Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:03:33.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nature of Christ in Origen's Commentary on John

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

Origen's Commentary on John provides us with a fruitful acquaintance with his christological thinking. The Commentary as a text is not well presented, and for this reason the work is not as well known as it might be, although Origen is the first great commentator of Scripture whose exegetical works have come down to us. It seems important to know what he has to say in those works which he was able to write according to his inclination, and not for the purposes of an argumentum ad hominem. The Commentary on John itself provides the reason why it should be studied as an important revelation of Origen's thought, since he describes the Fourth Gospel as the greatest of the Gospel writings because it contains , and plainly ‘declared ’ in a way the Synoptics did not, although no one can understand the meaning of the Gospel unless, like John, he has been shown ‘by Jesus Himself, Jesus as He is’ (Book I, 6). The writing of this Commentary was not a work taken up lightly or without a great deal of hardship on the part of the author. It is a carefully—indeed painfully—wrought out work, agonised over to the last logical detail according to his exegetical method, and must be considered as one of the most serious attempts at a systematic construction of a christological position in the history of Christian thought.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 176 note 1 A. E. Brookes' Commentary of Origen on S. John, published in 1896 in two volumes seems to be as far as I can discover, the most recent work done on the text of Origen's Commentary. This has been used, and also the Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 9, which translation was based on the text of Lommatzsch, 1831. The chapter numbers given after quotations are taken from this book. There is also a Latin translation by D. A. B. Caillau, printed in Paris, 1842, the value of which was negligible, since great portions of the available books are missing—probably for tendentious reasons.

page 182 note 1 Faye, E. de, Origen and His Work, Introduction, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar

page 182 note 2 Bertrand, F., Mystique de Jésus chez Origène, p. 31.Google Scholar

page 185 note 1 This could be an interesting thought with regard to what the Fathers of the pre-Nicene Church have to say, if they have much to say, about the christological significance of the baptism of Jesus.