Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:03:41.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining the Issue: The Intersection of Domestic Abuse and Disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

Jennifer Nixon
Jennifer Nixon*
Affiliation:
Ruskin College, Oxford and an Associate Fellow at the Rothermere American Institute at the University of Oxford E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study on the politicisation of domestic violence as it relates to the experiences of disabled survivors and argues that definitions of domestic violence are currently being debated within the disability and domestic violence spheres. Data are drawn from interviews with participants who have been active in politicising this issue and are affiliated to either the disabled people's movement or the movement against domestic violence in England and North Carolina. Although this issue is becoming increasingly politicised, this paper argues the process is currently marked by widespread discrepancies in defining domestic violence experienced by disabled people.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 475 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corker, M. (1998), ‘Disability discourse in a postmodern world’, in Shakespeare, T. (ed.), The Disability Reader, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Crow, L. (1996), ‘Including all of our lives: reviewing the social model of disability’, in Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (eds.), Exploring the Divide, Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
Depoy, E., Gilson, S. and Cramer, E. (2003), ‘Understanding the experiences of and advocating for the service and resource needs of abused, disabled women’, in Hans, A. and Pat, A. (eds.), Women, Disability and Identity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Drake, R. (1999), Understanding Disability Policies, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, B. (2000), Feminist Perspectives on Disability, Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, V. (1980), Attitudes and Disabled People, New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1989), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Greater London Action on Disability (2003), ‘Response to safety and justice: the government's proposals on domestic violence’, GLAD, London (unpublished).Google Scholar
Home Office (2005), Domestic Violence: A National Report, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2007), Crime in England and Wales 2006/07, Home Office Statistical Bulletin, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Kosberg, J. and Mangum, W. (2002), ‘The invisibility of older men in gerontology’, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 22, 4, 27–42.Google Scholar
Krug, E., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A. and Lozano, R. (2002), World Report on Violence and Health, Geneva: World Health Organization.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPhail, B., Busch, N., Kulkarni, S. and Rice, G. (2007), ‘An integrative feminist model: the evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence’, Violence Against Women, 13, 8, 817–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J. (1991), Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability, London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Mullender, A. (1996), Rethinking Domestic Violence: The Social Work and Probation Response, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, N. (2003), ‘Historical overview of disability policy’, Paper presented at The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, 3 May 2003, http://www.wheelchairnet.org/WCN_Living/Docs/Historicaloverview.html, 14 March 2005.Google Scholar
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (2005), ‘What is battering’, http://www.ncadv.org/learn/TheProblem_100.html, 21 November 2008.Google Scholar
Penhale, B. (2003), ‘Older women, domestic violence and elder abuse: a review of commonalities, difference and shared approaches’, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 15, 3/4, 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestly, M. (1999), Disability Politics and Community Care, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Rioux, M., Crawford, C., Ticoll, M. and Bach, M. (1997), ‘Uncovering the shape of violence: a research methodology rooted in the experience of people with disabilities’, in Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (eds.), Doing Disability Research, Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, T. (2006), Disability Rights and Wrongs, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, T. (2004), ‘Researching people in power practice, analysis and action’, in Skinner, T., Hester, M. and Malos, E. (eds.), Researching Gender Violence, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
Stone, E. and Priestley, M. (1996), ‘Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers’, British Journal of Sociology, 47, 4, 699–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjaden, P. and Thoennes, N. (2000), Extent, Nature and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: Research report, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Justice (2005), Family Violence Statistics, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Walby, S. and Myhill, A. (2004), Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 276, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Whittaker, T. (2007), ‘Violence, gender and elder abuse: towards a feminist analysis and practice’, in O'Toole, L., Schiffman, J., Kiter Edwards, M. and Edwards, M. (eds.), Gender Violence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, London: New York University Press.Google Scholar