Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:57:01.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Estimates of Census Coverage in the United States, 1850–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

J. David Hacker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite growing reliance on census data for historical research in the United States, there has been little systematic evaluation of census quality. This article relies on back-projection methods, new estimates of nineteenth-century mortality, and the 1850–1940 Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) samples to estimate age- and sex-specific net census underenumeration of the native-born white population in the United States in the 1850–1930 censuses. National and section of birth estimates are constructed. In general, the results suggest slightly higher net undercounts for native-born white males relative to native-born white females, slightly higher net undercounts in the South, and a modest trend toward greater census coverage over time. A few censuses stand out as anomalous. The 1870 census suffered a higher net rate of omission than any other census. The net undercount was especially high in the South, probably reflecting the unsettled conditions in the aftermath of the American Civil War. The net undercount was not nearly as great as nineteenth-century observers speculated and subsequent historians have long believed, however. The 1880 census appears to have achieved the most complete coverage of the native-born white population before 1940.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Spring 2013 , pp. 71 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. W.Kasakoff, A. B. (1991) “Estimates of census underenumeration based on genealogies.” Social Science History 15 (4): 527–44.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J. (1988) The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J.Fienberg, S. E. (1999) Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cassedy, J. H. (1969) Demography in Early America: Beginnings of the Statistical Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J.Zelnik, M. (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States: A Study of Annual White Births from 1855 to 1960 and of Completeness of Enumeration in the Censuses from 1880 to 1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Condon, K. M. (2010) “Historical coverage patterns of blacks in the United States census: An application of age-period-cohort analysis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, TX, April 15.Google Scholar
Condon, K. M.Judson, D.Robinson, J. G. (2008) “Historical coverage patterns in the United States census: An application of age-period-cohort analysis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, Greenville, SC, November 1.Google Scholar
Cullen, C. T.Sheridan, E. R.Lester, R. W., eds. (1986) The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 22. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. P. (1985) “Duration of residence in the 1855 census of New York State.” Historical Methods 18 (1): 5–12.Google Scholar
DeBats, D. A. (1991) “Hide and seek: The historian and nineteenth-century social accounting.” Social Science History 15 (4): 545–63.Google Scholar
Ferrie, J. P. (1996) “A new sample of males linked from the public use microdata sample of the 1850 U.S. federal census of population to the 1860 U.S. federal census manuscript schedules.” Historical Methods 29 (4): 141–56.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F.Strong, D.Crawford, A. G. (1979) “What happened when the census was re-done? An analysis of the recount of 1870 in Philadelphia.” Sociology and Social Research 63 (3): 475–503.Google Scholar
Gannett, H. (1881) “The alleged census frauds in the South.” International Review 10: 459–67.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, C. A. (1988) “Estimates and correlates of enumeration completeness: Censuses and maps in nineteenth-century Massachusetts.” Social Science History 12 (1): 71–86.Google Scholar
Glover, J. W. (1921) United States Life Tables, 1890, 1901, 1910, and 1901–1910. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. D. (1997) “Trends and determinants of adult mortality in early New England: Reconciling old and new evidence from the long eighteenth century.” Social Science History 21 (4): 481–519.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. D. (2003) “Rethinking the ‘early’ decline of marital fertility in the United States.” Demography 40 (4): 605–20.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. D. (2010) “Decennial life tables for the white population of the United States, 1790–1900.” Historical Methods 43 (2): 45–79.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (1998) “Estimated life tables for the United States, 1850–1910.” Historical Methods 31 (4): 149–69.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (2000) “The white population of the United States, 1790–1920,” in Haines, M. R.Steckel, R. H. (eds.) A Population History of North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 305–70.Google Scholar
Hogan, H. (1993) “The 1990 post-enumeration survey: Operations and results.” Journal of the American Statistical Association (423): 1047–60.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. H. (1957) “An estimate of the expectation of life in the United States in 1850.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 35 (2): 197–201.Google Scholar
King, M. L.Magnuson, D. L. (1995) “Perspectives of historical U.S. census undercounts.” Social Science History 19 (4): 455–66.Google Scholar
Knights, P. R. (1991) “Potholes in the road of improvement? Estimating census underenumeration by longitudinal tracing: U.S. censuses, 1850–1880.” Social Science History 15 (4): 517–26.Google Scholar
Kunze, K. (1979) “The effects of age composition and changes in vital rates on nineteenth century population estimates from new data.” PhD diss., University of Utah.Google Scholar
Land, K. C.Hough, G. C.McMillan, M. M. (1984) “New midyear age-sex-color-specific estimates of the U.S. population for the 1940s and 1950s: Including a revision of coverage estimates for the 1940 and 1950 censuses.” Demography 21 (4): 623–45.Google Scholar
Levy, D. S. (1996) “Long-run geographic and temporal changes in mortality in the colonial South.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, New Orleans, LA, October 8.Google Scholar
McClelland, P. D.Zeckhauser, R. J. (1982) Demographic Dimensions of the New Republic: American Interregional Migration, Vital Statistics, and Manumissions, 1800–1860. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, C. L. (1992) “Adult mortality in America before 1900: A view from family histories,” in Goldin, C.Rockoff, H. (eds.) Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 267–96.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H. (1976) Mortality Patterns in National Populations: With Special Reference to Recorded Causes of Death. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H.Elo, I. T.Hill, M. E.Rosenwaike, I. (2003) The Demography of African Americans, 1930–1990. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G. (2001) “ESCAP II: Demographic analysis results.” Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy II, Report no. 1, US Census Bureau, October 13, www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/Report1.PDF.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G.Ahmed, B.Gupta, P. DasWoodrow, K. A. (1993) “Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association (423): 1061–74.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G.West, K. K. (2000) “Demographic analysis,” in Anderson, M. J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the U.S. Census. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press: 164–68.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G.West, K. K.Adlakha, A. (2002) “Coverage of the population in census 2000: Results from demographic analysis.” Population Research and Policy Review 21 (1–2): 19–38.Google Scholar
Ruggles, S.Alexander, J. T.Genadek, K.Goeken, R.Schroeder, M. B.Sobek, M. (2010) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Sparks, J., ed. (1839) The Writings of George Washington. Vol. 10. Boston: Andrews.Google Scholar
Steckel, R. H. (1983) “The economic foundations of east-west migration during the nineteenth century.” Explorations in Economic History 20 (1): 14–35.Google Scholar
Steckel, R. H. (1991) “The quality of census data for historical inquiry: A research agenda.” Social Science History 15 (4): 579–99.Google Scholar
Steckel, R. H. (1995) “Stature and the standard of living.” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (4): 1903–40.Google Scholar
Stephenson, C. (1980) “The methodology of historical census record linkage: A user’s guide to the Soundex.” Journal of Family History 5 (1): 112–15.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1906) Special Reports: Supplementary Analysis and Derivative Tables of the Twelfth Census of the U.S., 1900. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial Edition, part 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1977) Developmental Estimates of the Coverage of the Population of the States in the 1970 Census: Demographic Analysis. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (2003) Technical Assessment of A.C.E. Revision II, March 12, www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/ACETechAssess.pdf.Google Scholar
US Census Office (1872) Ninth Census. Vol. 1, The Statistics of the Population of the United States . . . Compiled from the Original Returns of the Ninth Census (June 1, 1870). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Census Office (1895) Report on the Population of the United States at the Eleventh Census of the Population: 1890. Vol. 1. New York: Ross.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, M. A. (1978) “The Jacobson life table of 1850: A critical re-examination from a Massachusetts perspective.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (4): 703–24.Google Scholar
Walker, F. A. (1899a) “Enumeration of the population, 1870–1880,” in Dewey, D. R. (ed.) Discussions in Economics and Statistics. Vol. 2, Statistics, National Growth, Social Economics. New York: Holt: 61–65.Google Scholar
Walker, F. A. (1899b [1891]) “The great count of 1890,” in Dewey, D. R. (ed.) Discussions in Economics and Statistics. Vol. 2, Statistics, National Growth, Social Economics. New York: Holt: 111–24.Google Scholar
Winkle, K. (1991) “The United States census as a source in political history.” Social Science History 15 (4): 565–77.Google Scholar
Zelnik, M. (1961) “Age heaping in the United States: 1880–1950.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 39 (3): 540–73.Google Scholar