet, Michael J., and Stern, Mark J. (1982) The Social Organization of Early Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
McClelland, P. D. (1975) Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, K. O., Vinovskis, M., and Hareven, T. K. (1978) “Women’s work and the life course in Essex County, Massachusetts, 1880,” Chap. 6 in Hareven, T. K. (ed.) Transitions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. G. (1973) Our Knowledge of the Historical Past. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Potter, D. M. (1963) “Explicit data and implicit assumptions in historical study,” in Gottschalk, L. (ed.) Generalization in the Writing of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1978) Theoretical Methods in Social History Research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (1974) The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar