No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Labor Insurgency in Norway: The Crisis of 1917-1920
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
In the Winter 1980 special issue of Social Science History on working-class protest, James E. Cronin writes about labor insurgency during the European crisis of 1917-1920. He argues that a greater proportion of the semiskilled and unskilled workers were active in the 1917-1920 wave of insurgency than at any other time in our century. According to him, this emergent proletariat, created by rapid industrialization, constituted the very core of the insurgency. But he adds that many craftsmen, particularly in the engineering industry, were also strong supporters of the labor left (Cronin, 1980: 138-140).
The evidence is adduced from a number of European countries, but no mention is made of Scandinavia, except for one brief reference to Sweden (Cronin, 1980: 131). Actually the Scandinavian countries would seem to be relevant, and perhaps Norway more so than Sweden. In fact, the Scandinavian case has been cited by a number of authors as an illustration of the thesis that skilled workers and artisans represent the main obstacle to industrial militancy. The process of radicalism was much stronger in Norway than in either Denmark or Sweden, and it has been suggested that the pronounced differences in the economic development of the three Scandinavian countries provide an explanation. While growth of the manufacturing industry proceeded slowly and gradually in Sweden and particularly in Denmark, Norway experienced a sudden spurt of industrialization in the first two decades of this century.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1981
References
Angell, A. (1972) Politics and the Labour Movement in Chile. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Britt, D. and Galle, O. R. (1972) “Industrial conflict and unionization.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 37: 46–57.Google Scholar
Bull, E. Jr. (1922) “Die Entwicklung der Arbeiterbewegung in den drei skandinavischen Laendern.” Archiv fuer die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung. Leipzig, 10: 329ff.Google Scholar
Bull, E. Jr. (1939) Trönderne i norsk arbeiderbevegelse. Oslo. Reprinted in Tidsskrift for arbeiderbevegelsens historie 1 (1976): 1–147.Google Scholar
Cronin, J. E. (1980) “Labor insurgency and class formation: comparative perspectives on the crisis of 1917–1920 in Europe.” Social Science History 4: 125–152.Google Scholar
Galenson, W. [ed.] (1952) Comparative Labor Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Isaac, L., Mutran, E., and Stryker, S. (1980) “Political protest orientation among black and white adults.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 45 (April): 191–213.Google Scholar
Judt, T. (1979) Socialism in Provence 1871-1914. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, C. and Siegel, A. (1954) “The interindustry propensity to strike: an international comparison,” pp. 189–212 in Kornhauser, A. et al. (eds.) Industrial Conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. M. (1974) Industrialization, Community Structure, and Socialism: An Ecological Analysis of Norway, 1875-1924. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. M. (1971) Economic Development and the Response of Labor in Scandinavia: A Multi-Level Analysis. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Nilson, S. S. (1981) “Factional Strife in the Norwegian Labour Party.” J. of Contemporary History 16 (October).Google Scholar
Nilson, S. S. (1975) “Regional differences in Norway: with special references to labor radicalism and cultural norms.” Scandinavian Pol. Studies Yearbook 10: 123–137.Google Scholar
Petras, J. and Zeitlin, M. (1967–1968) “Miners and agrarian radicalism.” Soc. Rev. 32: 578–586.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. and Valen, H. (1960) “Parties, elections and political behaviour in the northern countries,” pp. 103–136 in Stammer, O. (ed.) Politische Forschung, Koeln: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar