Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:56:26.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Oriental Despotism” and Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Nicholas V. Riasanovsky*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Additionally, according to Wittfogel, Russia was affected, presumably from the tenth century, by another Oriental despotism, the Byzantine. I am not, however, going to discuss the extremely important subject of Russo-Byzantine relations for at least three reasons: in general, it is not considered a part of the topic of Russia and Asia; while Wittfogel does include it in his scheme, he devotes very little attention to it; and, finally, I lack space.

2 I realize, of course, that what Professor Wittfogel has to contribute to Russian history is not in the nature of a detailed investigation of facts. And, to repeat, I welcome his contribution. Indeed, it is impossible for a Toynbee or a Wittfogel to specialize in the history of every country which he discusses or classifies. Regretfully, it is usually equally impossible for specialists to agree with these master builders.

3 See especially Alexander, Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 1962).Google Scholar