Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:37:31.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalisation, Democratisation and the Institutional Transformation of Taiwan's Welfare Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2014

Jen-Der Lue
Jen-Der Lue*
Affiliation:
National Chung-Chen University, Taiwan E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the discussion about the governance capacity of small states in the world market raised by Katzenstein, the case of East Asian newly industrialised countries is an interesting one. This article takes the development of social policy in Taiwan as a case study through which to explore the role of social policy in the process of rapid industrialisation in small states. It is argued that in the initial phase of industrialisation the productive component of social policy was highlighted by the developmental state to serve the goal of economic development. Social policy functioned at this stage as an effective instrument to dampen the cost of labour and thus contributed to the low-cost strategy of developmental state. Since the 1980s, however, social policy has been profoundly transformed as a consequence of economic globalisation on the one hand and domestic democratisation on the other. It is argued that social policy making since the 1990s in Taiwan has shifted in emphasis from the productive to the consumptive component. Finally, it is suggested that three factors will be decisive in determining Taiwan's social policy in the future: limited governmental revenues, fiscal strain due the public debt problem and the steering capacity of minority governments.

Keywords

Productive Social Policyglobalisationdemocratisationwelfare capitalismTaiwan
Type
Themed Section on Managing Social Change and Social Policy in Greater China: Welfare Regimes in Transition?
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 275 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, A. H. (1985) ‘The state and Taiwan's economic development’, in Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–106.Google Scholar
Bagawati, J. (1999) ‘Globalization: who gains, who loses?’, in Siebert, H. (ed.), Globalization and Labor, Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 225–38.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1978) ‘The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis’, American Political Science Review, 72, 4, 1243–61.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-F. and Lue, J.-D. (2012) ‘Financial crisis and social protection reform in Taiwan: path dependence or path breaking?’, Social Policy and Social Work, 16, 2, 191–246 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheng, T. J. (1990) ‘Political regimes and developmental strategies: South Korea and Taiwan’, in Gereffi, G. and Wyman, D. L. (eds.), Manufacturing Miracles: Path of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 139–78.Google Scholar
Chu, Y. H. (1999) ‘Surviving the East Asian financial strom: the political foundation of Taiwan's economic resilience’, in Pempel, T. J. (ed.), The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 184–202.Google Scholar
Council of Labor Affairs (2012) Labor Statistics Bulletin, Taipei: Department of Labor Management Relations, Council for Labor Affairs.Google Scholar
Deyo, F. (1992) ‘The political economy of social policy formation: East Asia's newly industralizing countries’, in Applebaum, R. and Henderson, J. (eds.), States and Development in the Asia Pacific Rim, London: Sage: pp. 289–306.Google Scholar
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) (2000) Taiwan Statistical Yearbook 2000, Taipei: DGBAS.Google Scholar
DGBAS (2012) Report on the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure, Taipei: Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
Fei, J. C. H., Ranis, G. and Kuo, S. W. Y. (1979) Growth with Equality: The Taiwan Case, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fields, K. J. (2012) ‘Not of a piece: developmental states, industrial policy, and evolving patterns of capitalism in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan’, in Walter, A. and Zhang, X. (eds.), East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, Continuity, and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–67.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2000) Globalization and Regional Welfare Regimes: The East-Asian Case – Global Social Policy Programme, Bath: University of Bath, Institute for International Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. (1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R. R. (2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and East Europe, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, I. (2000) ‘Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia’, Political Studies, 48, 4, 706–23.Google Scholar
Huang, C. H. (2010) ‘From opening the port to joining the WTO: the historical and structural transformation of contemporary capitalism in Taiwan’, in Hwang, J. L., Wang, H. L. and Huang, C. H. (eds.), Empire Edge: The Investigation of Taiwan's Modernity, Taipei: Socio Publishing, pp. 167–70 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Inoue, Y. (2001) ‘East Asian capitalism and regulation approach’, Conference of East Asian Development Models and Their Crisis: The Regulationist Approach, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, pp. 19–20, April.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, H. (2003) ‘Advocacy coalitions and the politics of welfare in Korea after the economic crisis’, Policy and Politics, 31, 1, 69–83.Google Scholar
Lai, C. C. (1999) ‘Taiwan's fiscal problem, characteristics and the content of reform in the past ten years’, in Yu, C. S. and Sun, K. L. (eds.), Fiscal Balance and Fiscal Reform: Evaluation of Taiwan's Experience, Taipei: Chun-Ha Institute for Economic Research, 109–65.Google Scholar
Lue, J. D. (1999) ‘Die Veraenderung der Staatsaufgaben: Die Organisationsreform der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung in Taiwan als Beispiel (1988–1997)’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance (2001) The Export-Import Trade Statistical Monthly, Taipei: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Ministry of the Interior (2012) Monthly Statistics of Interior Affairs, Taipei: Ministry of the Interior, http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/m3–01.xls.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone too Far?, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Selden, M. (1997) ‘China, Japan, and the regional political economy of East Asia, 1945–1995’, in Katzenstein, P. J. and Shiraishi, T. (eds.), Network Power: Japan and Asia, Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press, pp. 306–40.Google Scholar
Sun, C.-C. (2000) The Study on the Implementation and Construction of Social Assistance System in Taiwan, Taipei: Shihying (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tsai, M.-C. (2001) ‘Dependency, the state and class in the neoliberal transition of Taiwan’, Third World Quarterly, 22, 3, 359–79.Google Scholar
Tsai, M.-C. (2010) ‘Taiwan and the world: the history of linkage and connections’, in Hwang, J. L., Wang, H. L. and Huang, C. H. (eds.), Empire Edge: The Investigation of Taiwan's Modernity, Taipei: Socio Publishing, pp. 63–100 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, J.-H. (2001) ‘Restructuring exportism: Taiwan's mode of growth in transition’, Conference of East Asian Development Models and Their Crisis: The Regulationist Approach, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, pp. 19–20 April.Google Scholar
Wong, J. (2004) Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar