Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:37:41.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Domostroi as Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Simon Karlinsky*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See (Leningrad), II, No. 1 (1929), 187-202.

2 , IV (Moscow, 1961), 391-93.

3 D. S. Mirsky, A History of Russian Literature (New York, 1960), p. 21.

4 (Moscow, 1952), p. 273.

5 A. C. (Moscow, 1945), p. 300.

6 , No. 3 (July-Sept.), 1872.

7 M. A. (Leningrad, 1957).

8 See, for example, I, II (Paris, 1932), 20-24 and 95-109.

9 OPдOB, p. 300.

10 Page numbers cited in the text refer to JoMOCTpofi, ed. B. A. flKOMeB (St. Petersburg, 1867). Although justly denounced by Orlov as a compilation of several versions, this first Iakovlev edition has the advantage of offering the largest possible number of examples for the purposes of this study. Most of the examples cited have been checked against the Orlov edition of the Konshin copy (see the following note) and the second revised and abridged edition by Iakovlev (Odessa, 1887). The few discrepancies noted in no way contradict the arguments of this paper.

11 (Moscow, 1908).

12 , p. 189.

13 , V (Moscow, 1949), 252.

14 , IV (Moscow, 1961), 244-46.