Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:55:08.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Forgotten Pogroms, 1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

Michael L. Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The outbreaks of anti-Jewish violence in the former Habsburg lands in the fall of 1918 are often overlooked, in part because of the subsequent violence in Hungary (1919–1921), in part because of the myth of Czechoslovak exceptionalism that emerged during the interwar period. It is tempting to view the post-war power vacuum as the main context – and catalyst – for this wave of violence that erupted after the collapse of the monarchy. A closer look at the anti-Jewish violence, however, suggests that it was part of the state-building process, or at least part of an effort to demarcate the exclusive terms of membership in the newly-established states. In explaining or justifying the anti-Jewish violence, perpetrators (and their supporters) often invoked the canard of Jewish “provocation” or the myth of Jewish “power” as part of a larger discourse of exclusion that placed Jews outside the Hungarian, Polish, or Czechoslovak body politic.

Type
Critical Discussion Forum: 1918/2018
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , Fall 2019 , pp. 648 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “A hét eseményei,” Egyenlőség, November 9, 1918, 1.

2 “Pogrom-hirek,” Egyenlőség, December 14, 1918, 1. For reports on the anti-Jewish violence in Hungary in November and December 1918, see “A forradalom szenvedései,” Egyenlőség, November 23, 1918, 2–3; “A forradalom szenvedései,” Egyenlőség, November 30, 1918, 2–3; and “A forradalom szenvedései,” Egyenlőség, December 14, 1918, 5–7. See also Gábor Kádár and Zoltán Vági, “Forradalmak kora: antiszemita pogromok és atrocitások 1918–1919-ben,” Társadalmi Konfliktusok Kutatóközpont, at http://konfliktuskutato.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145:forradalmak-kora-antiszemita-pogromok-es-atrocitasok-1918-19-ben-&catid=15:tanulmanyok#sdfootnote19sym (accessed August 7, 2019).

3 Pelle, János, A gyűlölet vetése : A zsidótörvények és magyar közvélemény 1938–1944 (Budapest, 2001), 20Google Scholar. Cited by Kádár and Vági, “Forradalmak kora.”

4 Deák, István, “Budapest and the Hungarian Revolutions of 1918–1919,” The Slavonic and East European Review 46, no. 106 (January 1968), 129Google Scholar.

5 Hanebrink, Paul A., In Defense of Christian Hungary: Religion, Nationalism, and Antisemitism, 1890–1944 (Ithaca, 2006), 88n24Google Scholar; Eliza Johnson, “‘Cleansing the Red Nest’: Counterrevolution and White Terror in Munich and Budapest, 1919” (PhD diss., Columbia University, 2004), 83–87.

6 Budnitskii, Oleg, Russian Jews between the Reds and the Whites, 1917–1920 (Philadelphia, 2012), 216–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 “The Forgotten Genocide: The Pogroms in Ukraine, 1918–1919,” Discussion at the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, New York, May 16, 2016.

8 Lajos Magyar, “Nem lesz pogrom!,” Egyenlőség, December 7, 1918, 3.

9 Hagen, William W., Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 1914–1920 (Cambridge, Eng., 2018), 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Hagen, William W., “The Moral Economy of Ethnic Violence: The Pogrom of Lwów, November 1918,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 31, no. 2 (April–June 2005), 208Google Scholar.

11 William W. Hagen, “The Moral Economy,” 215.

12 Quoted in Kateřina Čapková, Czechs, Germans, Jews?: National Identity and the Jews of Bohemia (New York, 2012), 111.

13 Fišer, Zdeněk, Poslední pogrom: události v Holešově ve dnech 3. a 4. prosince 1918 a jejich historické pozadí (Kroměříž, 1996)Google Scholar.

14 Kateřina Čapková, Czechs, Germans, Jews, 107–20; Frankl, Michal and Szabó, Miroslav, Budování státu bez antisemitismu?: násilí, diskurz loajality a vznik Československa (Prague, 2016), 47–71Google Scholar.

15 Lichtenstein, Tatjana, “Jewish Power and Powerlessness: Prague Zionists and the Paris Peace Conference,” East European Jewish Affairs 44, no. 1 (2014): 2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Quoted in Čapková, Czechs, Germans, Jews, 112.

17 Engel, David, “What’s in a Pogrom? European Jews in the Age of Violence,” in Dekel-Chen, Jonathan et al. , eds., Anti-Jewish Violence: Rethinking the Pogrom in East European History (Bloomington, 2011): 19–37Google Scholar, especially 27.

18 “A hét eseményei,” Egyenlőség, November 9, 1918, 1.

19 William W. Hagen, Anti-Jewish Violence, 147; Michael Frankl and Miroslav Szabó, Budování státu, 70–71.

20 Kučera, Rudolf, “Exploiting Victory, Sinking into Defeat: Uniformed Violence in the Creation of the New Order in Czechoslovakia and Austria,” The Journal of Modern History 88, no. 4 (December 2016): 827–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Konrád, Ota, “Two Post-War Paths: Popular Violence in the Bohemian Lands and in Austria in the Aftermath of World War I,” Nationalities Papers 46, no. 5 (2018): 759–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Schivelbusch, Wolfgang, The Culture of Defeat: On National Trauma, Mourning and Recovery, trans. Chase, Jefferson (New York, 2003)Google Scholar. For a comprehensive, comparative study of paramilitary violence in Europe, see Gerwarth, Robert and Horne, John, eds., War in Peace: Paramilitary Violence in Europe after the Great War (Oxford, 2012.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Ota Konrád, “Two Post-War Paths,” 768.

23 Engel, David, “Lwów, 1918: The Transmutation of a Symbol and Its Legacy in the Holocaust,” in Zimmerman, Joshua D., ed., Contested Memories: Poles and Jews during the Holocaust and Its Aftermath (New Brunswick, 2003), 33–34Google Scholar.

24 Čapková, Czechs, Germans, Jews, 109.

25 Ibid.

26 Quoted in Michal Frankl and Miroslav Szabó, Budování státu, 71.

27 Frankel, Jonathan, “The Paradoxical Politics of Marginality: Thoughts on the Jewish Situation during the Years 1914–1921,” Studies in Contemporary Jewry 4 (1988): 3–21Google Scholar. See also Tatjana Lichtenstein, “Jewish Power and Powerlessness,” 2–20.

28 David Engel, “Lwów, 1918,” 32.

29 “A magyar zidókhoz,” Egyenlőség, November 2, 1918, 1.

30 Hadler, Frank, “‘Erträglicher Antisemitismus’?—Jüdische Fragen und tschechoslowakische Antworten 1918/19,” Jahrbuch des Simon-Dubnow-Instituts 1 (2002): 169–200Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., 178.

32 William W. Hagen, Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 126.