Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:02:09.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterizing critical phases of germination in winterfat and malting barley with isothermal calorimetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Youming Qiao ,
Ruojing Wang ,
Yuguang Bal  and
Lee D. Hansen
Youming Qiao
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Qinghai University, Xining, 810003, People's Republic of China Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, Canada
Ruojing Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, Canada
Yuguang Bal*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, Canada
Lee D. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84 602, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1 306 966 5015, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The heat production of seeds during germination comes from metabolism as well as hydration. Previous studies either lack continuous measurements, or are based on samples composed of more than one seed, thus failing to characterize differences among the critical phases of germination. This study examines the potential of isothermal calorimetry to characterize water uptake and metabolism in single seeds. Seeds of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and winterfat [Krascheninnikovia lanata (Pursh) A.D.J. Meeuse & Smit], two species with contrasting seed size, structure, composition and selection history, were used to determine patterns of heat production rate by isothermal calorimetry during water uptake and germination. Embryos of malting barley contributed less than 4% of total seed weight, and metabolic heat production during Phase I of germination was negligible compared to that due to hydration. Embryos accounted for 74% of seed mass for winterfat, and the majority of heat produced in Phase I was due to metabolic heat release. The total heat production rate in Phase I decreased rapidly in malting barley due to slowing of hydration reactions, but increased gradually in winterfat due to an increasing metabolic rate. The heat production rate at the end of Phase II was about twice as high in malting barley as in winterfat. This indicates a higher metabolic activity for malting barley than for winterfat seeds during germination, which may have also contributed to the rapid increase in the heat production rate of malting barley seedlings during Phase III, compared to the gradual increase in heat production rate of winterfat. The comparison between excised embryos and intact seeds indicates that the covering tissues delay radicle emergence in malting barley, but not in winterfat, due to differences in seed structure between the two species.

Keywords

calorimetrygermination phasesHordeum vulgareKrascheninnikovia lanatametabolic heat productionwater uptake
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, Y., Booth, D.T. and Romo, J.T. (1999) Imbibition temperature affects winterfat (Eurotia lanata (Pursh) Moq.) seed hydration and cold-hardiness response. Journal of Range Management 52, 271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1978) Physiology and biochemistry of seeds in relation to germination. Volume I. Development, germination and growth. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1994) Seeds: Physiology of development and germination 2nd edition. London, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1995) Water relations in seed germination. pp. 351–396in Kigel, J.;Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (2002) Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Science 50, 248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D.E. (1992) Barley germination: Biochemical changes and hormonal control. pp. 369–412in Shewry, P.R. (Ed.) Barley: Genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Bogracheva, T.Y., Wang, Y.L., Wang, T.L. and Hedley, C.L. (2002) Structural studies of starches with different water contents. Biopolymers 64, 268–281Google Scholar
Buchanan, B.B., Gruissem, W. and Jones, R.L. (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Rockville, Maryland, American Society of Plant Biologists.Google Scholar
Criddle, R.S. and Hansen, L.D. (1999) Calorimetric methods for analysis of plant metabolism. pp. 711–763in Kemp, R.B. (Ed.) From macromolecules to man (Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry, Vol. 4). Amsterdan, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Criddle, R.S., Breidenbach, R.W., Lewis, E.A., Eatough, D.J. and Hansen, L.D. (1988) Effects of temperature and oxygen depletion on metabolic rates of tomato and carrot cell cultures and cuttings measured by calorimetry. Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 695–701Google Scholar
Criddle, R.C., Smith, B.N. and Hansen, L.D. (1997) A respiration based description of plant growth rate responses to temperature. Planta 201, 441–445Google Scholar
Dell'Aquila, A., van Eck, J.W., and van der Heijden, G.W.A.M. (2000) The application of image analysis in monitoring the imbibition process of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) seeds. Seed Science Research 10, 163–169Google Scholar
Edelstein, M., Bradford, K.J. and Burger, D.W. (2001) Metabolic heat and CO2 production rates during germination of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seeds measured by microcalorimetry. Seed Science Research 11, 265–272Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Covell, S., Roberts, E.H. and Summerfield, R.J. (1986) The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in grain legumes. II. Intraspecific variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at constant temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 1503–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Huidobro, J., Monteith, J.L. and Squire, G.R. (1982) Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides, S & H). 1. Constant temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany 33, 288–296Google Scholar
Gruwel, M.L.H., Yin, X.S., Edney, M.J., Schroeder, S.W., MacGregor, A.W. and Abrams, S. (2002) Barley viability during storage: use of magnetic resonance as a potential tool to study viability loss. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 667–676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, L.D. (1996) Instrument selection for calorimetric drug stability studies. Pharmaceutical Technology 20, 64–74Google Scholar
Hu, Y.C., Zhou, P.J., Wang, C.X. and Qu, S.S. (2001) Thermogenetic curves and thermokinetics of seed germination of Robinia pseudoacacia. Journal of Forestry Research 12, 176–178Google Scholar
McCormac, A.C. and Keefe, P.D. (1990) Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) seed vigour: Imbibition effects. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 893–899Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1995) SAS system for Windows V8. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc..Google Scholar
Sigstad, E.E. and Garcia, C.I. (2001) A microcalorimetric analysis of quinoa seeds with different initial water content during germination at 25°C. Thermochimica Acta 366, 149–155Google Scholar
Sigstad, E.E. and Prado, F.E. (1999) A microcalorimetric study of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. seed germination. Thermochimica Acta 326, 159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigstad, E.E. and Schabes, F.I. (2000) Isothermal microcalorimetry allows detection of ‘aquaporines’ in quinoa seeds. Thermochimica Acta 349, 95–101Google Scholar
Simpson, G.M. (1990) Dormancy in grasses. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spoelstra, P., Joosen, R.V.L., Van de Plas, L.H.W., and Hilhorst, H.W.M. (2002) The distribution of ATP within tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) embryos correlates with germination whereas total ATP concentration does not. Seed Science Research 12, 231–238Google Scholar
Thygerson, T., Harris, J.M., Smith, B.N., Hansen, L.D., Pendelton, R.L. and Booth, D.T. (2002) Metabolic response to temperature for six populations of winterfat (Eurotia lanata). Thermochimica Acta 394, 211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. (2005) Modeling seed germination and seedling emergence in winterfat (Krascheninnikovia lanata (Pursh) A.D.J. Meeuse & Smit): Physiological mechanisms and ecological relevance. PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R., Bai, Y. and Tanino, K. (2004) Effect of seed size and sub-zero imbibition temperature on the thermal time model of winterfat (Eurotia lanata (Pursh) Moq.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 51, 183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, T., Tsukamoto, Y. and Takahashi, K. (1990) Calorimetry as an analytical tool for germination tests of plant seeds. Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 15, 381–386Google ScholarPubMed