Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:22:56.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micropylar seed coat restraint and embryonic response to heat shock and smoke control seed dormancy in Grevillea juniperina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Candida L. Briggs ,
E. Charles Morris  and
Glenn Stone
Candida L. Briggs
Affiliation:
School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
E. Charles Morris*
Affiliation:
School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Glenn Stone
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of some eastern Australian Grevillea species show the characteristics of non-deep physiological dormancy, which is broken by exposure to heat shock and/or smoke. The current study tested whether the restrictive effect of the seed coat on germination was localized to specific regions, whether the fire cues affected the growth potential of the embryo, the mechanical strength of the seed coat itself, and the anatomy of fracturing of the seed coat. Removal of the micropylar seed coat allowed germination, while retaining it in place restricted germination. The growth potential of the embryo was increased by exposure to heat shock or to smoke, and increased the most if exposed to both cues. Estimation of the minimum force required by embryos to germinate from intact seeds suggested that this force was reduced for seeds treated with fire cues. The fire cues did not affect the resistance of the seed coat to compressive force when tested after 24 h of imbibition. Fracturing of the seed coat occurred between cell walls, except for the palisade layer, where fracturing occurred across palisade and sclerenchyma cells. While the micropylar end of the seed coat imposes dormancy, most likely by mechanical constraint, heat shock and smoke overcome dormancy by increasing the embryo's growth potential and possibly weakening the seed coat, either directly or via the embryo.

Keywords

embryonic growth potentialmechanical constraintnon-deep physiological dormancyselective seed coat removalwater potential
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 111 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaami, D.I. and Raji, A.O. (2006) Some physical and engineering properties of Prosopis africana seeds. Biosystems Engineering 95, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arana, M.V., De Miguel, L.C. and Sánchez, R.A. (2006) A phytochrome-dependent embryonic factor modulates gibberellin responses in the embryo and micropylar endosperm of Datura ferox seeds. Planta 223, 847–857.Google Scholar
Auld, T.D. and Tozer, M. (1995) Patterns in emergence of Acacia and Grevillea seedlings after fire. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 115, 5–15.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2014) Seeds: Ecology biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination (2nd edition). St Louis, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1971) Effect of chilling and gibberellic acid on growth potential of excised embryos of Ruellia humilis . Planta 100, 365–369.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2004) A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research 14, 1–16.Google Scholar
Briggs, C.L. and Morris, E.C. (2008) Seed-coat dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia: little change in permeability to an apoplastic tracer after treatment with smoke and heat. Annals of Botany 101, 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C.L., Morris, E.C. and Ashford, A.E. (2005) Investigations into seed dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia, G. buxifolia and G. sericea: anatomy and histochemistry of the seed coat. Annals of Botany 96, 965–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, G.E., Virgona, J.M. and Heady, R.D. (2009) Effect of boiling water, seed coat structure and provenance on the germination of Acacia melanoxylon seeds. Australian Journal of Botany 57, 139–147.Google Scholar
Carpita, N.C., Nabors, M.W., Ross, C.W. and Petretic, N.L. (1979) The growth physics and water relations of red-light induced germination in lettuce seeds. III. Changes in the osmotic and pressure potential in red- and far-red-treated embryonic axes. Planta 144, 217–224.Google Scholar
Chen, S.S.C. (1968) Germination of light-inhibited seed of Nemophila insignis . American Journal of Botany 55, 1177–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delanoy, M., Van Damme, P., Sceldeman, X. and Beltran, J. (2006) Germination of Passiflora mollissima (Kunth) L.H. Bailey, Passiflora tricuspis Mast. and Passiflora nov. sp. seeds. Scientia Horticulturae 110, 198–203.Google Scholar
De Miguel, L. and Sanchez, R.A. (1992) Phytochrome-induced germination, endosperm softening and embryo growth potential in Datura ferox seeds: sensitivity to low water potential and time to escape to FR reversal. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 969–994.Google Scholar
Egerton-Warburton, L. (1998) A smoke-induced alteration of the sub-testa cuticle in seeds of the post-fire recruiter, Emmenanthe penduliflora Benth. (Hydrophyllaceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1317–1327.Google Scholar
Esashi, Y. and Leopold, A.C. (1968) Physical forces in dormancy and germination of Xanthium seeds. Plant Physiology 43, 871–876.Google Scholar
Feurtado, J.A., Ren, C., Ambrose, S.J., Cutler, A.J., Ross, A.R.S., Abrams, S.R. and Kermode, A.R. (2008) The coat-enhanced dormancy mechanism of western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl. ex D. Don) seeds is mediated by abscisic acid homeostasis and mechanical restraint. Seed Science and Technology 38, 265–279.Google Scholar
Kenny, B. (2000). Influence of multiple fire-related germination cues on three Sydney Grevillea (Proteaceae) species. Austral Ecology 25, 664–669.Google Scholar
Kucera, B., Cohn, M.A. and Leubner-Metzger, G. (2005) Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Science Research 15, 281–307.Google Scholar
Light, M.E., Daws, M.I. and Van Staden, J. (2009) Smoke-derived butenolide: towards understanding its biological effects. South African Journal of Botany 75, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Guo, J., Han, X. and Yan, G. (2015) Grevillea (Proteaceae) seed coats contain inhibitors for seed germination. Australian Journal of Botany 63, 566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehana, H.T. and Martin, G.C. (1985) Effect of seed coat on peach seed germination. Scientia Horticulturae 25, 247–254.Google Scholar
Michel, B.E. (1983) Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of a polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiology 72, 66–70.Google Scholar
Morris, E.C. (2000) Germination response of seven east Australian Grevillea species (Proteaceae) to smoke, heat exposure and scarification. Australian Journal of Botany 48, 179–189.Google Scholar
Morris, E.C., Tieu, A. and Dixon, K. (2000) Seed coat dormancy in two species of Grevillea (Proteaceae). Annals of Botany 86, 771–775.Google Scholar
Morrison, D.A. and Morris, E.C. (2000) Pseudoreplication and the design of seed germination experiments. Austral Ecology 25, 292–296.Google Scholar
Nabors, M.W. and Lang, A. (1971) The growth physics and water relations of red-light-induced germination in lettuce seeds. I. Embryos germinating in osmoticum. Planta 101, 1–25.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.C., Flematti, E.L., Dixon, K.W. and Smith, S.M. (2012) Regulation of seed germination and seedling growth by chemical signals from burning vegetation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niklas, K.J., Spatz, H.-C. and Vincent, J. (2006) Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus. American Journal of Botany 93, 1369–1378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogunjimi, L.A.O., Aviara, N.A. and Aregbesola, O.A. (2002) Some engineering properties of locust bean seed. Journal of Food Engineering 55, 95–99.Google Scholar
Singh, K.K. and Goswami, T.K. (1998) Mechanical properties of cumin seed (Cuminum cyminum Linn.) under compressive loading. Journal of Food Engineering 36, 311–321.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.B., Morris, E.C. and Auld, T.D. (2007) Response surface for the combined effects of heat shock and smoke on germination of 16 species forming soil seed banks in south-east Australia. Austral Ecology 32, 605–616.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.F.V. (1990) Fracture properties of plants. Advances in Botanical Research 17, 235–287.Google Scholar
Weston, L.A., Geneve, R.L. and Staub, J.E. (1992) Seed dormancy in Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii (Royle) Alef. Scientia Horticulturae 50, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Briggs supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Briggs supplementary material(File)
File 21.3 KB