Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:39:10.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questioning the Vulnerability Zeitgeist: Care and Control Practices with ‘Vulnerable’ Young People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2013

Kate Brown
Kate Brown*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides insights into how the concept of vulnerability operates in welfare and disciplinary processes for young people who are considered ‘vulnerable’. It reports from empirical qualitative research conducted in a large city in England which included interviews with vulnerable young people and with professionals working with this group. Findings highlight that despite differences of opinion about what constitutes ‘vulnerability’, it is a popular and powerful conceptual mechanism which underpins the delivery of service interventions for certain young people. A relationship between vulnerability and ‘transgression’ is revealed, calling into question dichotomous representations of young people as either ‘vulnerable victims’ or ‘dangerous wrong-doers’. It is argued that whilst it can be utilised in the pursuit of more ‘caring’ interventions with those who are seen to be ‘in need’, vulnerability is also a concept relevant to debates concerning selective welfare systems and behavioural regulation.

Keywords

Vulnerabilityvulnerableyoung peoplesocial controlconditionality
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 371 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, N. (2006) ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change, 16, 3, 268–81.Google Scholar
Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B. and Jorgensen, S. L. (2001) ‘Vulnerability: a view from different disciplines’, Social Protection Discussion Paper, No.0015, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. and Honneth, A. (2005) ‘Autonomy, vulnerability, recognition, and justice’, in Christman, J. and Anderson, A. (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001) ‘Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research’, Qualitative Research, 1, 3, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankoff, G., Frerks, G. and Hilhorst, T. (eds.) (2004) Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Batty, E. and Flint, J. (2013) ‘Talking ‘bout poor folks (thinking ‘bout my folks): perspectives on comparative poverty in working class households’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 13, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2009) World at Risk, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, A. (2006) Citizenship and Vulnerability: Disability and Issues of Social and Political Engagement, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2012) ‘Re-moralising “vulnerability”’, people, place and policy online, 6, 1, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. (forthcoming) ‘Beyond protection: “the vulnerable” in the age of austerity’, in Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (eds.), Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the Not-so-Big Society, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. and Patrick, R. (2012) ‘Re-moralising or de-moralising? The coalition government's approach to “problematic” populations’, People, Place and Policy Online, 6, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2009) ‘Performativity, precarity and sexual politics’, Lecture given at UniversiDad Complutense de Madrid, 8 June, AIBR Revista de Anthropologia Iberomericana, 4, 3, i–xiii.Google Scholar
Bynner, J. (2001) ‘Childhood risks and protective factors in social exclusion’, Children and Society, 15, 5, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (1989) ‘Vulnerability, coping and policy’, Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Bulletin, 37, 4, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conolly, A. (2008) ‘Challenges of generating qualitative data with socially excluded young people’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 3, 201–14.Google Scholar
Cramer, H. (2005) ‘Informal and gendered practices in a homeless person's unit’, Housing Studies, 20, 5, 737–51.Google Scholar
Culpitt, I. (1999) Social Policy and Risk, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Daniel, B. (2010) ‘Concepts of adversity, risk, vulnerability and resilience: a discussion in the context of the “child protection system”’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 2, 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. and Melrose, M. (1999) Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Children Schools and Families (2009) Safeguarding Children and Young People from Sexual Exploitation, London: HM Government.Google Scholar
Department for Education (2011) Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation Action Plan, London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Home Office (2000) Safeguarding Children Involved in Prostitution: Supplementary Guidance to Working Together to Safeguard Children, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Dobson, R. (2011) ‘Conditionality and homelessness services: practice realities from a drop-in centre’, Social Policy and Society, 10, 1, 547–58.Google Scholar
Dodds, S. (2007) ‘Depending on care: recognition of vulnerability and the social construction of care provision’, Bioethics, 21, 9, 500–10.Google Scholar
Dunn, M., Clare, I. and Holland, A. (2008) ‘To empower or protect? Constructing the “vulnerable adult” in English law and public policy’, Legal Studies, 28, 2, 234–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, P. (2004) ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29, 2, 265–87.Google Scholar
Emmel, N. D. and Hughes, K. (2010) ‘Recession, it's all the same to us son? The longitudinal experience (1999–2010) of deprivation’, Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences: 21st Century Society, 5, 2, 171–81.Google Scholar
Emmel, N. and Hughes, K. (forthcoming) ‘Vulnerability, inter-generational exchange, and the conscience of generations’, in Holland, J. and Edwards, R. (eds.), Understanding Families over Time: Research and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Fawcett, B. (2009) ‘Vulnerability: questioning the certainties in social work and health’, International Social Work, 52, 4, 473–84.Google Scholar
Fionda, J. (2005) Devils and Angels: Youth Policy and Crime, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. (2008) ‘The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Flint, J. (2006) ‘Housing and the new governance of conduct’, in Flint, J. (ed.), Housing, Urban Governance and Anti-Social Behaviour: Perspectives, Policy Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, London: Harvester PressGoogle Scholar
Furedi, F. (2003) A Culture of Fear Revisited: Risk taking and the Morality of Low Expectation, 4th edition, London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. (2007) Invitation to Terror: The Expanding Empire of the Unknown, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. (2008) ‘Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response’, Social Policy and Administration, 42, 6, 645–61.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. J. (1976) ‘The sacred and profane uses of labels’, Exceptional Children, 45, 3–7.Google Scholar
Goldson, B. (2000) ‘“Children in need” or “young offenders”? Hardening ideology, organisational change and new challenges for social work with children in trouble’, Child and Family Social Work, 5, 3, 255–65.Google Scholar
Goldson, B. (2002) ‘New Labour, social justice and children: political calculation and the deserving-undeserving schism’, British Journal of Social Work, 32, 6, 683–95.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-analysis of our Social Responsibilities, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. (2010) ‘The new behaviourism, the “real third way”, and housing futures: some ideas under development’, Housing in an Era of Change: Housing Studies Association Conference, University of York, 14–16 April, http://www.york.ac.uk/chp/hsa/spring10/papers.htm.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (2006) ‘Vulnerable people and the development of “regulatory therapy”’, in Dearling, A., Newburn, T. and Somerville, P. (eds.), Supporting Safer Communities: Housing, Crime and Neighborhoods, Coventry: CIH, pp. 155–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (eds.) (forthcoming) Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the Not-so-Big Society, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hasler, F. (2004) ‘Disability, care and controlling services’, in Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C. and Thomas, C. (eds.), Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hendrick, H. (1997) ‘Constructions and reconstructions of British childhood: an interpretative survey, 1800 to the present’, in James, A. and Prout, A. (eds.), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood, London: Falmer Press, pp. 34–62.Google Scholar
Hollomotz, A. (2009) ‘Beyond “vulnerability”: an ecological model approach to conceptualizing risk of sexual violence against people with learning difficulties’, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollomotz, A. (2011) Learning Difficulties and Sexual Vulnerability: A Social Approach, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
House of Commons Education Committee (2012) Children First: The Child Protection System in England, Fouth Report of Session 2012–13, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
James, A. and Prout, A. (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, 2nd edition, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Kemshall, H. (2002) ‘Key organizing principles of social welfare and the new risk-based welfare’, in Kemshall, H. (ed.), Risk, Social Policy and Welfare, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 24–41.Google Scholar
Kendall, S., Johnson, A., Gulliver, C., Martin, K. and Kinder, K. (2004) Evaluation of the Vulnerable Children Grant Part I, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. (1999) Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lansdown, G. (1994) ‘Children's rights’, in Mayall, B. (ed.), Children's Childhoods: Observed and Experienced, London: Falmer Press, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Lindley, S., O'Neill, J., Kandeh, J., Lawson, N., Christian, R. and O'Neill, M. (2011) Climate Change, Justice and Vulnerability, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (1999) Risk, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. (2009) ‘What is vulnerability’, International conference on ‘Vulnerability, Agency and Justice’, Macquarie University, Conference, Sydney, 13–15 August.Google Scholar
Malin, N., Wilmot, S. and Manthorpe, J. (2002) Key Concepts and Debates in Health and Social Policy, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mayall, B. (2002) Towards Sociology of Childhood: Thinking from Children's Lives, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, K. (2012) Surviving Identity: Vulnerability and the Psychology of Recognition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Misztal, B. (2011) The Challenges of Vulnerability: In Search of Strategies for a Less Vulnerable Social Life, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moon, G. (2000) ‘Risk and protection: the discourse of confinement in contemporary mental health policy’, Health and Place, 6, 3, 239–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran-Ellis, J. (2010) ‘Reflections on the sociology of childhood in the UK’, Current Sociology, 58, 2, 186–205.Google Scholar
Muncie, J. (2006) ‘Governing young people: coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 4, 770–93.Google Scholar
Nygard, M. (2009) ‘Competent actors or vulnerable objects? Constructions of children and state interventions among Finnish politicians in relation to the Child Protections Act 1983 and 2006’, Social Policy and Administration, 43, 5, 464–82.Google Scholar
O'Connell Davidson, J. (2011) ‘Moving children? Child trafficking, child migration and child rights’, Critical Social Policy, 31, 3, 454–77.Google Scholar
Passaro, J. (1996) The Unequal Homeless: Men on the Streets, Women in Their Place, Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. (1983) Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. and Wilkinson, I. (eds.) (2008) Health, Risk and Vulnerability, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phoenix, J. (2008) ‘ASBOs and working women: a new revolving door?’, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 289–303.Google Scholar
Phoenix, J. (2012a) ‘Sex work, sexual exploitations and consumerism’, in Carrington, K., Ball, M., O'Brien, E. and Tauri, J. (eds.), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: International Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 147–61.Google Scholar
Phoenix, J. (2012b) Out of Place: The Policing and Criminalisation of Sexually Exploited Girls and Young Women, London: The Howard League for Penal Reform.Google Scholar
Piper, C. (2008) Investing in Children: Policy, Law and Practice in Context, Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Quicke, J. and Winter, C. (1994) ‘Labelling and learning: an interactionist perspective’, Support for Learning, 9, 1, 16–21.Google Scholar
Richards, A. (2011) ‘The problem with “radicalisation”: the remit of “prevent” and the need to refocus on terrorism in the UK’, International Affairs, 87, 1, 143–52.Google Scholar
Riddick, B. (2000) ‘An examination of the relationship between labelling and stigmatisation with special reference to dyslexia’, Disability and Society, 15, 4, 653–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1762) Emile, translated by Foxley, B., London: Guernsey Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. Jr. and Keykhah, M. (2003) ‘Vulnerability and risk: some thoughts from a political and policy perspective’, Risk Analysis, 23, 4, 805–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scoular, J. and O'Neill, M. (2007) ‘Regulating prostitution: social inclusion, responsibilization and the politics of prostitution reform’, British Journal of Criminology, 47, 5, 764–78.Google Scholar
Such, E. and Walker, R. (2005) ‘Young citizens or policy objects? Children in the “rights and responsibilities” debate’, Journal of Social Policy, 34, 1, 39–57.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2000) Risk, Trust and Welfare, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (2006) Vulnerability and Human Rights, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Waiton, S. (2008) The Politics of Anti-Social Behaviour: Amoral Panics, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warner, J. (2008) ‘Community care, risk and the shifting locus of danger and vulnerability in mental health’, in Peterson, A. and Wilkinson, I. (eds.), Health, Risk and Vulnerability, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watts, M. J. and Bohle, H. G. (1993) ‘The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine’, Progress in Human Geography, 17, 1, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, G. (2003) ‘The sexual abuse of people with learning difficulties: do we need a social approach model approach to vulnerability?’, The Journal of Adult Protection, 5, 3, 14–27.Google Scholar
Van Loon, J. (2008) ‘Governmentality and the subpolitics of teenage sexual risk behaviour’ in Peterson, A. and Wilkinson, I. (eds.), Health, Risk and Vulnerability. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Youth Justice Board (2006) Asset, London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar