Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:38:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of short-term germination delay on fitness of the annual weed Agrostemma githago (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2016

A. Theresa Rühl ,
Tobias W. Donath ,
Annette Otte  and
R. Lutz Eckstein
A. Theresa Rühl*
Affiliation:
Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Tobias W. Donath
Affiliation:
Department of Landscape Ecology, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Annette Otte
Affiliation:
Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
R. Lutz Eckstein
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Life Sciences – Biology, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden
*
*Correspondence Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Time of seedling emergence is an important step in the life cycle of annual plants because it may determine subsequent performance and success. Timing of emergence is especially critical to plant performance in habitats like arable fields which are subject to frequent disturbances. Within-season variation in timing of germination in the range of only a few days is typical for many arable weeds. However, since it is unclear whether such small deviations in germination date translate into fitness differences in the course of the life cycle, the aim of this paper was to quantify the effects of short germination delays on plant performance. We conducted two generalized randomized block experiments in an unheated greenhouse to study the impact of delayed germination (1, 2, 3 and 7 d) with and without competition, respectively, on the fitness of the arable weed species Agrostemma githago (L.). We expected that delayed germination significantly reduces fitness in terms of several life-history traits, and that the decrease of fitness is higher in the presence of competition. Under realistic conditions with competition through barley, Agrostemma plants with delayed germination of 7 d produced 54% fewer shoots, 57% less biomass, 52% fewer flowers, 36% lighter seeds and were 23% shorter as compared to control plants without delayed germination. Without additional stress through competition with barley this pattern was less pronounced. Thus, in the situation of interspecific competition, early emerging seedlings have biologically significant fitness advantages over later emerging seedlings of the same species.

Keywords

arable weedsasynchronous germinationinterspecific competitionlife-history traits
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 93 - 100
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, S., Kailichova, Y., Knauer, J., Ruthsatz, A.D. and Baumgartl, T. (2014) Effects of soil water potential on germination of co-dominant Brigalow species: implications for rehabilitation of water-limited ecosystems in the Brigalow Belt bioregion. Ecological Engineering 70, 35–42.Google Scholar
Barrett, S.H. (1983) Crop mimicry in weeds. Economic Botany 37, 255–282.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (2001) Seeds – ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, J.N. and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963) The role of time of emergence in determining the growth of individual plants in swards of subterranean clover. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 628–638.Google Scholar
Childs, D.Z., Metcalf, C.J.E. and Rees, M. (2010) Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 277, 3055–3064.Google Scholar
Cook, R.E. (1980) Germination and size-dependent mortality in Viola blanda . Oecologia 47, 115–117.Google Scholar
Cristaudo, A., Gresta, F., Catara, S. and Mingos, A. (2014) Assessment of daily heat pulse regimes on the germination of six Amaranthus species. Weed Research 54, 366–376.Google Scholar
De Luis, M., Verdú, M. and Raventós, J. (2008) Early to rise makes a plant healthy, wealthy, and wise. Ecology 89, 3061–3071.Google Scholar
Donohue, K., Rubio de Casas, R., Burghardt, L., Kovach, K. and Willis, C.G. (2010) Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 41, 293–319.Google Scholar
Dyer, A.R., Fenech, A. and Rice, K.J. (2000) Accelerated seedling emergence in interspecific competitive neighbourhoods. Ecology Letters 3, 523–529.Google Scholar
Eckstein, R.L. and Donath, T.W. (2005) Interactions between litter and water availability affect seedling emergence in four familial pairs of floodplain species. Journal of Ecology 93, 807–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberg, H. and Leuschner, C. (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen (6th edition). Stuttgart, Germany, Ulmer.Google Scholar
Fay, P.A. and Schultz, M.J. (2009) Germination, survival, and growth of grass and forb seedlings: effects of soil moisture variability. Acta Oecologica 35, 679–684.Google Scholar
Firbank, L.G. and Watkinson, A.R. (1986) Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effects upon crop yield. Journal of Applied Ecology 23, 147–159.Google Scholar
Funk, F.A., Loydi, A. and Peter, G. (2014) Effects of biological soil crusts and drought on emergence and survival of a Patagonian perennial grass in the Monte of Argentina. Journal of Arid Land 6, 735–741.Google Scholar
González-Astorga, J. and Núñez-Farfán, J. (2000) Variable demography in relation to germination time in the annual plant Tagetes micrantha Cav. (Asteraceae). Plant Ecology 151, 253–259.Google Scholar
Gremer, J.R. and Venable, D.L. (2014) Bet hedging in desert winter annual plants: optimal germination strategies in a variable environment. Ecology Letters 17, 380–387.Google Scholar
Harper, J.L. (1977) Population biology of plants. London, UK, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M. and Daws, M.I. (2007) Impact of red:far red ratios on germination of temperate forest herbs in relation to shade tolerance, seed mass and persistence in the soil. Functional Ecology 21, 1055–1062.Google Scholar
Jones, R.H. and Sharitz, R.R. (1989) Potential advantages and disadvantages of germinating early for trees in floodplain forests. Oecologia 81, 443–449.Google Scholar
Kalisz, S. (1986) Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariceae). Evolution 40, 479–491.Google Scholar
Kelly, M.G. and Levin, D.A. (1997) Fitness consequences and heritability aspects of emergence date in Phlox drummondii . Journal of Ecology 85, 755–766.Google Scholar
Klotz, S., Kühn, I. and Durka, W. (2002) BIOLFLOR – Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Series of publications for botanical knowledge (Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde) 38. Bonn – Bad Godesberg, Germany, Office for Nature Conservation.Google Scholar
Kornas, J. (1988) Speirochore Ackerwildkräuter: Von ökologischer Spezialisierung zum Aussterben. Flora 180, 83–91.Google Scholar
Leishman, M.R., Wright, I.J., Moles, A.T. and Westoby, M. (2000) The evolutionary ecology of seed size. pp. 31–57 in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities (2nd edition). Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Lopes Souza, M. and Fagundes, M. (2014) Seed size as key factor in germination and seedling development of Copaifera langsdorffii (Fabaceae). American Journal of Plant Sciences 5, 2566–2573.Google Scholar
Loydi, A., Donath, T.W., Otte, A. and Eckstein, R.L. (2015) Negative and positive interactions among plants: effect of competitors and litter on seedling emergence and growth of forest and grassland species. Plant Biology 17, 667–675.Google Scholar
Ludewig, K., Zelle, B., Eckstein, R.L., Mosner, E., Otte, A. and Donath, T.W. (2014) Differential effects of reduced water potentials on the germination of grassland species indicating wet and dry habitats. Seed Science Research 24, 49–61.Google Scholar
Ludwig, G. and Schnittler, M. (1996) Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands. Series of publications for botanical knowledge (Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde) 28. Bonn – Bad Godesberg, Germany, Office for Nature Conservation.Google Scholar
Milberg, P., Andersson, L. and Thompson, K. (2000) Large-seeded species are less dependent on light for germination than small-seeded ones. Seed Science Research 10, 99–104.Google Scholar
Otte, A. (1995) The temperature requirements of crop field herbs at the time of germination – another cause for the changes in the plant associations of crop fields (with examples from the districts of Freising and Munich, Germany). pp. 280–288 in Song, Y.; Dierschke, H.; Wang, X. (Eds) Proceedings of the 35th Symposium of the International Association for Vegetation Science (Applied Vegetation Ecology). Shanghai, China, East China Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Otte, A., Bissels, S. and Waldhardt, R. (2006) Seed, germination and site characteristics: which parameters of arable weeds do explain the change of frequency in Germany? Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 20, 507–516.Google Scholar
Quinn, G.P. and Keough, M.J. (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quintana, J.R., Cruz, A., Fernández-González, F. and Moreno, J.M. (2004) Time of germination and establishment success after fire of three obligate seeders in a Mediterranean shrubland of central Spain. Journal of Biogeography 31, 241–249.Google Scholar
Rees, M. (1994) Delayed germination of seeds: a look at the effects of adult longevity, the timing of reproduction, and population age/stage structure. American Naturalist 144, 43–64.Google Scholar
Rees, M. (1996) Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 351, 1299–1308.Google Scholar
Rees, M. and Long, M.J. (1992) Germination biology and the ecology of annual plants. American Naturalist 139, 484–508.Google Scholar
Rice, K.J. (1990) Reproductive hierarchies in Erodium: effects of variation in plant density and rainfall distribution. Ecology 71, 1316–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rühl, A.T., Eckstein, R.L., Otte, A. and Donath, T. (2016) Distinct germination response of endangered and common arable weeds to reduced water potential. Plant Biology 18, 83–90.Google Scholar
Schmiede, R., Ruprecht, E., Eckstein, R.L., Otte, A. and Donath, T.W. (2013) Establishment of rare flood meadow species by plant material transfer: experimental tests of threshold amounts and the effect of sowing position. Biological Conservation 159, 222–229.Google Scholar
Schütz, W. (2000) The importance of seed regeneration strategies for the persistence of species in the changing landscape of Central Europe. Journal of Nature Conservation 9, 73–83.Google Scholar
Simons, A.M. (2011) Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 278, 1601–1609.Google Scholar
Sletvold, N. (2002) Effects of plant size on reproductive output and offspring performance in the facultative biennial Digitalis purpurea . Journal of Ecology 90, 958–966.Google Scholar
Storkey, J., Moss, S.R. and Cussans, J.W. (2010) Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Science 58, 39–46.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.A. (1973) The effects of geographical dispersal by man on the evolution of physiological races of Corncockle (Agrostemma gitagho L.). Annals of Botany 37, 413–421.Google Scholar
Venable, D.L. and Brown, J.S. (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. American Naturalist 131, 360–384.Google Scholar
Venable, D.L., Búrquez, A., Corral, G., Morales, E. and Espinosa, F. (1987) The ecology of seed heteromorphism in Heterosperma pinnatum in Central Mexico. Ecology 68, 65–76.Google Scholar
Verdú, M. and Traveset, A. (2005) Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. Ecology 86, 1385–1394.Google Scholar
Walck, J.L., Hidayati, S.N., Dixon, K.W., Thompson, K. and Poschlod, P. (2011) Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Global Change Biology 17, 2145–2161.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. (1990) Plant population ecology in agriculture. pp. 235–262 in Carroll, C.R.; Vandermeer, J.H.; Rosset, P.M. (Eds) Agroecology. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Zhaohua, L. and He, L. (2014) Effects of saline-alkaline stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 173, 1680–1691.Google Scholar