Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:07.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household and State-istics: Cornerstones of Society in Population Censuses (Belgium, 1846–1947)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2015

Kaat Louckx  and
Raf Vanderstraeten
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Statistics originally meant state-istics, a scientific representation of the state for governmental purposes. It did not just cover the growing need for information in the emerging nation-states, but also contributed to establishing a new idea of government. This paper analyzes the rearticulation of the household within modern state-istics. The Belgian population censuses, which were first organized by Adolphe Quetelet, provide the material for our analyses. More particularly, we focus on the period from the mid-nineteenth until the mid-twentieth century, when the welfare state started to develop alternatives to household dependence. We discuss how the orientation shifted from the de facto to the de jure population; the state became involved in redefining the conditions for household membership. Two types of co-residential units were distinguished: family household and collective household. But inmates of collective households caused much concern; statisticians tried to reassign them administratively to households considered more appropriate. We also discuss the articulation of intrahousehold relations. Changes in the notion of “belongingness” show how the state articulated its expectations regarding the proverbial cornerstones of society.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 201 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxandall, P. (2004) Constructing Unemployment: The Politics of Joblessness in East and West. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bracke, N. (2008) Een monument voor het land. Overheidsstatistiek in België, 1795–1870. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Brian, E. (1989) “Y a-t-il un objet Congrès? Le cas du Congrès International de Statistique (1853–1876).” Cahiers Georges Sorel 7: 9–22.Google Scholar
Brian, E. (2002) “Transactions statistiques au XIXe siècle.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 145: 33–46.Google Scholar
Curtis, B. (2002) The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. (2008) Gouverner par les nombres: L'argument statistique II. Paris: Presses de l'École des Mines.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (2008) The Household: Informal Order around the Hearth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2006) Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1991) “How should we do the history of statistics?,” in Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 181–96.Google Scholar
Headrick, H. D. (2000) When Information Came of Age: Technologies of Knowledge in the Age of Reason and Revolution, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. (1995) The Rise of Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Laslett, P., and Wall, R. (1982) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1990) Soziologische Aufklärung 5. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1986) The Rise of Statistical Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (2012) “Reforming vision: The engineer Le Play learns to observe society sagely,” in Daston, L. and Lunbeck, E. (eds.) Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 281–302.Google Scholar
Prévost, J.-G., and Beaud, J.-P. (2012) Statistics, Public Debate and the State, 1800–1945: A Social, Political and Intellectual History of Numbers. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1873) Congrès international de statistique. Sessions de Bruxelles (1853), Paris (1855), Vienne (1857), Londres (1860), Berlin (1863), Florence (1867), La Haye (1869) et St-Pétersbourg (1872). Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique.Google Scholar
Randeraad, N. (2011) “The International Statistical Congress (1853–1876): Knowledge transfers and their limits.” European History Quarterly 41 (1): 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tadmor, N. (2004) Family and Friends in Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorvaldsen, G. (2006) “Away on census day: Enumerating the temporarily present or absent.” Historical Methods 39 (2): 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topalov, C. (1994) Naissance du chômeur. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, R. (2006) “Soziale Beobachtungsraster: Eine wissenssoziologische Analyse von statistischen Klassifikationsschemata.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35 (3): 193–211.Google Scholar
Vanderstraeten, R. (2014) “Religious activism in a secular world: The rise and fall of the teaching congregations of the Catholic Church.” Paedagogica Historica 50 (4): 494–513.Google Scholar
Wilk, R. R., and Netting, R. M. (1984) “Households: Changing forms and functions,” in Netting, R. M., Wilk, R. R., and Arnould, E. J. (eds.) Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group. Berkeley: University of California Press: 1–28.Google Scholar
Wobbe, T. (2012) “Making up people: Berufsstatistische Klassifikation, Geschlechtliche Kategorisierung und Wirtschaftliche Inklusion um 1900 in Deutschland.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, B. (2001) La constitution du chômage en Allemagne. Entre professions et territoires. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar