Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:52:01.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammars of Death

An Analysis of Nineteenth-Century Literal Causes of Death from the Age of Miasmas to Germ Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Douglas L. Anderton  and
Susan Hautaniemi Leonard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historical mortality analysis is often confounded by changing disease environments, diagnostic criteria, and terminology. Recorded causes of death are shaped by these local and historical contexts. We analyze changing literal causes of death during the shift from miasmatic to germ theories of disease using death records from two Massachusetts towns for selected years spanning 1850 to 1912. This analysis demonstrates that (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) classifications are more stable, yet potentially less informative, than the literal causes recorded in death accounts, (2) recorded causes of death often include additional qualifications and elaborations beyond basic literal causes of death, and the use of such qualifiers rose dramatically during the late nineteenth century, (3) social biases are clearly evident in the extent to which causes of death were further described or qualified, and (4) the additional descriptive qualification of deaths during this period of often ambiguous historical causes of death can potentially aid in efforts to classify causes of death and derive robust estimates of cause-specific mortality trends.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Spring 2004 , pp. 111 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, G., and Carmichael, A. (1996) “Studying causes of death in the past: Problems and models.” Historical Methods 29:44–48.Google Scholar
Anderton, D. L. (2003) “Disease: Concepts and classification,” in Demeny, P. and McNicoll, G. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Macmillan:247–50.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1986) “The invention of infant mortality.” Sociology of Health and Illness 8 (3) : 211–32.Google Scholar
Bartley, G., Smith, D., and Blane, D. (1997) “Vital comparisons: The social construction of mortality measurement,” in Elston, M. A. (ed.) The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell:127–52.Google Scholar
Bean, L. L., Mineau, G. P., and Anderton, D. L. (1990) Fertility Change on the American Frontier. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, M. (1991) “A minor office: The variable and socially constructed character of death certification in a Scottish city.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 32: 273–87.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L. (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cassedy, J. H. (1986) Medicine and American Growth, 1800-1860. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cestre, G. (1963) Northampton, Massachusetts: Evolution Urbaine. Paris: Société édition Enseignement Supérieur.Google Scholar
Dormandy, T. (1999) White Death: A History of Tuberculosis. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, P. (2000) Plague Time: The New Germ Theory of Disease. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Feldberg, G. D. (1995) Disease and Class: Tuberculosis and the Shaping of Modern North American Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fenn, E. A. (2001) Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1973) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Franzosi, R. (1994) “From words to numbers: A set theory framework for the collection, organization, and analysis of narrative data.” Sociological Methodology 24: 105–36.Google Scholar
Gittelsohn, A. M. (1982) “On the distribution of underlying causes of death.” American Journal of Public Health 72:133–40.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. (1939) Holyoke, Massachusetts: A Case History of the Industrial Revolution in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gutman, R. (1956) “The accuracy of vital statistics in Massachusetts, 1842-1901.” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. (2000) “The white population of the United States, 1790-1920,” in Haines, M. R. and Steckel, R. H. (eds.) A Population History of North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 305–69.Google Scholar
Hamlin, C. (1995) “Could you starve to death in England in 1839? The Chadwick-Farr controversy and the loss of the ‘social’ in public health.” American Journal of Public Health 85: 856–66.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. (1994) “‘Death is the cure of all diseases’: Using the General Register Office cause of death statistics for 1837-1920.” Social History of Medicine 7: 472–92.Google Scholar
Hautaniemi, S. I. (2002) “Demography and death in emergent industrial cities of New England.” Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hautaniemi, S. I., Anderton, D. L., and Swedlund, A. C. (2000) “Methods and validity of a panel study using record linkage: Matching 1850-1912 death records to a geographic census sample in two Massachusetts towns.” Historical Methods 33: 16–29.Google Scholar
Hautaniemi, S. I., Swedlund, A. C., and Anderton, D. L. (1999) “Mill town mortality: Consequences of industrial growth in two Nineteenth-century New England towns.” Social Science History 23:1–39.Google Scholar
Hess, V. (1993) Von der Semiotischen zur Diagnostischen Medizin: Die Entstehung der Klinischen Methode zwishen 1750 und 1850 [From the semiotic to the diagnostic medicine: The formation of the clinical method 1750 to 1850]. Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenshaften, No. 66. Husum, Germany: Matthiesen.Google Scholar
Hetzel, A. M. (1997) “History and organization of the vital statistics system,” in U.S. Vital Statistics System: Major Activities and Developments, 1950-95. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics:43–46.Google Scholar
Howard-Jones, N. (1974) “Cholera nomenclature and nosology: A historical note.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 51:317–24.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Leadbeatter, S. (1986) “Semantics of death certification.” Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 20:129–32.Google Scholar
Lindahl, B. I. B. , Glattre, E., Lahti, R., Magnusson, G., and Mosbech, J. (1990) “The WHO principles for registering cause of death: Suggestions for improvement.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43:467–74.Google Scholar
Massachusetts General Court (1849) Legislative Documents of the House of the General Court of the Commonwealth, 1849, Document no. 65. Documents Collection, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Maudsley, G., and Williams, E. M. I. (1996) “Inaccuracy in death certification: Where are we now?”Journal of Public Health Medicine 18:59–66.Google Scholar
Melosi, M. V. (2000) The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meslé, F., and Vallin, J. (1996) “Reconstructing long-term series of causes of death.”Historical Methods 29:72–87.Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics (2000) MMDS Version 2000 Software: Printed Help Documentation for SuperMICAR, PCMICAR, MICAR200, ACME/TRANSAX. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Perron, M., Veillette, S., Rainville, M., Hebert, G., Bouchard, C., Tremblay, C., and Otis, J. (1991) “Differenciation sociale et spatiale de la mortalite au Saguenay (Quebec) : Validation d’un registre de deces pour des analyses a micro-echelle.” Espace, Populations, Societes 1:223–34.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H., and Haines, M. R. (1991) Fatal Years: Child Mortality in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quain, R. (1884) A Dictionary of Medicine. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Risse, G. (1997) “Cause of death as a historical problem.” Continuity and Change 12: 175–88.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.W. (1997) “A generic semantic grammar for quantitative text analysis: Applications to East and West Berlin radio news content from 1979.” Sociological Methodology 27: 89–129.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, C. E. (1962) The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Slater, D. N. (1993) “Certifying the cause of death: An audit of wording inaccuracies.” Journal of Clinical Pathology 46:232–34.Google Scholar
Snow, J. (1965) Snow on Cholera. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Starr, P. (1982) The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A. (1990) “Infant mortality in Massachusetts and the United States in the nineteenth century,” in Swedlund, A. C. and Armelagos, G. J. (eds.) Disease in Populations in Transition: Anthropological and Epidemiological Perspectives. New York: Bergin and Garvey: 161–82.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Official Version ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, Sixth Edition Issued October 1996. Vols. 1–3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Willigan, J. D., and Lynch, K. A. (1982) Sources and Methods of Historical Demography. New York: Academic.Google Scholar